>>201103
We think it's really him, but the content of his posts makes it clear the situation isn't exactly a happy one.

The rest of the moderators were a bit confused. I wrote to you on infiend, partly to clarify the situation, but I see you've already partially clarified it here.

Like any thematic community, this one isn't just about its topic; it's something more.

Thank you for your kind wishes to all the anons, and thank you for keeping an eye on the board >>201086

I agree with this >>201104