>>31938 >>32054 >>32055 >>32058 >>32060 >>32071 >>32072 >>32076 >>32077 >>32079 >>32101 >>32138 >>32139 >>32141 >>32150
If you actually opened Tooze's book (available in OP for dl) and check the "Notes" section (starting on page 689) you would actually see what sources the author used, among them you would find great many documents the administration of the German Reich produced itself, and the own written works of such notable National Socialist figures like Halder or Speer.
What sources do you base your claims you try to wave away the conclusions based on aforementioned sources? What were the acceptable sources of your choice?
While you giving your divine statements you get into self-contradictions, not on one occasion - although I will quote only one due to lack of time and space (but it is right in your first post to this topic!): >>31938
>It was poverty and famine.
>Hitler's economic policies were super successful and raised the living standards
So which is it?
You also resort to name calling: >>32054
>Shlomo
Providing red herrings/whataboutisms: >>32055
>Winston the spendaholic
Not to mention cherrypicking and your confirmation bias. With which we arrived to the point what was already touched ny Brazil Bernd: your posting reeks of indignation as if someone would have insulted your precious German Reich ****. Like:
>how dare you calling it weak
>how dare you insinuate they used SHLAAAAAAVEEEEEEEEESHHHHHH
>IT'S ALL LIES LIEEEEEEEEEEEEEES, PROPAGANDA
etc. etc.
These are all weakening your side of the argument, and generally what you wrote cannot be taken seriously.