>>46547
You are extrapolating and responding to a straw man. I did not claim that anyone was or wasn't a "real Chinese" (or a "real Brazilian"). I added relevant context to his statements: he is some kind of racially-motivated anti-"china" separatist (literally, given his interpretation of what the "china" polity is or should be), apparently with a grudge towards han, manchu, and other subgroups, and chinese balkanization (again) appears preferable to him. He is also 21.
Does this persona belong to a "real Chinese"? Maybe, I'm have not claimed one thing or the other. Is his position *operationally* aligned with that of a competing power? Absolutely. I suppose he would agree, given his own take on opinions, stances, and abnormal internet users
Sorry, I don't have more time for elaborating what I actually wanted to. But maybe you would prefer that we drop the seriousdiscussion and just try to bait each other? Sorry, this question is itself a kind of bait, but I'm just joking, just a tiny bit annoyed about the straw man