Well it was expected not to commit all the units at once. But if just one third they can put way more weight there.

>>46653
Well you can say that Ukraine was always meant to be defeated by Russia then.

>>46654
>"let's give out the capital to the Russian army and pray that they won't do no harm"
Never said that.
How do I monger fear? You are the one who envisioned Kiev burnt to the ground.
Do you know what is plainly wrong? The idea that Ukraine can defeat Russia. Ukraine was thrown under the bus by the West (just like we were in 1956) because even they don't see a way. Rather feel safe in the NATO fortress. Even if due to some miracle the Ukrainian troops stops the Russians, the front is still on Ukraine, and they will be forced to give concessions. Putin will pretend those were the goals all along ofc, because this is how it goes: aim high, then claim a lower goal later.
And your thinking is absolutely moves on 1 bit. You can only comprehend 0 or 1. If not supporting Ukraine then it's clearly supporting Russia. This is also horribly wrong.

>>46655
Yes, it is clear when enemy enters then the capital starts to really prosper. It was like that in every war.

>>46656
You are again very much misrepresenting what I wrote. Nice strawman you got there, thank you. I see you aren't capable of more.