>>73
>No suggestive audio-visual content of underage children. Loli ok.

>Lolicon pornography != lolicon.

What a weird take. If you put "loli ok" right after "suggestive audo-visual content" then everyone in their right mind will interpret that as "suggestive audo-visual content of loli is ok". You could argue that only ecchi is allowed though if we focus on "suggestive".

Anyways it seems like there's no good loli place to hang out left. 4chan's /b/ loli threads and allthefallen? Are they still active? I stopped visiting those places years ago and don't feel like going back because they don't allow anonymous posting.