>>61
>A low traffic site such as nano would do fine with only two boards
I am in agreement except I would say 3 would be the amount. Obviously the first board is the random board. Then the tech board finally the meta board where we can discuss options. I believe there has to be a balance between posts which generate discussion and posts which are for fun. For example if I made a thread about how to increase muscle that's a thread that can easily generate some discussion but if someone during that thread suddenly turns it into muh soyboys(no matter how weak they truly are) and it begins to spiral into politics then I believe those posts should be deleted. Fun posts are different from low effort posting for example I would say that food recipes would be considered a fun post while a thread such as
>>48 I would consider a worthless post and should be deleted. Hakase's biggest mistake is being unable to differentiate between what a terrible thread and a fun thread is.

>Hapa spammer/no moderation
Yeah he really did derail the conversations. Probably should have been banned when it began to directly affect the majority of threads or potentially even before then.

>Immature owner
Basically now we are practically stuck in limbo until we get the tech people to make a new nanochan for us to dwell.