>>72154
>"I am not a fascist like these other fascists, I am above them all"
>after which he then lived in obscurity as he allows his work to be mostly forgotten.
Makes sense. If he didn't raise or participate in a group of people, he was never fascist. Because that's actually all fascism ever was. Groupism.
>Hitler still operated on the concept he was dealing with actual European leaders, not their parasitic puppet masters.
Hitler spoke frequently of their jewish puppet masters, especially involving America. He was well aware of international jewry. I respect Scottish Dawn, mainly because I'm a Scot by blood and it disgusts me to learn what's becoming of Scotland. National Action though, anyone named Benjamin (his last name Raymond) I do not trust. I agree with the majority of your message. National Socialism has been aligned with false images of darkness and false accusations of violence and atrocities for too long. The message needs to be positive. Anyone shilling violence and "terrorist actions" needs to be shunned completely. If Hitler is permitted to be viewed in classes or the public eye, it's always untranslated German which the masses don't commonly understand and when he was furious. It's never when he spoke calmly. His messages are not permitted publicly because they're afraid. Millions of Germans did not follow a "dark, brooding, angry leader". They followed a man offering positive change. One who actually made that happen and was appreciated by the German people. This type of event hasn't happened since. I'm reminded of Patrick Little who claimed he was running for the Presidency. Though his entire message was always true and pointed out kikery to the public, he gave up, whined about his wife (kissed Putin's ass) and forfeited his run. We need a leader with an indomitable will offering the positive, not a furious mob of rage fueled calls to violence which are easily villainized by the mainstream media, banned and discarded.