>>91472
> Hispanic
> It's just such an all encompassing word
NO! It's has a very SPECIFIC definition: A person who belongs to Hispanidad.

That's like saying Italians (Latinos) are only those born in Rome or in Latio.

Or Hellinization never happened.

You seem to want to project and impose a NEGRO-LEGENDARY version of the Hispanic Empire, when the Hispanic Empire has been called "the Roman Empire purified by Christianity". How is mistreating people Christian?

The Hispanic people, first in Aragon and Castile (sometimes Leon) then Natives in America, were called "The Firstborns of God" because of the millions that sacrificed themselves to champion Christianity around the world. How can a people that don't do that ever be called something this sublime?

The term "Hispanic" has ALWAYS meant a person who belongs to Hispanic Civilization (Hispanidad). This is seen the 1480s, when Queen Isabel of Castile liberates the people of Las Islas Canarias and makes them Spaniards (a process that took many years). It's NOT automatic, it's civilizational.