>>3694
Oh, ok. I was refering to Alumx by the way.

And yeah, looking at the entirety of the gallery I see it as well >>3695, but looking at pics of singular character (Celestia in this case), not so much.

>I was kind of surprised that this Celestia >>3685 looks really similar to other drawings that makes you wonder if the same artist is behind all of them like here >>1988
I'm not really seeing any connection between these two beside the obvious "they both (are supposed to) depict Celestia".
and now I'm facing a tough choice of either saying "but then I don't have that much of a sharp eye for an art", or proceeding to larp as an art expert and seasoned critic

>which is logical and natural,one artist always follows a pattern to himself
Yeah, an artist building an identity is nothing out of the ordinary.