>>6213
>Making the whole tale one of an unreliable narrator -- there was probably no gun, just as there were no zombies and at this point we need to question if there even was a teenager.
>this is an example of another "theme" in my dreams -- that I can't affect anyone else.
so, could all these elements be considered as illusions for the protagonist within the dream? As if dreams weren´t confusing enough...

>*BUUUUT* it would seem those were from _completely different days_
there would be more room for explaining that context (if this was told as a story and not just an exposition of your meditative exercise)

> I recall the dream where the woodland creatures came to me, because I wielded powerful magic
>Only when the thugs came to me, they mostly didn't feel my magic. I could topple small trees but they never fell on any thugs, and that same power against the oppressors just sorta tickled; I couldn't actually push them back.

>The scene quoted was right as I woke up, so part of it is the 'labels' that aren't visible, such as the extended dream having 'permission' to travel through solid matter, get lost in consciousness.
I see.

>Since "everything is me" The agreement between the scriptwriter and the actors is to relay speech by understanding, rather than actually speaking.
that´s certain because in the end, you are the one who decides in the end (just not consciously despite reflecting these sequences with more precision than other people would manage to describe with words)