>>10974
Yeah, maybe, but it wasn't presented that way. The whole write-up is an emotional manipulation and fallacy driven series of leads.
Its goal is to get you to empathize with an "us" (the Q author), then draw the "them" (The mysterious poisoners). How do you know it is a poison if you don't know the poison? That doesn't even make sense. If you knew it was a poison, you'd know what the poison is. We do have centrifuges...
Plus, it's related to trying to sell you something, not trying to provide anywhere to dig. Though, even if it did, that would just be adding distraction onto the exploitation.

I won't buy it. What info would be in that book which we don't have directly from Q? All the old boards minus media are available on qresear.ch twitter and whatnot are archives for the memes. At best, it could be somebody who compiled this all together... but again, this is open-source information.
Be careful who you follow.