>>15418
I don't get it anon
are you seniority fagging?
or are you famefaging your membership of the elite group of 'we were there when it happened'?
and how do either of those contribute to the voracity of your arguments?

Maybe just let the argument rest on its merits, and forego the appeals to your 'authority' as an oldfag

choice is (you)rs to make
as always

Godspeed, anon
o7