>>15413
Not everyone who disagrees is a shill - not specific to your interlocutor, but in general. They might actually be, but disagreement is not the ultimate criteria. Sometimes we're just cranky bastards, sometimes anons are just contrarian. Some of us "have the combined social graces of a rabid golden retriever" and just cantankerous by nature.

>>15419
>memefags, how about generating some memes that compare the kowtowing of American businesses to Red China with that of similar collaboration with the Nazis?
Working with Naxis was never the problem, working with Communists was, same problem we face today. ChiComm does not refer to the ruling Chinese nazi party, but the ruling Chinese COMMUNIST party/government.
"Nazis" were never the problem.