>>308

Here's a Q thread from a few hours ago that has been archived.

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/223135450

Here's how it seems to me.

You have 4 Chan. And 4 Chan is where Q started, so, in that regard, 4 Chan is good. There are a lot of people typing there. On the other hand, it seems like a lot of people over at 4 Chan don't want Q there. Threads go fast, and get archived, and then become inaccessible.

I would argue that most of the activity should be taking place over at 4 Chan.

But then we have this one, Endchan.net/qrb and Endchan.net/qanonresearch

threads on these boards don't disappear unless there is hacking, and then, typically, the threads and boards come back. It really isn't as good as 4 chan, for the number of people and for the ability to stay up all the time. But it's better than 4 chan for some archival purposes, for shorter time frame archival.

And there's also Zero Net. Which I like because theoretically, it can't be brought off line. It seems hard to use, it might not actually work right, sometimes you post and it seems like you're shadow banned. But if you can get your content up there, it should stay.