Why should you care about average intelligence, rather than cumulative intelligence or the absolute number of people in the current top percentile or what have you?
Are you factoring in the likely increase in local average intelligence caused by development?

>>5972
Explicitly Darwinist or not, the natsoc view on science was insane, and race science was used as motivated reasoning rather than a rational basis for their policies. You won't find anything of value there.
Reverse stupidity is not intelligence. You can't just look who wrong people disagree with and assume they're right.