I think we need to change global demographics and redraw racial borders based on racial economic and scientific competence.

Obviously Nordics and Ashkenazis will get the most territories and the largest population quota which is very fair.

East Kekistan will be naturally enlarged which is exactly what I'm looking for.

Eugenics, simples as that. But our correct cultural landscape is almost impossible to address that problem, so enjoy the decline (until some god-like AI or a rise of GMO superhuman class that take over the world), will be one hell of ride.

>>5971

Exactly. Sanity left the West after WWII since Natsocs were the most explicitly Darwinist regime in the world.

>>5970
>we need
>Obviously Nordics and Ashkenazis will get the most territories and the largest population quota which is very fair.
Who's "we"? This is some pozzed up world government central planning bullshit. Please read and understand Moldbug and Land.

>>5973

>Who's "we"? This is some pozzed up world government central planning bullshit. Please read and understand Moldbug and Land.

Humans. I'm in general strongly against centralized systems. However right now I believe we are in a global emergency. For the future of human civilization we must make sure that all the resources in Africa, Antarctica and South America are properly used or at least known to (the entire) humanity.

Foreign aid, welfare and affirmative action use up resources that should have been used in space exploration and space colonization. This needs to end.

Why should you care about average intelligence, rather than cumulative intelligence or the absolute number of people in the current top percentile or what have you?
Are you factoring in the likely increase in local average intelligence caused by development?

>>5972
Explicitly Darwinist or not, the natsoc view on science was insane, and race science was used as motivated reasoning rather than a rational basis for their policies. You won't find anything of value there.
Reverse stupidity is not intelligence. You can't just look who wrong people disagree with and assume they're right.

>>5981

I'm not saying that natsocs have the right view on science. For example the concept of German vs Jewish dichotomy in science is simply insane.

My actual views are Social Darwinist for the sake of it. To me what is incompetent inherently does not deserve to exist and inherently deserves to be destroyed by the competent. This applies to humans vs humans. This also applies to humans vs AI.

>>5980
>Humans
Referring to your species as "us" is a mistake. In some cases this mistake can be corrected through, once again, Nick Land, though yours may be too severe.

>I'm in general strongly against centralized systems. However right now…
You may have noticed that this is the standard pattern that arguments in favor of centralization follow in the present day. It is by no means limited to arguing about government. First, you proclaim your love for decentralized systems and autonomy, then you say why this time it is absolutely necessary and morally right to establish centralized control on an unprecedented scale and micromanage resources.

>>5999

>Referring to your species as "us" is a mistake. In some cases this mistake can be corrected through, once again, Nick Land, though yours may be too severe.

Yeah. But I can't allow tropicals to ruin human civilizations. The main mission of my life is making sure that if AI or tropicals have to rule over the world we will get AI that treasures at least human-level rationality, philosophy and scientific knowledge. If we all kick the world slightly towards AI and away from tropicalization maybe we will get AI.

>You may have noticed that this is the standard pattern that arguments in favor of centralization follow in the present day. It is by no means limited to arguing about government. First, you proclaim your love for decentralized systems and autonomy, then you say why this time it is absolutely necessary and morally right to establish centralized control on an unprecedented scale and micromanage resources.

Right. I think a decentralized system works better. To get started conquests should no longer be forbidden by some shit known as "international law". That will solve the tropicalization problem within decades.

BTW please PM me on reddit if you want entrance into my private subreddit. You are welcome on r/SevenZillionWitches as well since we respect free speech there.

we must stop nanny state

sage goes in every field