/endpol/ - Political Anarchy

Politics, news, history, and perspectives (without rules).

Boards | Catalog | Bottom

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096


"quidquid Latine dictum sit altum videtur"


(106.70 KB 500x637 1488583540669-pol.jpg)
Welcome. Admin 03/05/2017 (Sun) 14:51:53 Id: e47296 [Preview] No. 1 [Reply]
There are many /pols/, but fundamentally, they are the same.

So no rules from now on.

EDIT: Just in case the site rips; http://32ch.org/32pol/
Edited last time by doonoo on 06/25/2017 (Sun) 02:44:08.
104 posts and 43 images omitted.


Anonymous 07/10/2017 (Mon) 15:20:28 [Preview] No. 400 del
Dubs


Anonymous 07/27/2017 (Thu) 19:23:04 [Preview] No. 423 del
I know we don't do rules here, but I reckon if you deleted the porn images from the two most recent threads made (just the images, not the text itself) you'd save the board from an undeserved death.


Anonymous 08/01/2017 (Tue) 23:09:38 [Preview] No. 424 del
(1.16 MB 2888x2000 a4a.png)
What is your problem with including porn? Pornophobia is a fucking stupid aspect of conservativism. I'm sorry, did the word porn trigger your delicate ears? I'll say pork instead then to avoid upsetting the regressives.

I think it's tastefully drawn. I believe in freespeeeeeeeech, It's what makes America great. Pork is part of free speech. Pork makes America great. Let's make America great again.


Anonymous 08/03/2017 (Thu) 12:53:06 [Preview] No. 425 del
>>424
That's a great way to say a lot of words and refute not one word of my post.



(50.77 KB 1280x853 arablady.jpg)
(51.04 KB 700x400 indianlady.jpg)
(36.04 KB 330x470 asianlady.jpg)
(24.34 KB 400x266 hispaniclady.jpg)
(45.00 KB 564x564 blacklady.jpg)
Who is the superior woman? Anonymous 06/29/2017 (Thu) 06:20:15 [Preview] No. 312 [Reply]
Everyone says white women are the superior women, but have you considered the beauty of other races? Maybe your blinded by your national pride, but not all white women are really that beautiful.
28 posts and 10 images omitted.


Anonymous 07/06/2017 (Thu) 12:21:07 [Preview] No. 387 del
>>385
Because the metaphor reverses all roles and eugenics roughly speaking is political meddling on the free market of genetic evolution, marxism likewise suffers from genetics meddling with the political ideology that would shape marxism. That however is not the point I was able to make in a single sentence, but just a single thing corrected about your denial of it. I know this is really complicated to unpack, but that's what happens when you take a positivist statement and categorically call it "wrong". It would be simpler to work through the limited correctness of positive statements, than the expansive falseness of negative ones.


Anonymous 07/06/2017 (Thu) 19:10:07 [Preview] No. 388 del
ethnicity is a poor choice to use as category since it only adds some minor appearance characteristics.


Anonymous 07/12/2017 (Wed) 00:28:15 [Preview] No. 409 del
>>388
Well im not gonna do a genetic survey on a girl.


Anonymous 07/12/2017 (Wed) 00:50:33 [Preview] No. 410 del
(30.66 KB 293x323 james_watt.gif)
>>388
>only adds some minor appearance characteristics

That's going to be a huge problem if you find and compare two of the same person except from different ethnicities. In a single dimension however, two different people are going to be entirely different, plus that much more different to boot if they're also from different ethnicities.


Anonymous 08/10/2017 (Thu) 15:20:41 [Preview] No. 426 del
(389.50 KB 1080x1080 820057.jpg)
>>380
>Marxism focuses on equality
Wrong
>stateless society
Wrong
>classless society
The only class marxism wants to abolish is the capitalist class

It's pretty funny that some people still think marxists are degenerates or sjw's or something. The reality is that marxists can be anyone, because marxism is not a defining character trait at all, being a marxist simply means that someone likes an economic theory (not to mention that they have no control over the economic situation in the world so it's pointless for them to believe in it anyway, it's just LARPing as a "revolutionary").
Marxists are basically delusional dreamers, but this is all that can be said about them as a group.
>>386
Any ethnic group in west asia or the northwest of south asia is whiter than an average latino.
>>312
I'd mate in my own kind even if I found outsiders more attractive because I have basic self control. In fact this is already the case since I think Germanic and Celtic women are more attractive than my kin but I don't want to be in a relationship with one because there are things more important than looks.
By the way this is why homosexuality can't be a genetic trait, because it's a choice, even if you jerk off to men all day long then having basic dignity is enough to not be a semen slurper in real life



(284.68 KB 1000x1100 1497183250352.jpg)
Sean spicer Anonymous 07/23/2017 (Sun) 05:00:39 [Preview] No. 421 [Reply]
Has anyone seen the SNL skits of Spicer? Sums up why the Trump administration is a pathetic joke on the American people.

(Channeling Sean Spider's voice) "It's not degeneracy when I say It's not."


Anonymous 07/23/2017 (Sun) 05:04:30 [Preview] No. 422 del
AND YOU KNOW IT'S WORKING WHEN SPICER SAYS HIS FEELINGS WERE HURT.
http://www.rollingstone.com/tv/news/sean-spicer-criticizes-malicious-snl-sketches-w493622



Marriage Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 23:32:22 [Preview] No. 417 [Reply]
What is the point of getting married? If the wife isn't happy with you, she can just divorce you and take half your money. If you have a child, you have to pay child support for 18 years of its life. What is the benefit besides "love" which is just marketing bullcrap just to make you pay money for a wedding with a bitch who'll get fat in 5 or less years. Plus, women are manipulative and don't think in terms of loyalty, just emotion. Living alone and fucking random women sounds more desirable then life with a women. I heard non American aren't bad to marry though.


Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 23:39:54 [Preview] No. 418 del
>>417
It's just a powerplay.
To prevent feminism.

A bit too late for it now you cuck.


Anonymous 07/16/2017 (Sun) 00:20:45 [Preview] No. 419 del
>>418
Yeah, modern day society has made marriage a joke, making no one wanting to procreate, eventually leading to death



(4.56 KB 135x90 asdaasdfa.jpg)
white losers Anonymous 07/11/2017 (Tue) 20:32:57 [Preview] No. 401 [Reply]
Fuck all of you racist white bitches. You racist bitches talk all of this racist shit about People of Colour and other minority groups online, but you bitches are too pussy to say it to our faces in real life. You call us "Niggers" and "Shitskins" when most of you are fat virgins. I dare one of you racist bitches to go to a community filled with POC and say the shit that you say. Then we'll see who the real "Master Race" is.
7 posts omitted.


Anonymous 07/12/2017 (Wed) 15:12:49 [Preview] No. 411 del
(241.60 KB 573x346 tbftbh.png)
>>408
goddamn it he's 0% wrong


Anonymous 07/13/2017 (Thu) 08:02:09 [Preview] No. 413 del
>>401
The unpopular Republican party wants to secretly keep you from voting through "voter security" laws and banning exconvicts from ever voting again because so many of you blacks vote Democrats.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/10/jeb-bush-florida-felon-voting-rights-clemency/


Anonymous 07/13/2017 (Thu) 19:07:02 [Preview] No. 414 del
(14.64 MB 1280x720 WHITE MALE.mp4)


Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 18:18:53 [Preview] No. 416 del
>>401
>when most of you are fat virgins.
citation needed.
http://stateofobesity.org/disparities/
>>401
> I dare one of you racist bitches to go to a community filled with POC and say the shit that you say.
Just call them niggers, my undoubtedly white friendo who likes to larp as a non-white.



(69.32 KB 460x349 the-book-cover.jpg)
Anonymous 07/12/2017 (Wed) 15:23:27 [Preview] No. 412 [Reply]
The most common way to accuse hypocricy:

1. Person A is correct about X
2. Person A is wrong about Y
3. Y depends on X
4. Person B says 'you're a hypocrite for thinking wrong about Y when you know what's the case with X! Hypocrites are always wrong!'
5. Person A BTFO, Person B goes along telling everybody the reverse of both X and Y, being wrong about X and correct about Y; is believed; is not called a hyporite



trunk to engine Anonymous 07/08/2017 (Sat) 15:18:23 [Preview] No. 393 [Reply]
Here's the problem with designating sex based on the discovered sequence of the complete genome: it doesn't get rid of the issue of outliers. You pretend it does and that it gives the information that the sexless monsters truly are an outlier, but that's based on a tautological fallacy that assumes a complete mapping of any individual's genome is already finished and applicable. That's not true, what we have is maps starting from only 50 years ago, and a single person's genome is determined to forcefully fit those maps no matter what. We can't with confidence say that a given persons existing X or Y chromosome is indeed the X or Y chromosome we think it is, because we base that assumption on maps that are only our assumption thus far, and eyeball it on the basis of what it resembles more. The only confirmation comes from checking the gender of the parent, but the chromosomal sexes of the mother and father are determined by the same tautology.

If ever in the future we discover that any amount of the average population, even ludicrous amounts like 40%, has in any way out of the "ordinary" sequence of x and Y chromosomes, in a mind informed by your 'skeptic' argumentation we will have to rewrite history as 40% of people always actually having been sexless freaks, or more likely we will be hiding that info like a bunch of jews to protect your ego the same way medical establishment hid the info on washing your hands before operating. That's the fruit of skepticism when it counts, and everything good about skepticism only counts when its a moot point and no real discoveries are being found anyway, while skeptics can confidently repeat "I told you so" about facts that every sane person already knew. Skeptic is a person who only understands base-level doubt, but calls it skepticism to sound smart and applies it everywhere except when they conveniently forget to and start spewing their chosen god delusion in the name of skepticism. At this moment we've determined that where we budge is to insist that a man can have a woman's brain, because we happen to be more religiously confident in that idea than the one that a man can have a woman's vagina. Science thus far has to choose one, and a skeptic can't fall back on both being wrong because he has to be fucking anal about pretending to always have an answer to everything.


Anonymous 07/09/2017 (Sun) 03:39:20 [Preview] No. 396 del
Are you suggesting a form of eugenics we haven't discovered yet, i.e certain men are specifically coded for maximum genetic superiority with certain women, and vice versa?


Anonymous 07/09/2017 (Sun) 16:58:57 [Preview] No. 397 del
We just need to change genetics


Anonymous 07/09/2017 (Sun) 19:44:20 [Preview] No. 398 del
What? The absolute inanity caused by the concept of gender is evident, it's like listening to a nut describe god.

Penis/testicles/testosterone = male/man/masculine
Vagina/ovaries/estrogen = female/woman/feminine
Neither/mix = non applicable/genetically retarded freak, tough shit, I'm sorry, life isn't fair, even with sex change surgery you will never be a real man or woman.

Stop spurging over the word genetics, just because science isn't advanced enough to fully understand how doesn't mean you are not genetically man/woman/other. Example, a percentage of men are genetically recognised as female, we don't understand why they don't have a y chromosome but they are still genetically male.


Anonymous 07/10/2017 (Mon) 01:40:59 [Preview] No. 399 del
>>398
Shit genes lol



Anonymous 06/11/2017 (Sun) 19:58:49 Id: 2e4091 [Preview] No. 19 [Reply]
Why do so many retards consider the Danzig Massacre as the cause of conflict with Poland in WW2? Not just that but they seem to pretend that Hitler wasn't in the wrong by sending instigators to Poland to incite ethnic violence.
64 posts and 147 images omitted.


Anonymous 06/30/2017 (Fri) 11:08:57 [Preview] No. 353 del
(31.85 MB 350x250 The Great Project.webm)


#sj7DAl 06/30/2017 (Fri) 21:09:34 [Preview] No. 356 del
>>318
>You idiot. I was against pollacks since the beginning
Ladies and gentlemen: here you see the devils face. He is trying to d&c stupid germanocuks and pollacks

pollacks people are germanocuks friends and vice verca
while this >>318 faggot is a filthy meanie trying to d&c then


Anonymous 07/01/2017 (Sat) 21:25:27 [Preview] No. 357 del
>>356
>tried to D&C the Vols at /pol/ over and over again
>when failed, he posted jizz all over their faces gay porn and naked niggers
You're a subversive shitstain who never knows how to act like a real man. Do you have any idea what your posts look like to native English speakers?

Everyone who speaks English sees you as a total retard and we laugh at your stupidity


Anonymous 07/01/2017 (Sat) 21:32:02 [Preview] No. 358 del
(71.33 KB 620x455 15557552.jpg)
>>356
Also:
>pollacks people are germanocuks friends and vice verca
>>308
>die, you pollack slav swine

WHAT?


Anonymous 07/04/2017 (Tue) 10:27:56 [Preview] No. 381 del
(2.10 KB 377x220 pl-jews.gif)
In 1931, Poland had the second largest Jewish
population in the world, and one-fifth of all Jews resided within
Poland's borders (approx. 3,136,000, roughly 10% of the entire Polish
population).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_history_of_Poland



Anonymous 07/03/2017 (Mon) 18:46:35 [Preview] No. 379 [Reply]
NIGGER FART LOL



Like to talk to yourself? Anonymous 07/03/2017 (Mon) 05:01:12 [Preview] No. 366 [Reply]
Turn on IDs


Anonymous 07/03/2017 (Mon) 05:09:20 [Preview] No. 367 del
Nah, its just tripfagging to a lesser extent