>>1915
the only thing i can think of is calling them faggots

I am trying to think and essentially boycotting say a large car dealership owned by a mason or any business that affiliates with any masonic lodge.

If its just a random mason then calling the theology of masonry like obedience and stuff that would encourage people to get out.

If they are doing any sort of gesture ask them why they are holding their arms like that etc.
"why are you doing that with your hands"

if you are in public and you shake their hand say something like
"what are you doing to my hands"

Not all masons are bad. Actually, a lot of them, at the low level, are just searching for some "spiritual truth", if it's not just to join some friends club.
That's only a part of it that is criminal, and satanist.
So the problem is a little bite more complicated than that. We should denounce free masonry for what it is, but take care to not hit innocents that a just dumbass who thought that they were any truth in it.

Now, if you see that some people are freemason, find their name, who they are at what post, and share it with us, with local online forums, to let us know who they are. But don't go like a retard screaming it in the street, especially if you're recognisable, and if you work in a field were they can pressure you. I have some exemple, in my country, of local lodge that include the police chief, the judge, the notary etc... who still big house from people by scamming them. This kind of scheme is powerful.

So take care, and use your head. Don't dive like a retard.

>>1936
>who still big house
steal*

>>1936

For the most part that is good advice. If this can surmount the current "its just a boys club" excuse then maybe it can be a self sustaining thing through being open about the scandalous nature of the fraternity.

Thats good advice but I really want to know if there is a way to identify these people like a sub group or something. Is it unfair to presume people in media at all who are freemasons are any less complicit than the "satanic" ones. Its the good people who are being prostituted for their goodness to cover up for vying evil.

The who stuff about obedience makes it very hard to discern the good from the bad. For example if jim is making 9/11 jokes then where does that place him? That literally makes him a cohort of 9/11.

>>1986

The whole stuff about obedience*

Ideally what we need is to outlaw freemasonry as collusion and crime syndicate. Then to keep there tradition alive allow a masonic re-enactment society that they will have to allow the public to view. The oaths would have to be broken to retain citizenship.

Start using the word inclusive when discussing and planting seeds in liberals minds. They are an exclusive white male society that dominates and controls culture and hates gay and trans people.

Every (no longer tax exempt) lodge must have a woman or a minority or a trans person to sit on a throne that is open to the public while they do their public meetings where all kinds of undesirables would then try to loiter around to network with what masons are left. people making petty drug deals in the corners while they read their minutes. Public masonic re-enactment society lodges will be the place for liberals to debate politics with the white dominator culture. They will have their liberal trash shoved in their throats like an ourobouros.

>>1994
>>1936
regardless of debate on the ethical reality that most of them are just faggots and don't really do to much

can we bring the main topic back to the table

>>1995
Of course I was being silly in >>1994 .I imagined things that would upset a mason and thought of a world where masonry had be me-too'd into A public no-membership inclusive lodge, The lodge of a newage. Whoever shows up is the officers of the lodge masonic re-enactment society

>>1996
fuck you

say that if they can't talk about it then they don't know anything. Say that they are wrong theologically and find the most irritating spirit science yt click-bait video as a reference as to why they are wrong spiritually.

ask them to talk like a normal person.

>>4220
that is if they say its raining outside or are sanding down a plunger that doesn't belong to them. do not cower when they do their intimidation routines or little plays. I suppose they need people to be afraid of the fact they are satanists. Mainly because of the brute physicality of shredding humans apart underneath the water underground by the bridge or whatever they do. in fact it builds hatred. It appears to be a religious thing so demeaning the glory of Lucifer would piss off these order following cultists i would imagine.