>>19961
I need to know more about this. Why has my IP, that I only have used on one particular board, having broken no rules to my knowledge,is now useless. Unlike a ban I can't even appeal this error. I want to know if it's an algorithm thing or if other users/board owners can play a part (ie. reporting posts as 'spam' leading to this situation).

I can't see the captcha on tor mirror.

>>29031
Yeah, Tor needs to be fixed. Consider it down for now.

Not sure where else to post this, but can someone fucking do something about the cp spam shit? Letting hardcore cp sit on boards for hours on end is so fucking dysfunctional and pathetic it's insane

>>29536
We delete constantly, or worst case asap.
If it sits on the site for hours then something is preventing us to take action.
Don't open images, don't click on links. Empty browser's cache to remove thumbnails, use private browsing or appropriate browser extensions.
Thank you.

Endchan is a platform. But what a platform is?
A platform - such as Endchan, or Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, Reddit, 4chan, *chan... - is a bus. A mod is the bus driver, a dev is the mechanic, users are the passengers.
If one of the passengers stole the wallet of another passenger who would be liable for the act?
The thief, the road the bus runs on, the other passengers, the bus driver, the mechanic, or the bus itself?

A platform is not a publisher. It's not like a news site, a NGO's website, a personal blog. A platform is a service users can interact with and populate it with content, the publisher is the user.
In legal context a platform is an "interactive computer service" and its liability is regulated by "Section 230" (47 U.S. Code § 230 - https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230).
The freedom of speech is taken very seriously in the United States. If a user generated content was deleted on a platform, the user could claim that his freedom of speech was violated. Section 230 was put in place to grant immunity to platforms for removal content they deem harmful. But to be able to work, grow and be developed they are also not liable for the content users generate.
As Josh put it in an article, the lawmakers provided a sword and a shield for platforms. How I see it they gave them a shield so they can use the sword.

Please note: Section 230 doesn't mandate "interactive computer services" to remove any content. The law only encourages it and protects it.
This was in 1996, and this law made it possible for platforms to thrive. Since then other laws were passed, and future changes can be expected. We will return to them in a later post.

Registered a new nick: Shiban_The_Khan.
I'll unpin this thread soon.

If you seek me out on IRC, write a dm/pm and ask me to post something with the badge on.

>>29546
Ah. I don't think I ever read the reports there. I'm not sure it's working.
You could try setting up a board. There should be some pre-moderation options and ofc can delete. I dunno banning is implemented yet, have to check.

>>29547
Ah, i see. So it's impossible right now, and only BO can delete stuff there. Ok, tnx

Ok, polru is still full of kikes
This song is about eliminating chabad swines and board owner or volunteer remove it
Make desicions or face some consequences

Here we go again...

>>20002
Give us an example.

>>20005
Thanks.

https://endchan.org/agatha2/res/88815.html#q123659
child porn / extorted material
ban the image hashes or they will keep re-posting it

>>20020
All right.

It is an interesting feature.
It is unlikely we'll implement it.

It seems I might wanna pin this thread.

Yes, /agatha2/ and /ashleyj/ need to be removed. The girls which are discussed there were underage at the time and there are underage nudes in various threads on the board. Users will post them and remove them soon afterward or the board owner may remove them but no one is ever banned or reported for posting that content. They use this as a loophole to get away with doing it and there are still nudes of underage girls up on the boards hidden in the various threads.

The board owner of the /ashleyj/ board is a legitimate stalker of that girl who has been stalking her for over seven years and harasses her family members on social media. He regularly posts about it and shares her doxx info on a discord server dedicated to her where most of the /ashleyj/ users congregate. Fair use does not offer legal protections from these activities and they will soon be reported to the proper authorities and the company who hosts endchan if no steps are taken to correct this matter. The law is very clear in the state of Nevada, the U.S. and Switzerland regarding these matters. Switzerland does not offer legal protections to those who engage in the distribution and solicitation of child pornography or the sexual exploitation of minors online and does cooperate with U.S. law enforcement on these matters as anyone can read about with a simple Google search as there have been many convictions the past several years.

I'd also like to state that one of the girls, Ashley, recently returned only asking to take ownership of the board dedicated to her to be able to moderate it and remove her personal information posted there and the explicit photos of her when she was a minor that she shared with her boyfriend at the time which are illegal to have hosted there.

It has recently come to my attention that the anon that is harassing her family and stalking her is also the board owner and refuses to moderate the board or hand over the board so it can be moderated properly and they have posted in their discord server that they have no intention of moderating the board or passing ownership to Ashley simply out of spite because Ashley will not comply with their requests which constitutes as blackmail and is also a crime.

This is a final attempt to notify the owners of the website to correct these issues before further litigation is taken.

>>12110
Basically nothing in this post is true, and it's really obvious that you're 'xmr' and what your motives are here.
None of the girls discussed on /agatha2/ are underage, and there are absolutely not any underage nudes on the board, nor have there been any posted at any point. This is nothing but lies and slander.
The rest of your post is literally fanfiction-tier and not worth addressing.

Important public service announcement

>>12115
>None of the girls discussed on /agatha2/ are underage
This aged well.

this is a good thing

wanting privacy=/=being sus

love endchan, the only imageboard that both works without JS and at the same time is not ridden with CP

sdf

All I can say after spending years on imageboards is that you have to be completely braindead if you can be doxed by either the users or the admins of a site. Basic web hygiene rules, VPN, private tabs, OPSEC, these are all bottom of the barrel basic shit we have been talking about in ages. If you haven't got the hint yet, you deserve to get your house covered in toilet paper and your elderly mother digitally harassed by mentally ill men.

Yeah that and don't be a fucking pedophile terrorist. I'm still mad about that faggot tarrant that had to ruin the good parts of 8chan for his mentally ill /pol/ buddies. Those retards belong to a mental asylum, not imageboards.

my image didn't post the first time so... ^
|

/b/?

can i have sex with your genitals?

>>29505
Can you use my mouth as your personal cum dump? ^-^