where is their love? GOD or $$$
who are their friends
early life and career
federal connections
royalty connections
vendors/conections/contributors
companies invested
whats their stand on issues [ethics]
whats their fails (vids encouraged)
Romance
Religion
Language connections
Country Connections
affiliations...

Dough: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine

No paywall.

Ousted Ukrainian Leader Yanukovych Found Guilty of Treason
By Aliaksandr Kudrytski
January 24, 2019, 4:07 AM CST Updated on January 24, 2019, 9:35 AM CST

A Kiev court found ex-Ukrainian leader Viktor Yanukovych guilty in absentia of treason in the wake of the country’s deadly revolution in 2014, sentencing him 13 years in prison.

The conviction relates to a letter Yanukovych allegedly sent to President Vladimir Putin five years ago requesting he send Russian troops to Ukraine to assist his government. Kremlin-backed Yanukovych, who fled to Russia following the demonstrations, has repeatedly professed his innocence.

“Yanukovych signed and submitted to Russian President Vladimir Putin a request to use Russian armed forces on the territory of Ukraine, thus assisting Russia in conducting undermining activities against Ukraine,” Judge Vladyslav Devyatko said Thursday in televised comments.

The revolution was triggered when Yanukovych, under pressure from Russia, suddenly abandoned plans to sign an integration pact with the European Union. While the protests began peacefully, dozens of people were killed by snipers in the center of the capital in February 2014. To date, no one’s been convicted for those deaths.

As an EU-friendly administration was in the process of taking power, Putin used the power vacuum as a chance to swipe Crimea from Ukraine. He’s since fomented a conflict on the two former allies’ border which persists to this day.

Since being deposed, Yanukovych has hit the headlines for other reasons as news came to light that he’d previously employed Paul Manafort, the disgraced former campaign chief of U.S. President Donald Trump.

July 30, 2014
The Media Ignores the CIA in Ukraine
by Bill Blunden

A few days back the Economist published an essay which dismissed the idea of fascists in Kiev as an illusory product of Russian propaganda[1]. This is a narrative which the editors at the Economist have put forth on a number of occasions[2]. Of course they’re not alone. A less flagrant article published by the New York Times editorial board used a weird double negative to assert that “Russian leaders prefer not to accept that the C.I.A. did not engineer the preference of many Ukrainians for what they see in the West[3].”

All the world’s a stage wrote Shakespeare. Are readers supposed to categorically assume that U.S. intelligence has played absolutely no role in the coup d’état? So far the bulk of the American media’s coverage of the Ukraine deftly sidesteps the CIA’s role.

Yet all of the signs are there. Former CIA Officer John Stockwell explained that “stirring up deadly ethnic and racial strife has been a standard technique used by the CIA.[4]” Students of history (e.g. Iran, Guatemala, Indonesia, Chile, and Nicaragua) will also recognize many of the hallmarks of a covert destabilization operation.

Witness senator John McCain sharing a stage with Oleh Tyahnybok in the early days of the coup[5], CIA director Brennan’s discreet visit to the Ukraine (buried near the end of a Reuters brief)[6], the taped phone call where Victoria Nuland essentially selects who would replace the deposed president[7], or the disproportionate number of high-level officials in the new government linked to neo-fascist groups.

moar here: https://www.counterpunch.org/2014/07/30/the-media-ignores-the-cia-in-ukraine/

CIA in the Ukraine
Here:

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17570-skin-growths-saved-poisoned-ukrainian-president/

Reminder

US Embassy pressed Ukraine to drop probe of George Soros group during 2016 election
By John Solomon, opinion contributor — 03/26/19 06:00 PM EDT

While the 2016 presidential race was raging in America, Ukrainian prosecutors ran into some unexpectedly strong headwinds as they pursued an investigation into the activities of a nonprofit in their homeland known as the Anti-Corruption Action Centre (AntAC).

The focus on AntAC — whose youthful street activists famously wore “Ukraine F*&k Corruption” T-shirts — was part of a larger probe by Ukraine’s Prosecutor General’s Office into whether $4.4 million in U.S. funds to fight corruption inside the former Soviet republic had been improperly diverted.

video of interview here:

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/435906-us-embassy-pressed-ukraine-to-drop-probe-of-george-soros-group-during-2016

Mueller Investigation
Manafort’s pro-Ukraine lobbying campaign reached Obama, Biden

By MARIANNE LEVINE

09/14/2018 01:24 PM EDT


Paul Manafort’s pro-Ukraine campaign reached the top of the White House, with one of the members of his lobbying effort meeting President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden in 2013, according to new court documents released Friday.

A member of the so-called Hapsburg Group, which comprised former European politicians Manafort convened as part of his lobbying effort in support of Ukraine’s then-President Viktor Yanukovych, came with a foreign prime minister on May 16, 2013, to meet with Obama and Biden, “as well as senior United States officials in the executive and legislative branches,” according to the court documents.

Alan Friedman, a former journalist based in Europe who helped Manafort launch the group, told Manafort after the meeting that the member of the Hapsburg Group “delivered the message of not letting ‘Russians steal Ukraine from the West,’” prosecutors say.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/14/manafort-ukraine-obama-biden-824747

LB REMINDER

>>22302
Poroshenko.
I put out a call to dig yesterday, it has been referenced several times.
What information can you find?
Use Ukranian news sources.
https://translate.yandex.com

'In 2006, President Victor Yushchenko attached high priority to securing a NATO membership action plan (MAP). By summer, Kyiv looked on course to attain a MAP when alliance foreign ministers met that December. Curiously, Moscow did not come out hard against the idea. The prospective MAP derailed, however, after Yushchenko appointed Victor Yanukovych as prime minister. During a September visit to Brussels, Yanukovych said he did not want a MAP. The proposal died given the divided position of Ukraine’s executive branch.

Yushchenko called for a MAP again in January 2008, this time with the support of Prime Minister Yuliya Tymoshenko and Rada (parliament) Speaker Arseniy Yatseniuk. Moscow came out in full opposition. When Yushchenko visited the Russian capital that February, he had to stand alongside and listen to President Vladimir Putin threaten to target nuclear missiles on Ukraine. Instead of lobbying allies to support a MAP for Kyiv, Washington waited until the April Bucharest summit, where President George W. Bush attempted to persuade his counterparts to grant Ukraine (and Georgia) a MAP. However, a number of allied leaders by then had made up their minds and opposed the idea. Concern about Russian opposition undoubtedly played a role.'
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2019/06/06/natos-ukraine-challenge/

>>23642 lativia
>>23656 >>23672 cyprus
>>23685 cyrpus history
>>23791 Ukraine Lativia Cyprus

Mykola Zlochevsky

Mykola Vladislavovich Zlochevsky (Ukrainian: Микола Владиславович Злочевський; born June 14, 1966 in Kiev) is a Ukrainian oligarch[1] businessman and politician who was Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources from July 2010 till April 2012 and was the deputy secretary for Economic and Social Security on the National Security and Defense Council from April 2012 until February 2014 when Euromaidan occurred.[2][3][4]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mykola_Zlochevsky

>why was biden trying to protect him

>>23766 House Ukraine Caucus Resolution Against Russia in PACE Introduced

Use Ukranian news sources.
https://translate.yandex.com

#9444

>>25110 >>25112 >>25113 >>25114 >>25115 ukraine corruption
>>25143 >>25148 Doing some research on Ukraine fuckery re: Graham
>>25173 The Plundering Of Ukraine By Corrupt American Democrats
>>25180 President Zelensky

>>30802

[Part 2]

And President Zelensky? Is he free from Clintonite Democrats’ influence?

If he were, there would not be the scandal of Trump phone call. How the Democrats learned of this call and its alleged content? The official version says there was a CIA man, a whistle-blower, who reported to the Democrats. What the version does not clarify, where this whistle-blower was located during the call. I tell you, he was located in Kiev, and he was present at the conversation, at the Ukrainian President Zelensky’s side. This man was (perhaps) a CIA asset, but he also was a close associate of George Soros, and a Ukrainian high-ranking official. His name is Mr Alexander Daniluk. He is also the man the investigation of Sam Kislin and of the DoJ had led to, the Finance Minister of Ukraine at the time, the man who was responsible for the embezzlement of three billion US taxpayer’s best dollars. The DoJ issued an order for his arrest. Naturally he is devoted to Biden personally, and to the Dems in general. I would not trust his version of the phone call at all.

Daniluk was supposed to accompany President Zelensky on his visit to Washington; but he was informed that there is an order for his arrest. He remained in Kiev. And soon afterwards, the hell of the alleged leaked phone call broke out. Zelensky administration investigated and concluded that the leak was done by Mr Alexander Daniluk, who is known for his close relations with George Soros and with Mr Biden. Alexander Daniluk had been fired. (However, he did not admit his guilt and said the leak was done by his sworn enemy, the head of president’s administration office, Mr Andrey Bogdan, who allegedly framed Daniluk.)

This is not the only case of US-connected corruption in Ukraine. ...

I was a university student in 1991 taking an upper level course. Geography of the Soviet Union. Recognize by the date while taking this course the USSR was falling apart. Exciting times...one of the last lectures was what happens with Ukraine and The Crimea. I never forget my prof said that there are two place that Russia will go to war Crimea and Syria. So forward to today. USA backs overthrow of Yanukovych. Russia takes Crimea and starts war in the industrial heartland of Ukraine. All the while USA does not deliver on military aide. I have a hard time believing that USA intel and pentagon had no idea Putin would make this move. I knew it. So my belief is Obama Admin sold you out. They took kickbacks from our loan deals and Putin paid them to Screw you over. Time for Ukraine Patriots and USA Patriots to UNITE. Expose Biden-Obama C..A crimes.

>>34885
It was reported that during the Ukraine coup cellphones with US cell phone numbers where falling out of the back pockets of the violent " protesters." It is more than just a guess that the US was involved in the coup. Ukraine needed to be another operational territory for money laundering ( the IMF) established there at this time). There was already human trafficking going on at the ports and train stations. I believe that front companies and the banking system in general were as crooked as the day is long, hence we have Hunter Biden jumping aboard corporations like he was jumping on a bus. It was that easy for him. Nobody at the time was paying any attention to what the political families were doing as they trailed their parents from country to country. Romania, China, Ukraine and who knows where else. A great cover, look at Nancy, not her son, etc. They have had a free ride for decades but with help, the new dawn being ushered in by people who actually care about others will take them all down.

New Q!

REMINDER:
USA has had a treaty with Ukraine to root out corruptionhttps://www.congress.gov/treaty-document/106th-congress/16/document-text

https://creativedestructionmedia.com/investigations/2019/11/12/here-are-the-payments-to-hunter-biden-leaked-from-ukraine/

Here Are The Payments To Hunter Biden, Leaked From Ukraine
by CD Media Staff
November 12, 2019

The information below has been leaked from the Ukrainian General Prosecutor’s office and acquired from intelligence sources within Ukraine; it is part of investigative materials acquired during an investigation into Biden corruption. As CD Media has reported previously, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau Of Ukraine (NABU) has succeeded in shutting down all investigations into Hunter Biden, Joseph Biden, Burisma owner Mykola Zlochevskiy, former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, and former Polish President Aleksander Kwasniewskiy. NABU is controlled by Obama/Soros linked operatives and was created to coverup Democrat, Biden, Deep State, State Department corruption during the Obama Administration and the years after in which this cabal went after duly-elected President Trump.

Prosecutors who desire the information to get out in spite of the Deep State’s efforts to prevent such a release and prevent investigations to continue, have leaked to CD Media.

The highlighted sections describe:

According to the Department of Financial Monitoring (Counter-intelligence) of Latvia, the following sums of money were obtained from Busima Holding Limited (Cyprus) to the account of Burisma Holding Limited (Cyprus) which is open at AS PrivatBank in Latvia: money transfer of 14 655 982 US Dollars and 366 015 EUR from the company “Wirelogic Technology AS”, and 1 9 64 375 US dollars from “Digitex Organization LLP” based on the credit agreements. (Note: credit agreements here mean “intra-company” transactions to decrease the taxes to be paid or “credit agreement” also serve as means of hidden dividend payments).

Further, the part of the sums described above, the money was transferred to Alan Apter (302 885 EUR), Alexander Kwasniewski (1 150 000 EUR), Devon Archer and Hunter Biden.

[Moar at website]

Biden Ukraine Rosemont Seneca >>36106 >>36107 >>36109 >>36113 >>36138

Text of the PDF in Q drop 3590
2 of ...3?

FARA requires individuals to register with the Justice Department if they act, even
through an intermediary, “as an agent, representative, employee, or servant” or “in any other capacity” at the behest of a foreign principal, including a foreign political party, for purposes of
engagement with a United States official.8
The registration applies to anyone who attempts to influence a U.S. government official on behalf of a foreign principal in an effort to “formulat[e], adopt[], or chang[e] the domestic or foreign policies of the United States.”9 As such, the focus of FARA is to require registration for individuals engaged in political or quasi-political activity on behalf of a foreign government. Likewise, an individual whose activities are subject to registration under FARA and who sends informational material “for or in the interest of [a] foreign principal” with the intent or belief that such material will be circulated among at least two persons must transmit the material to the Attorney General no later than 48 hours after actual transmission.10 Notably, an ongoing failure to register is an ongoing offense.11

According to documents provided to the Committee, the Justice Department required the Podesta Group and Mercury LLC to register under FARA for working on behalf of the Ukrainian government.12 Their registration was required even though the client, the European Centre for the Modern Ukraine (ECFMU), wrote a letter saying it was not directly or indirectly controlled by the Ukrainian government. That did not matter to the Justice Department because their lobbying activity was not to “benefit commercial interests” of the ECFMU but instead to promote the “political or public interests of a foreign government or foreign political party.” The Justice Department made clear that an individual acting in the political or public interests of a foreign government must register under FARA. As such, because Podesta and Mercury were effectively working on behalf of Ukrainian government interests, they were required to register.

Unlike that situation where the Podesta Group and Mercury LLC worked for the
middleman (EFCMU) and not the Ukrainian government, here Chalupa reportedly worked
directly with Ukrainian government officials to benefit Ukraine, lobbying Congress on behalf of Ukraine, and worked to undermine the Trump campaign on behalf of Ukraine and the Clinton campaign. Accordingly, these facts appear to be exactly the type of activity Congress intended to reach with FARA. Please answer the following:

1. What actions has the Justice Department taken to enforce FARA’s requirements
regarding Chalupa given the public reporting of her actions on behalf of the Ukrainian government?

2. Why has the Justice Department not required her to register under FARA?

3. Has the Justice Department sent a letter of inquiry to Chalupa? If so, please provide a copy. If not, why not?

4. Under 28 C.F.R. § 5.2, any present or prospective agent of a foreign entity may request an advisory opinion from the Justice Department regarding the need to register. Has Chalupa ever requested one in relation to her work on behalf of the Ukrainian
government? If so, please provide a copy of the request and opinion.

5. Please differentiate the facts that required the Podesta Group and Mercury LLC to register with Chalupa’s.

6. Are you investigating the Ukrainian government’s intervention in the 2016 presidential election on behalf of the Clinton campaign? If not, why not?

7. Are you investigating links and coordination between the Ukrainian government and individuals associated with the campaign of Hillary Clinton or the Democratic National
Committee? If not, why not?

Text of the PDF in Q drop 3590
3 of ...3 yeah 3

I anticipate that your written response and the responsive documents will be unclassified. Please send all unclassified material directly to the Committee. In keeping with the requirements of Executive Order 13526, if any of the responsive documents do contain classified information, please segregate all unclassified material within the classified documents, provide all unclassified information directly to the Committee, and provide a classified addendum to the Office of Senate Security. The Committee complies with all laws and regulations governing the handling of classified information. The Committee is not bound, absent its prior agreement, by any handling restrictions or instructions on unclassified information unilaterally asserted by the Executive Branch.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation with this request. Please respond no later than August 3, 2017. If you have questions, contact Josh Flynn-Brown of my Judiciary Committee staff at (202) blah blah blah

PDF saws:
https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/constituents/2017-07-20%20CEG%20to%20DOJ%20%28Ukraine%20DNC%20FARA%29.pdf