>>6382
While rats are among the few people who take ideas seriously enough that just making a reasoned argument to do something has a chance to actually make them do it, you might have trouble taking that route since a lot of rats have thought about it and have their own ideas about whether the rationalist birthrate should rise or not.

Probably more plausible is to promote rationalism in areas with higher birthrates. Not likely to recruit any subsaharan africans to a subculure with an average IQ in the 140s, but there's probably groups you could target that breed faster than the existing demography of WEIRDos, atheist Jews, and autogynephilic transwomen.

>>6383
So who are you suggesting? The red tribe?

if we're so smart why aren't we inventing exowombs then factory farm transhuman geniuses designer babies?

>>6408
Mormons

>>6382
Have sex

>>6533
I believe an evolutionarily stable response has been found to "have sex"-posting. It is "bend over"-posting. It doesn't quite work in the context of reproduction, though.

Per the sister thread, I believe the solution is widespread gene editing to give the general population williams syndrome.

I don't really even care any more. Evolution selects against knowledge of evolution.

Let's all do STEM and produce AGI or transhumans. Better a bot world than a tropicalized world.

lower the AOC

>>6382
you're making a lot of assumptions about what's good for the future of humanity there.

>>6536
"Dilate" seems to have won out as a response. Have you seen this, have you heard about this?