/g/ - Technolo/g/y

No encryption or P2P talk

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Catalog | Bottom

Expand All Images


(12.30 KB 236x314 feris.jpg)
the hacker known as 4chan 03/12/2021 (Fri) 05:40:08 [Preview] No. 81
Xonotic removes "team members" (developer) for insulting people.

><divVerent> Well... strong words are not disallowed, but using strong words to insult others (players or developers alike) falls under invective.
><divVerent> Like, you can call a core gameplay mechanic of first person shooters "shitscan" all you like, that's allowed.
><divVerent> But the moment you attack the people, a line has been crossed.

This is what you get for contributing code etc to opensource: Judged and "sanctioned". You're seen as no-better than a non-contributor/player.

> https://forums.xonotic.org/showthread.php?tid=8522
> https://xonotic.devfull.de/xonvote:27500/poll/405

--

divVerent supports sawing off the dicks of kids
"if a doctor approves"
><divVerent> if a doctor diagnoses a condition that can be helped by SRS, and "whoever is legally responsible" (depending on age and jurisdiction, parent and/or child) consents
><divVerent> there's no problem
><mini> wasnt that famous kid jazz reassigned as a kid?
><divVerent> that's just HIS JOB

--

Xonotic main dev:
>Rudolf Polzer - Senior Software Engineer - Google
>https://www.linkedin.com/in/rudolf-polzer-99122418

Engine developer chopped his dick and balls off:
> Ashley Hale - Software Engineer - DarkPlaces
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashley-hale-7723648
This person used to be Forest Hale. Works at Google now. Joined Google before Rudolf Polzer did. Probably got him in.


the hacker known as 4chan 03/12/2021 (Fri) 05:47:58 [Preview] No.82 del
(23.30 KB 300x300 feriss.jpg)
>However, nonexclusive licenses are revocable (meaning the copyright owner can revoke the license at any time) in the absence of consideration.
>https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/creating-written-contract-transfer-or-license-rights-under-copyright

> [...] The most plausible assumption is that a developer who releases
> code under the GPL may terminate GPL rights, probably at will.
> --David McGowan, Professor of Law, University of Minnesota Law School:

>p278 "Notice that in a copyright dispute over a bare license, the
>plaintiff will almost certainly be the copyright owner. If a licensee
>were foolish enough to sue to enforce the terms and conditions of the
>license, the licensor can simply revoke the bare license, thus ending
>the dispute. Remeber that a bare license in the absence of an interest
>is revocable."
>--Lawrence Rosen
>https://www.amazon.com/Open-Source-Licensing-Software-Intellectual/dp/013148787


the hacker known as 4chan 04/04/2021 (Sun) 05:20:22 [Preview] No.88 del
Are you actually surprised assholes get kicked off a team? Come on.



Top | Return | Catalog | Post a reply