I assume the answer is no by definition but I've heard people giving examples of ontologically objective things that I have no means to confirm are true.

Roses are red
my blood too
but true answer is....
Who is Jack Potato?

how does here it work? i dont see much things, but many things, i dont get it all after all all i have is this message

im im terribly sorry for being a cancer
wheres the fun things? i mean, childrem, woman, police, accidents, end of the world plan, reallifethings acts. and so on and on and on and on,

but ill be gone soon, im just having fun, i dont need to cum, im kinda a num, but just guy whois numb,

and remember, dont commit crimes.

I've long been one to roll with the admittedly fence-sitter position that morality is subjective, at least in the sense that it can be justified. Deontology is too rigid, and most people will abandon their deontological principles when faced with sufficient reason anyways. And utilitarianism attempts to weight incomparable things -- also, it's been co-opted by a ton of leftist movements to justify famines in the pursuit of good policy. What do you guys think qualifies something as moral personally? Do you disagree that no objective morality exists? Sorry if this has already been posted.

What does it all mean?

Why are you movingto endchan. Whqt is so great here.

is this the 8philosophy bo? fukken 1 get