/ratanon/ - Rationalists Anonymous

Remember when /ratanon/ was good?

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)

Board Rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Magrathea | Catalog | Bottom

Expand All Images


(34.16 KB 959x424 dicklet.jpg)
Anonymous 08/13/2019 (Tue) 13:14:36 [Preview] No. 6636
How does /ratanon/ feel about race mixing?

In my view, there is race mixing and there there's race mixing. There is nothing wrong if a White man wants to breed with an East Asian, Ashkenazim Jew, or Brahmin Indian female; those are all civilized people, and the resulting offspring will be every bit the equal of a pure white baby.

On the other hand, when a White female hooks up with a Black man, we all know that she's on the fast track to single motherhood. Even if you disregard that, the resulting mongrel will likely be the average IQ of the mother and father; why would you dilute your precious genes like that?

In conclusion, interbreeding among civilized races is fine. Letting your daughter hook up with Tyrone is not fine.


Anonymous 08/13/2019 (Tue) 13:14:53 [Preview] No.6637 del
Why post this kind of racist junk? It's just stupid…


Anonymous 08/13/2019 (Tue) 13:16:02 [Preview] No.6639 del
(322.64 KB 844x530 MPfi2J0.png)
Your concerns are largely unsubstantiated.

Even if you're somewhat ethnocentric, the projection of US racial fertility trends by Edmonston et al for 2100 doesn't seem worrying:

38.8% white
30.6% Hispanic
15.6% black
14.9% Asian and Pacific Islander
1% American Indian

Out of all 550 million US citizens, the absolute number of white people will be only a few million less than today, 209 million.

If you're more concerned about the nation-wide effects of decline in average IQ and dysgenics: Richard Lynn estimates that US lose 0.9 IQ points per generation. By 2100, Americans will have lost on average 4 IQ points. Improved healthcare and mind-enhancing technologies should easily compensate for this loss, and by this time we'll be probably either cyborgs or dead.

I understand that imageboards should be permissive to edgy content, but "targeting individuals because they belong to specific ethnic groups" is the literal definition of "racism" and has a very poor historical record in making societies better. It also puts other important submissions (black pill, dramas in the rationalist community) in a bad light.


Anonymous 08/13/2019 (Tue) 13:16:51 [Preview] No.6642 del
>>6639
> If you're more concerned about the nation-wide effects of decline in average IQ and dysgenics: Richard Lynn estimates that US lose 0.9 IQ points per generation. By 2100, Americans will have lost on average 4 IQ points. Improved healthcare and mind-enhancing technologies should easily compensate for this loss, and by this time we'll be probably either cyborgs or dead.

This isn't how it works. Difference in 4 points on average translates into extreme decline in numbers of greatly intelligent people who actually animate the economy. Or, in other words, this means US will come to completely depend on Jews for guidance and Asian countries for production.


Anonymous 08/13/2019 (Tue) 13:19:00 [Preview] No.6648 del
>>6642
How does the average loss of 4 IQ points exactly translate into the declining number of 120+ IQ individuals? Could you estimate the effects on GDP and HDI, and should we really worry given the likely progress in embryo selection and brain upgrading tech?

I assume that the high-IQ groups (coastal whites, Jews, Asians) pair bond mostly within these groups, so there's little "IQ dilution". On the other hand, high IQ men may be the first to gain a better understanding of risks related to modern dating and marriage, deciding to remain childless and disconnect from the society.


Anonymous 08/13/2019 (Tue) 13:19:36 [Preview] No.6650 del
>>6648

Here's an example of relevant calculation.
https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/4t8tgl/question_about_the_ashkenazi_iq_hypothesis/d5ktie6/

> Could you estimate the effects on GDP and HDI
I could estimate the decline in human capital to somewhere between current US and current Mexico.

> and should we really worry given the likely progress in embryo selection and brain upgrading tech?
Absolutely; reliance on non-existent and possibly politically untenable science woo that depends on current rate of progress is irresponsible. I do hope for these developments myself, though.

> I assume that the high-IQ groups (coastal whites, Jews, Asians) pair bond mostly within these groups
Indeed, they bond mostly within these groups with sub-replacement fertility. Also, I'm vehemently against complete replacement of high-IQ Whites with psychopathic half-breeds who will rant about their bar mitzvah, superiority of mixed race marriage, moral necessity of abortion and how the future is poly.


Anonymous 08/13/2019 (Tue) 13:19:52 [Preview] No.6651 del
>>6650
>superiority of mixed race marriage
If you're lucky. The ironic hell scenario is the one where they end up ranting about racial purity.


Anonymous 08/13/2019 (Tue) 14:39:11 [Preview] No.6661 del
>Letting your daughter hook up with Tyrone is not fine.
Thank you. Although this bit is meant as a bit of a joke, but goddamn do some people conflate looking down upon letting girls hookup with ghetto blacks with racism. I certainly wouldn't let me daughter hookup with a white trash useless fucker either (or preferably anyone of that nature).


Anonymous 08/13/2019 (Tue) 14:44:02 [Preview] No.6662 del
>How does /ratanon/ feel about race mixing?

I think the Indy 500 could be greatly improved if paired with a woman's triathlon.


Anonymous 08/13/2019 (Tue) 14:45:16 [Preview] No.6663 del
>>6662
Thank you, very high-quality post


Anonymous 01/25/2020 (Sat) 21:00:06 [Preview] No.6759 del
race mixing is colonization, and therefore good. the problem with white sluts getting knocked up by deadbeat black guys isn't that it's "race mixing".



Top | Catalog | Post a reply | Magrathea | Return