/news/ - News

News & Current Events + Happenings

Boards | Catalog | Bottom

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Drawing x size canvas

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

News & Current Events + Happenings

Good! World’s Youngest Leader Vows To Kick Pedophiles Out Of Politics Reader 10/24/2017 (Tue) 02:36:39 Id: d72919 [Preview] No. 2651 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Disgusted by EU Parliament plans to reduce the age of consent in Europe from 16 to 13, brave Sebastian Kurz has vowed to launch a high-level European pedophile ring investigation, with “severe punishments” for anyone in positions of power revealed to be abusing children.

Sebastian Kurz, the world’s youngest elected leader, studied secret societies and the real nature of the world using YouTube and conspiracy forums, and he plans to put his knowledge to good use.

“Anyone caught engaged in this diabolical practice will be dealt with in the severest way, with especially harsh punishments for those found to be abusing positions of power and influence,” the Austrian leader said.

Responding to claims that many top politicians are pedophiles, Kurz said “This may be so” and acknowledged that he has heard that “a kind of mafia exists” in which elite pedophiles protect each other, while being protected and exploited in turn by their own masters.

“This behavior stops now. My colleagues and I have agreed we cannot go to our graves without eradicating this evil from society.

“This is our duty.”

31-year-old Sebastian Kurz became the youngest world leader when he was elected by an Austrian public tired of the corrupt political class lying, cheating, stealing – and raping their young.

A series of child sex scandals have rocked Austrian political circles, while the nation’s mainstream media, owned by a corrupt oligarchy, has remained silent when it comes to exposing the abusers.

But Kurz grew up in the digital age and he has educated himself using forums and YouTube videos regarding the power structures that control the world. The world’s youngest elected leader is determined to dismantle the pedophile network that has infiltrated European politics.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

Reader 10/24/2017 (Tue) 03:07:51 Id: d72919 [Preview] No. 2652 del
About time.

Reader 10/24/2017 (Tue) 04:20:04 Id: b12e4a [Preview] No. 2653 del
Hitler's back?

Reader 10/24/2017 (Tue) 06:59:05 [Preview] No. 2657 del
antipedo is antiwhite

Reader 10/24/2017 (Tue) 13:26:53 Id: db1380 [Preview] No. 2659 del
Good. Age of consent should not be lowered, it should be raised to as high as 28 until the whole scam breaks down and they have to start actually proving damages in any rape cases in general.

Reader 10/24/2017 (Tue) 13:28:25 Id: db1380 [Preview] No. 2660 del
Kurz of course is one of the people all too happy if rapes keep getting prosecuted on purely a statutory basis with nobody proving shit.

Number of New Government Regulations Under Trump Near ZERO Reader 10/24/2017 (Tue) 02:09:34 Id: a00a6f [Preview] No. 2650 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
The government has added an average of 13,000 new restrictions annually for the past 20 years. Under Trump, the number of new regulations is near zero.

In a speech on October 11 promoting his tax-reform plan, Donald Trump spoke rosily of America’s economic revival, crediting himself for having cleared the way for growth. “Since January of this year, we have slashed job-killing red tape all across our economy,” the president said. “We have stopped or eliminated more regulations in the last eight months than any president has done during an entire term. It’s not even close.”

It seemed a characteristic bit of Trumpian magniloquence—he’s not only a boffo deregulator, he’s the best ever! Still, it was a remarkable claim. Trump has overseen more deregulation than George W. Bush or Ronald “government is the problem” Reagan?

But, measured by at least one significant standard, Trump’s claim is true. Patrick McLaughlin of the Mercatus Center, a free-market-oriented think tank at George Mason University, applies innovative research techniques to the study of regulation and the economy. He recently analyzed the output of regulatory restrictions promulgated in the last several presidencies, going back to Jimmy Carter. McLaughlin found that there have been periods in some presidencies when regulatory output slowed or declined—in several years of the Reagan presidency, for instance, and in 1996, when “reinventing government” was part of Bill Clinton’s election pitch. But over the full terms of each recent president, including Reagan, regulation increased, according to McLaughlin. So far the increase in regulatory restrictions under Trump has been near to zero.

“So in that sense, the president may be right,” the economist reports. “There may not be a net increase in regulations so far under him, and since there was a net increase in every four-year term for every preceding president, going back to the ’70s, then I think that could be a safe statement.”

It’s a reminder that in this distraction-a-minute presidency, it can be useful to distinguish between the person of the president, who has no discernible ideology, and his presidency, which, so far, has been strikingly conservative.


Robert Mueller Invested In Hedge Funds Linked to Russia and George Soros Reader 10/23/2017 (Mon) 16:24:15 Id: 23efda [Preview] No. 2630 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Robert Mueller Invested In Hedge Funds Linked to Russia and George Soros


BACKGROUND INFO: https://archive.fo/5Zhri
RELATED THREADS: >>>/news/2464 ; >>>/news/2497

Robert Mueller’s complex financial entanglements include investments linked to George Soros and Russia. During Mueller’s tenure at the FBI, high profile cases of financial wrongdoing within hedge funds that he invested in were ignored by federal law enforcement.

An Offended America investigation has revealed that Robert Mueller’s holdings in a fund of funds expose him to Russian investments and to hedge funds tied to George Soros. Mueller’s exclusive hedge funds were not open to the general public, but rather wealthy private accredited investors. The minimum investment in several of the funds is $10 Million.

Mueller’s Russian Financial Interests

Mueller has been an investor in Mellon Optima L/S Strategy Fund, LLC for many years, according to his financial disclosures. That fund consists of holdings of other hedge funds in a structure commonly referred to as a “fund of funds”.

According to 2017 SEC Filings, one of the funds held by the Mellon Optima L/S Strategy Fund is the OCCO Eastern European Fund, run by Charlemagne Capital. The fund released a performance overview on August 31st that said in part:

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

1 post omitted.

Reader 10/23/2017 (Mon) 16:25:27 Id: 23efda [Preview] No. 2632 del
“Ivy Asset Management”, as it was known at the time, fed clients into Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi Scheme and eventually paid $200 million to settle complaints associated with alleged misconduct surrounding this investment. The FBI never investigated any of the people or entities associated with the Defenders Multistrategy hedge fund or other funds that Mueller has invested in.

The hedge fund at the center of these allegations of wrongdoing never faced investigations from the FBI, and produced profits for Robert Mueller, who headed up the FBI when the allegations were made, prompting the SEC began their investigation.

The US Department of Justice launched wide-ranging investigations into many of the “feeder funds” that put client money with Bernie Madoff. BNY Mellon’s Madoff feeder funds for which Robert Mueller had a financial interest remained completely untouched by the FBI and DOJ.

These facts spark suspicions that Mueller intentionally turned a blind eye to wrongdoing at the BNY Mellon fund, in order to protect his financial interest in the fund.

Soros Ties

In 2013, Mueller was invested with a fund of funds called Mellon Optima. Mellon Optima invested a portion its funds in Karsch Capital a fund managed by Michael Karsh, who worked for Soros Fund Management before leaving the firm in 2000, according to Reuters. Stanley Druckenmiller, the trader who infamously broke the Bank of England, netting over $1 billion in a single day when he worked alongside George Soros, personally provided seed capital to Karsch Capital.

SEC Disclosures reveal that the fund of funds that Mueller holds, Mellon Optima, also invested in Highbridge Long/Short Equity Fund. Alec McAree, who is the Managing Director of Highbridge, previously worked as a Managing Director for Soros Fund Management according to a Highbridge press release: https://archive.fo/l8gXI

Alex Soros, son of hedge fund billionaire and anti-Trump money-man George Soros, revealed his close relationship with New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman in an Instagram post. Politico previously reported that Mueller has teamed up with New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s office. Sources told Politico that Schneiderman is currently working together with Mueller in an investigation regarding the financial dealings of President Trump and members of the 2016 Trump Campaign.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

Reader 10/23/2017 (Mon) 16:25:43 Id: 23efda [Preview] No. 2633 del
Uranium One

In 2006 the Department of Energy, which oversees the United States’ nuclear technology, confiscated highly enriched uranium from a smuggling operation involving one Russian firm and several Georgian companies.

In August 2009, Wikileaks released a classified State Department cable which showed the details of this transfer of highly enriched uranium.

The Hill recently reported that as soon as Hillary Clinton became Obama’s Secretary of State, FBI counterintelligence agents observed Russian operatives successfully attempting to gain influence with Bill and Hillary Clinton’s inner circle. The activity that took place appeared to be criminal in nature, according to FBI counterintelligence agents familiar with the matter.

Russia requested a ten-gram sample of a batch of highly enriched uranium (HEU) seized in early 2006 in Georgia during a nuclear smuggling sting operation involving one Russian national and several Georgian co-conspirators. The seized uranium was transferred to U.S. custody and was being held at a secure Department of Energy facility. In response to the Russian request, the Georgian Government authorized the United States to share a sample of the material with the Russians for forensic analysis.

Wikileaks showed as early as 2009 that Hillary Clinton’s state department began facilitating the transport of samples of high enriched uranium to members of the Russia’s intelligence service, the FSB. The person tasked to transport the highly enriched uranium to the FSB was none other than Robert Mueller.

Wikileaks’ release of classified State Department wires showed in part:

“Director Mueller previously planned to deliver the sample in April (Ref A), but due to a scheduling conflict the trip was canceled. Embassy Moscow LegAtt informed the FSB prior to Mueller’s intended April delivery and received confirmation that the FSB would take custody of the sample after the Director’s plane landed. EST Moscow also informed Rosatom of the planned transfer and that the U.S. placed a high priority on completing this transfer (Ref B). Once the LegAtt told FSB counterparts the April trip had been canceled, Ambassador Beyrle informed Igor Neverov (Ref C), who said that he understood but was disappointed the trip was postponed. The September 21 visit provides again an opportunity to deliver the requested ten-gram sample from the seized HEU in order to obtain cooperation from the GOR on this nuclear smuggling case and to eventually establish a more productive mechanism of U.S.-Russian cooperation on nuclear forensics.”

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

Reader 10/23/2017 (Mon) 16:26:01 Id: 23efda [Preview] No. 2634 del
In Conclusion

Mueller’s involvement in transporting highly enriched uranium to Russia as head of the FBI, as well as his current investments in Russia and co-investments with anti-Trump financier George Soros raise serious doubts over whether he can conduct an impartial investigation. Like Jim Comey, Mueller is quickly losing the confidence of the public.

The loss of confidence in Mueller’s investigation seems to extend to within his ranks. Peter Strzok, a veteran counterintelligence investigator, resigned from Mueller’s team in mid-August and transferred to the FBI’s human resources department. This move into human resources has been described as unprecedented by several former and current FBI counterintelligence agents, including Asha Rangappa, who said “I have seen instances where if some issue comes up, the agent might be moved to another investigation or to the operations center, where you essentially field calls all day, but why he would be moved to HR is just bizarre.”

Mueller’s many conflicts of interest creating a serious crisis of credibility in his expansive investigation. One question remains: how can Mueller investigate Russia while having so many vested interests in Russia?


Reader 10/24/2017 (Tue) 00:50:30 Id: 82a729 [Preview] No. 2648 del
Props to The Young Turks for covering this issue.

YES. It is real! https://archive.fo/wkE2z

Reader 10/24/2017 (Tue) 00:51:18 Id: 82a729 [Preview] No. 2649 del
Props to The Young Turks for covering this issue.

YES. It is real! https://archive.fo/wkE2z

Podesta’s 'Green Company' Forced to Close About One Year After Hillary Lost the Election Reader 10/24/2017 (Tue) 00:30:48 Id: 0c00d3 [Preview] No. 2647 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Joule Unlimited, a secretive green energy company that appears to have placed a big bet hiring Democratic insider John Podesta to its board, appears to have been doomed when former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 election.

When the 2016 presidential election ended, senior company executives admitted the prospects for their renewable energy “biofuels” company evaporated. “We had a lot of prospects last year,” former Joule CEO Brian Baynes told BioFuels Digest in a rare interview in July. “But those new investor prospects walked away, particularly post-election.”

Dmitry Akhanov, the president and CEO of Rusnano USA Inc., a Kremlin-owned venture capital firm nicknamed “Putin’s child,” oversaw the Russian government’s investment in Joule and sat on its board along with two other Russians with ties to the Kremlin. Akhavov agreed that Clinton’s loss doomed the company.

“We lined up investors who were willing to buy the bonds, but after the elections, with some statements from the new administration regarding potential uncertainty, the future support of biofuels was stopped,” he told The Daily Caller News Foundation in an interview. “The company was not able to do the deal and it was one of the reasons why the company was closed.”

Akhanov confirmed to TheDCNF his company invested and lost 1 billion rubles, worth $35 million when Joule closed its doors.

The two other board members with ties to Moscow were Ruben Vardanyan, who Putin appointed to a Russian economic modernization council, and Anatoly Chubais, a close personal friend of former President Bill Clinton and economic advisor to former Russian President Boris Yeltsin. Chubais allegedly made millions in the sell-off and “privatization” of Russia’s state-owned industries.

The FBI was concerned about Russian government investments in American high-technology firms, as previously reported by TheDCNF.

Lucia Ziobro, the special agent in charge at the FBI’s Boston field office, issued an “extraordinary warning” in 2014 about Russian investors to startups like Joule.

“The FBI believes the true motives of the Russian partners, who are often funded by their government, is to gain access to classified, sensitive and emerging technology from the companies,” she wrote in a Boston Globe op-ed.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

Class-action Lawsuits When!? IRS Ignoring Trump’s Executive Order to Stifle Enforcement of Obamacare Penalties Reader 10/23/2017 (Mon) 16:41:08 Id: 5f60f9 [Preview] No. 2635 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
The IRS is actively disobeying President Trump’s order to cease the enforcement of Obamacare penalties.

Contrary to widespread perceptions, the IRS still appears to be enforcing the unpopular Obama-era requirement that most people carry health insurance or risk a fine.

The agency says on its website that it will automatically reject electronic returns for tax year 2017 that don’t specify if the taxpayer had health insurance. That insurance requirement, known as the individual mandate, is the top target of so-far fruitless efforts by Republicans to repeal the Affordable Care Act.

Under the ACA, taxpayers are supposed to specify if they had coverage, or they were eligible for an exemption, or if they will pay the fine. But several million skip over that question and file “silent” returns.

This year the IRS continued to process such returns. However, taxpayers who skipped the health care question took a chance that they might later get a letter from the tax agency demanding answers.

Last week, the IRS released a new policy saying the health insurance question must be answered up front on tax returns. “Taxpayers remain obligated to follow the law and pay what they may owe at the point of filing,” the agency said on its website. With paper returns, processing may be suspended and refunds delayed.

The shift got little attention amid major “Obamacare” announcements from the White House. President Donald Trump ended a key health insurance subsidy. Tuesday a bipartisan deal was announced in the Senate that may yet preserve the subsidies, and Trump initially indicated he would support it. But later he appeared to backtrack.

The IRS has gone back and forth on how to treat silent returns.

As former President Barack Obama left office, the tax agency had planned to start rejecting such returns with the 2017 tax filing season — similar to what it will do next year.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

Reader 10/23/2017 (Mon) 16:42:41 Id: 5f60f9 [Preview] No. 2636 del
Trump has the authority to fire the officials who doesn't obey his Executive Orders and he should be doing so.

Reader 10/23/2017 (Mon) 18:35:30 Id: 2f3b5b [Preview] No. 2640 del
At this point it would end up being the entire IRS (and most of the rest of the three letter agencies for that matter).

Reader 10/23/2017 (Mon) 19:24:49 Id: 892c34 [Preview] No. 2641 del
Here's the main problem: while Obama was in office for 8 years he purged a lot of the old rank and file officials who might have gotten in the way of unconstitutional orders, this includes high ranking and mid-ranking officials in almost every governmental agency: including within the US military brass.

And you can guarantee right after the Nov. 2016 election that Obama also placed officials within the ranks to deliberatley sabatogue Trump's administration to the best of their ability (legal or not).

"The Deep State" as everyone calls is is full of Obama's holdovers. And many have been planning to disobey President Trump's orders. In order to mitigate this threat Trump would have to cause a PR shitstorm by firing and replacing Obama's holdovers en mass. This would be difficult because he would have to have names. He would have to target a very wide range of officials - not to mention finding legit replacements which would not be an easy task.

And believe me, even if he started a purge, the mainstream media would be screaming bloody murder and he'd have both sides of the political establishment trying to undermine him as well.

There is slim chance that Trump will achieve what he needs to achieve to save America. At this point it is up to the American people to prepare wisely in advance: IF they have the time and money to. The only thing we have on our side is our 2nd Amendment at this point, but using it to our advantage at the wrong time could spell disaster and could create a civil war, a civil war in which our military might not come to our aid when needed.

This is very scary times no doubt, so be prepared and make sure you have your lines firmly drawn in the sand. If the "deep state" gets too desperate they'll likely launch a nuclear EMP to knock out our own power grid and blame it on Russia, Iran or North Korea. And they'll sit back and wait till 90% of the American public dies off from starvation and/or lack of sanitation & resources. That way the traitors in power can better deal with hotpockets of resistance/militias/doomsday preppers at a later time when they become more vulnerable as we ration and drain our resources.

Remember: the government and the uber-rich elites are working hand in hand. Their goal is simple: they want us either enslaved & subjugated or dead in the future. Freedom is to be crushed by any means necessary no matter how evil or treasonous their actions.

Obama Holdovers Are Working To Bring About The End Of America, Trump Needs To Fire & Replace Them ASAP Reader 10/23/2017 (Mon) 18:12:32 Id: ca5cf6 [Preview] No. 2637 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Obama Holdovers Are Working To Bring About The End Of America, Trump Needs To Fire & Replace Them ASAP

RELATED: >>>/news/2499 (https://archive.fo/0SFIl)

Bureaucracies know how to deal with really challenging problems that affect the survival of our country: Kill the messenger.

The Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack terminated on September 30, ironically, the same month North Korea tested an H-bomb it described as “a multifunctional thermonuclear nuke with great destructive power which can be detonated even at high altitudes for superpowerful EMP attack.”

For 17 years, the EMP Commission warned about the existential EMP threat.

Rogue states or terrorists can blackout national electric grids and other life-sustaining critical infrastructures, topple electronic civilization, and kill millions from sea to shining sea, with a single high-altitude nuclear detonation, generating an EMP field covering North America. Natural EMP from a solar superstorm could blackout the whole world. EMP is considered a cyber weapon, not a nuclear weapon, in the military doctrines of Russia, China, North Korea and Iran.

On October 12, before a House Homeland Security Subcommittee chaired by Rep. Scott Perry, the EMP Commission staff delivered a final testimony, lamenting Washington bureaucrats are still oblivious to EMP. The Department of Defense (DOD), Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Department of Energy (DOE), still largely staffed by Obama-holdovers, did not ask Congress to continue the EMP Commission.

The Secretaries of DOD and DOE ignored repeated requests to meet with the EMP Commission. DOE thinks the EMP threat is unproven and plans to partner with the electric power industry on studying EMP until 2020 and beyond.

DOD is letting DOE waste millions of dollars on unnecessary studies while DOD sits on a mountain of classified studies proving the EMP threat is real — which is why DOD has spent billions EMP hardening military systems.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

Reader 10/23/2017 (Mon) 18:14:01 Id: ca5cf6 [Preview] No. 2638 del
We know for certain EMP will damage electronics and cause protracted blackout of unprotected electric grids and other critical infrastructures from:

• The 1962 U.S. STARFISH PRIME high-altitude nuclear test that generated an EMP field over the Hawaiian Islands, over 1,300 kilometers away, causing widespread damage to electronic systems.
• Six Russian high altitude nuclear tests 1961-1962 over Kazakhstan that with a single weapon destroyed electric grids over an area larger than Western Europe.
• 30 years (1962-1992) of U.S. underground nuclear testing. (Contrary to another government “expert” cited by Fox News, underground nuclear tests can tell a lot about the EMP threat from the weapon yield, gamma ray output, and other effects. Indeed, nuclear weapons specialized for EMP, what Russia and China call “Super-EMP” weapons, can be made without testing.)
• Over 50 years of testing using EMP simulators, including tests by the EMP Commission (2001-2008), proving modern semiconductor electronics are far more vulnerable to EMP than 1950-60s era electronics.

Moreover, hard data proving the threat from nuclear EMP is available from natural EMP generated by geomagnetic storms, accidental damage caused by electromagnetic transients, and non-nuclear EMP weapons. All these produce field strengths much less powerful than nuclear EMP.

Electromagnetic attack is well known to North Korea. It used a non-nuclear EMP weapon to attack airliners and impose an “electromagnetic blockade” on air traffic to Seoul, South Korea’s capital, disrupting communications and operation of automobiles in several South Korean cities in December 2010; March 2011; and April-May 2012.

Reader 10/23/2017 (Mon) 18:14:56 Id: ca5cf6 [Preview] No. 2639 del
Real world failures of electric grids from various causes indicate nuclear EMP attack would have catastrophic consequences. Big blackouts have been caused by small failures cascading into system-wide failures:

• The Great Northeast Blackout of 2003 — that put 50 million people in the dark for a day, contributed to at least 11 deaths and cost an estimated $6 billion — happened when a power line contacted a tree branch, damaging less than 0.0000001 (0.00001 percent) of the system.
• The New York City Blackout of 1977, that resulted in the arrest of 4,500 looters and injury of 550 police officers, was caused by a lightning strike on a substation that tripped two circuit breakers.
• The Great Northeast Blackout of 1965, that effected 30 million people, happened because a protective relay on a transmission line was improperly set.
• India’s nationwide blackout of July 30-31, 2012 — the largest blackout in history, effecting 670 million people, 9 percent of the world population — was caused by overload of a single high-voltage power line.

In contrast to the above blackouts caused by small-scale failures, nuclear EMP attack would inflict massive widespread damage to electric grids.

A protracted blackout endangering millions will be the inevitable result of the EMP attack described by the North Koreans.

But the EMP Commission won’t be around anymore to help prevent electronic Armageddon.


DNC Never Learned Their Lesson: Democrat Elitists Within DNC Are Purging All Dissenters and Bernie Bros Reader 10/22/2017 (Sun) 14:38:20 Id: 8e4eb9 [Preview] No. 2609 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
The Democratic Party is in meltdown mode, with Tom Perez, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, kicking out dissenters and anti-Clinton critics.

The mainstream media, with their commitment to seeing Democrats in power, are refusing to let the civil war within the party overshadow their fake Russian hacking narrative currently being pushed on the American people.

Americanthinker.com reports: So in order to see what the actual troops of the Dems think, we have to go to The Young Turks, a daily two-hour cable/internet show carried by Hulu, its own TYT network on Roku, and on a YouTube internet channel.

Yesterday, host Cenk Uygur unloaded on the DNC, comparing its purge to the Red Wedding massacre on Game of Thrones and sneering at NBC for not covering the imbroglio.


Rush transcript via Grabien:

UYGUR: “Now all of a sudden, it looked like it was a fun wedding until they took out the daggers and it turned into a red wedding, or in this case maybe a blue wedding. So let me tell you what happened next.

NBC News reporting, ‘A shake-up is underway at the Democratic National Committee as several key longtime officials have lost their posts, exposing a still-raw rift in the party and igniting anger among those in the progressive wing.’

Hmmm… Listen, they’ll going to get rid of a bunch of Ellison and Bernie supporters. I will tell you all about that, but the most important thing is why NBC News did not report that, but I will.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

Reader 10/23/2017 (Mon) 08:26:07 Id: e57135 [Preview] No. 2620 del
Are they seriously going to try having her run again in 2020? Even her own fan base admits she'll lose by a landslide.

Reader 10/23/2017 (Mon) 15:33:19 Id: 939006 [Preview] No. 2627 del
I used to consider myself a democrat long ago, actually voted for Dukakis (who lost to first Bush), then went independent and voted for Perot (who also lost), then voted dem again for Al Gore (another failure). After 9/11 happened it changed the way I viewed politics altogether and that's when I realized the whole system was corrupt to the core. It wasn't until 2016 that I voted again, and in 2016 I switched my vote from Bernie to Trump just because I knew Hillary was a scumbag neo-con in disguise just like GHWB.

The democrat party has changed a lot recently, it obviously has become corrupted. Likely always was to a certain degree but now they refuse to play fair. Its like the dems and republicans are in bed together and its so easy to see right through their propaganda and lies today. So I agree with the increasing polarized population, vote grassroots and throw out all the incumbents. Doesn't matter whether you are a democrat, republican or independent, the establishment needs to be rejected. They had enough time screwing us over. End their damn careers.

NYT BTFO By Jimmy Carter: 'Mainstream Media Is Lying, We Voted For Bernie Sanders Not Hillary, Obama Made Things Worse' Reader 10/23/2017 (Mon) 09:50:25 Id: c0515a [Preview] No. 2625 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
In a lengthy interview with The New York Times recently, 93-year-old former President Jimmy Carter cut loose on some painful establishment 'facts'.

As DailyWire.com's Joseph Curl reports, The Times decided to play up the fact that Carter would love to go over to North Korea as an envoy. But the Times is steadily proving how out of touch it is -- and how it no longer seems to actually "get" what real news is.

Here are some major highlights from the interview:

Carter was asked "Did the Russians purloin the election from Hillary?"

"I don’t think there’s any evidence that what the Russians did changed enough votes — or any votes," Carter said.

So the hard-left former president doesn't think the Russians stole the election? Take note, Capitol Hill Democrats.

Carter and his wife, Roselyn, disagreed on the Russia question. In the interview, she "looked over archly [and said] 'They obviously did'" purloin the election.

“Rosie and I have a difference of opinion on that,” Carter said.

Which prompted Carter to note that during the primary, they didn't vote for Hillary Clinton. "We voted for Sanders.”

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

Besides Populist Party Wins, The Pirate Party Also Won Big In Latest Czech Parliament Elections Reader 10/23/2017 (Mon) 09:17:05 Id: 4bfbda [Preview] No. 2624 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
RELATED: >>>/news/2584

The Czech Pirate Party has booked a significant win in local parliamentary elections. With more than ten percent of the total vote, the Pirates became the third largest party in the country, entering parliament with 22 seats. With its newly gained power, the party hopes to overhaul copyright legislation, fight corruption, and abolish Internet censorship, among other things.

The Czech Pirates have made quite a name for themselves in recent years.

The political party previously took on a local anti-piracy outfit by launching their own movie download sites, making the point that linking is not a crime.

The bold move resulted in a criminal investigation, but the case was eventually dropped after it was deemed that the Pirates acted in accordance with EU law.

In the political arena, the Czech Pirate Party booked several successes as well. In Parliamentary elections, however, the party never managed to beat the required threshold. Until this weekend.

With 10.79% of the total vote, the Pirates won 22 seats in the national parliament. Not just that, they also became the third largest political party in the country, where more than 30 parties participated in the elections.

The Czech Republic becomes the fourth country where a Pirate Party is represented in the national parliament, following Sweden, Germany, and Iceland, which is quite an achievement.

“It is the best result of any Pirate Party in history and gives us a great mandate to transform the dynamics of Czech politics. At the same time, we understand this as a huge responsibility towards the voters and the Pirate movement as a whole,” Tomáš Vymazal, one of the new Members of Parliament, tells TorrentFreak.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

(25.98 KB 300x241 Cold_War_Era_1.jpg)
(22.78 KB 190x279 Cold_War_Era_2.jpg)
ATOMIC ALERT! USAF Preparing to Put Nuclear Bombers Back on 24-Hour Alert Reader 10/23/2017 (Mon) 08:56:01 Id: 9cc2fb [Preview] No. 2623 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
The U.S. Air Force is preparing to put nuclear-armed bombers back on 24-hour ready alert, a status not seen since the Cold War ended in 1991.

That means the long-dormant concrete pads at the ends of this base’s 11,000-foot runway — dubbed the “Christmas tree” for their angular markings — could once again find several B-52s parked on them, laden with nuclear weapons and set to take off at a moment’s notice.

“This is yet one more step in ensuring that we’re prepared,” Gen. David Goldfein, Air Force chief of staff, said in an interview during his six-day tour of Barksdale and other U.S. Air Force bases that support the nuclear mission. “I look at it more as not planning for any specific event, but more for the reality of the global situation we find ourselves in and how we ensure we’re prepared going forward.”

Goldfein and other senior defense officials stressed that the alert order had not been given, but that preparations were under way in anticipation that it might come. That decision would be made by Gen. John Hyten, the commander of U.S. Strategic Command, or Gen. Lori Robinson, the head of U.S. Northern Command. STRATCOM is in charge of the military’s nuclear forces and NORTHCOM is in charge of defending North America.

Putting the B-52s back on alert is just one of many decisions facing the Air Force as the U.S. military responds to a changing geopolitical environment that includes North Korea’s rapidly advancing nuclear arsenal, President Trump’s confrontational approach to Pyongyang, and Russia’s increasingly potent and active armed forces.

Goldfein, who is the Air Force’s top officer and a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, is asking his force to think about new ways that nuclear weapons could be used for deterrence, or even combat.

“The world is a dangerous place and we’ve got folks that are talking openly about use of nuclear weapons,” he said. “It’s no longer a bipolar world where it’s just us and the Soviet Union. We’ve got other players out there who have nuclear capability. It’s never been more important to make sure that we get this mission right.”

During his trip across the country last week, Goldfein encouraged airmen to think beyond Cold War uses for ICBMs, bombers and nuclear cruise missiles.


Message too long. Click here to view full text.