>>13

Same as the one from the Asatru Folk Assembly website which is linked to from /r/reddit, and same as the one on crippledchan which was killed by race mixers coming in and saying that mongrels were allowed to be Asatru.

>>14

Oops.
"from /r/asatru." Same difference.

>>14
>>15

I guess you missed this paragraph:

>Is Asatru for people of non-European ancestry?
>No. Asatru is a specifically European faith. It is connected to the broader Proto-Indo-European culture, so it is possible to find cognate gods and related myths in other traditions descended from the PIE culture, but Asatru is not a universal faith. Just as a person of non-Native American ancestry should not expect to be accepted into a Native American faith, or a person of non-Indian ancestry should not expect to be accepted into a Hindu group, persons of non-European ancestry should not expect to be accepted by Asatru.

Not looking good for you that you didn't read it even after I pointed out with absolute certainty that you hadn't read it.

Actually, I can see from the banners that you are the same BO as the one on crippledchan, which means you are at best apathetic to the issue of race mixing.

That's all I needed to know. I'm not wasting my time giving activity to a board of subversive heretics encouraging white destruction.

I guess that puts to rest the question of whether you are a potential productive contributor or merely a trolling idiot.

>>17
>>16

Nice try it says that on crippled chan too, and even on /r/Asatru in a heavily butchered way.

https://www.reddit.com/r/asatru/wiki/faq#wiki_q.3A_i.27ve_been_told_that_race_and_ethnicity_is_important_in_.E1satr.FA.2C_is_this_true.3F

>>20

You will find that you are incorrect. It seems that you have a strong aversion to reading the written word, which I think makes you something of a liability here.

>>19

Yeah I know, being zealously against race mixing is not welcome on your universalist board.

>>22

How will you detect a "one drop"? What method and/or technology will you use? What is the procedure?

Historically, this guy falls totally silent when asked how he would detect a "one drop" race mixing. This is because he does not understand how to define or measure racial purity.

>>23

Confirmed for being the race mixer promoters pushing weasel hypothetical scenarios to get the foot in the door. Thanks I still had a shred of doubt but you repeating that question from the other thread clears it all up for me. You're not just apathetic to race mixing, you're pushing it.

>>25

The fact that you have no answer to this question means that your position is impractical. There is no purpose for a rule that cannot be enforced. What I would propose is this:

If you look White, act White, speak a European language, and fight for the preservation of the White race, then you are White.

You have so far offered absolutely no viable standard of your own or a technique for implementing it. This is because your position is motivated by divisive trolling rather than the preservation of racial purity.

>>26

You're such a shitty judge of character it's not funny. Enjoy the real trolls, moron. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming you're just stupid and not a troll which is probably naively generous of me after how utterly depraved you just revealed yourself to be.

I don't answer your question because it deserves no answer. The previous thread and this one asked only for a solid declaration against mutts and race mixing which you have repeatedly declined to provide. It didn't demand racial purity testing.

You have to understand that our problem is not with your insistence on absolute racial purity. The problem is that you are extremely stupid, and cannot understand that there is no method for detecting absolute racial purity. Genetic measurement will always have a margin of error. Geneological research can only look back so far. You are welcome in this movement, but you will have to understand your own cognitive limitations and let others who are smarter handle this question.

>>27

You got a brand new paragraph added to this FAQ and you are still unhappy. This is strong evidence that you are either a troll or are too stupid to engage in the question.

>>29

The one thing absent from your list of qualifiers to be an asatruar was that you not be mixed race. You didn't give me jack shit.

>>30

It explicitly excludes persons of non-European ancestry. This is stronger than a ban on race-mixing, because it excludes those who are the product of past race-mixing. You either did not read it or did not understand it. Again, you are demonstrating either that you are a troll or are too stupid to engage this question.

All you have to do is say "lol no mutts allowed" and you don't need any ridiculous purity testing hypothetical horse shit.

No one can then come in and say "hey guys, half black here, can I be an asatruar?" because he has already identified himself as impure for us.

>>32

I stated that in a literate manner. This is sufficient for anyone literate in English. If your native language is another European language, then please let me assist in translating the paragraph for you so that you can understand how English speakers will read it.

>>33

You didn't state that, though.

>Is Asatru for people of non-European ancestry?
>No. Asatru is a specifically European faith.
Simplifies to: You can't be fully of another race, you must have european ancestry. Mutts still allowed by the letter of this.

>It is connected to the broader Proto-Indo-European culture, so it is possible to find cognate gods and related myths in other traditions descended from the PIE culture, but Asatru is not a universal faith.
A continuation of the previous statement, encouraging full blooded nonwhites to look elsewhere. Nothing precluding hapas.

>Just as a person of non-Native American ancestry should not expect to be accepted into a Native American faith, or a person of non-Indian ancestry should not expect to be accepted into a Hindu group, persons of non-European ancestry should not expect to be accepted by Asatru.

And that's it. This is all shit you can find on the Asatru Folk Assembly website, it is not new, and it is no protection from the mongrel trolling which is the issue I have been attacking from the start.

>>34

As a matter of fact, no, I wrote that paragraph specifically for addition to the FAQ on this board. You are misreading the paragraph, which states unequivocally that Asatru is not for persons of non-European ancestry. It goes on to clarify that Asatru is for persons of European ancestry, and that persons with non-European ancestry should not expect to be accepted by it.

This is getting very close to "case closed" on the question of whether you are a troll.

The words "mutt" and "mongrel" come from animal breeding and are not of sufficient precision to capture your position as you have attempted to articulate it. To adopt it, the definition of "mutt" or "mongrel" must be written out in detail. I wrote them out in detail, and now you are deliberately misreading them in order to continue complaining.

I think you should look up the definitions of "mutt" and "mongrel". They refer to an animal with an overtly obvious mixture of breeds, for which no certain origin can be ascertained. This is a very weak standard which would permit someone of, say, 3/4 White ancestry merely because he is not obviously of mixed race. Instead of this I added a bright line standard: you must be of European ancestry and must not be of non-European ancestry. This is a much clearer and stronger statement. The fact that you reject it significantly indicts either your credibility or your intelligence.

>>35

Case closed it is. You think I care? I'm the only other pagan on this site who is showing any interest in you. At this point, I wouldn't even trust you to not change your stance later when the board became popular -- even if you DID make the open and shut statement I've been asking for.

Pretty sure you're also the one that promoted that ill-liberal hypothetical of race mixing with a half injun if she lied to you and said she was white and then outed herself as a mongrel after marriage.

Damned disappointing to have you as the board owner. I wish it occurred to me to make this board before you did.

>>37

This is a backup board in case the 8chan migration fails. I created it mainly to deny you that opportunity, because you have demonstrated insufficient intelligence or leadership to operate such a board. The traffic here should be low or nonexistent unless and until 8chan suffers a catastrophe. If 8chan survives then I will delete this board.

>>37
>Pretty sure you're also the one that promoted that ill-liberal hypothetical of race mixing with a half injun if she lied to you and said she was white and then outed herself as a mongrel after marriage.

I am not. And I am also not the board owner of 8chan's /asatru/.

If you want to advance a standard, you must be prepared to answer such edge cases. This is the responsibility of one who defines a standard. I have written technical standards for software, and phrasing them in such a way as to capture edge cases is an art, both conceptual and literate. You are not doing well on either count.

You continue only to repeat that you want an open-and-shut statement, but you use imprecise words and fail to provide example text. When shown text that implements your standard, you reject it and demand something less precise. This is a very unpersuasive and unviable position.

>>39

>Edge cases

Foot-in-the-door tactics only used by jews. They deserve no response and are not related in any way to the topic at hand of an open and shut statement that mutts aren't allowed.

Why don't you go ahead and answer one that I never saw asked on /asatru/ but saw in plenty of other WN circles.

>Hey guys I love the Old Gods but I have a Black Jewish wife, can me and my chocolate kids be Asatru?

>>40

Your total silence the imprecision of "mutt" and "mongrel" is the loudest thing in your rhetoric.

Please define "mutt" or "mongrel" if you wish to proceed.

I have to go to the shooting range now. Please do not hesitate to provide a definition for "mutt" or "mongrel" if you decide you would like to actually discuss this issue rather than sputter and flail.

>>42

tbh fam you should just shoot yourself. You've got jewish tactics down to your soul. Since you claim you're not the BO from 8chan that means you're one of the trolls who cleverly got in here and claimed the board. That was good thinking, and I will take it as a sign from the Gods that I should get off my ass and stop relying on useless message boards and grow the faith in the real world far away from kikes like you with an endless series of liberal challenges for 'clarity' on an infinity of imagined hypotheticals to get the foot in the door of an always visible agenda to undermine the faith.

>>43

Arguing with you is exactly like what Hitler describes in 'Mein Kampf' when he discusses arguing with Jews. You do not respond to anything anyone says, wriggling out of the fingers like slime, just repeating yourself over and over again. But what's sad is that the typical Jew does it better than you do.

Sad to see crippleBO is once again BO here to make this /mongreltru/. Good to know beforehand that this place is doomed. Thanks for the other anon to be right ontop of that case. I guess BO is a clappistani mongrel himself.

And since you are too lazy to just look up what mongrel means, here is the definition:
>mongrel (n.)
>late 15c., "mixed-breed dog," from obsolete mong'' "mixture," from Old English gemong "mingling" (base of among), from Proto-Germanic ''*mangjan "to knead together" (see mingle). With pejorative suffix -rel. Meaning "person not of pure race" is from 1540s. As an adjective from 1570s.

'Passing traps' aren't female. 'Passing whites' aren't white.

>>45

So, you would accept a person of pure Chinese ancestry? That would not be a mongrel.

>>47
What, a chinese traitor to consider himself a member of an exclusively white religion?

Answer:
No.

>>49

So, then, we should say that Asatru welcomes those with European ancestry and excludes those with non-European ancestry, yes?

Obligatory reminder that mongrels hate racemixers and racemixing. A firm stance against it would be appreciated.

Obligatory reminder that mongrels hate racemixers and racemixing. A firm stance against it would be appreciated.

Obligatory reminder that mongrels hate racemixers and racemixing. A firm stance against it would be appreciated.

Sorry if this ends up getting posted 3 times, but I can't see my previous posts and having read the rest of the thread the support for it looks worrying.

Racemixing is disgusting and those who participate in it will be punished by having their psyche destroyed with the guilt they have wasting their years where they could have had children like their ancestors but instead chose to have abominations that are psychologically broken and commit cruel crimes.

All racemixing should cease to be and the arab, black, white, gypsy, paki, and asian should never protcreate with one another. Never, not even once.

>>54

There's no support in this thread for racemixing.

The "looks White, acts White" standard is good enough until we win.

Jews are the most dangerous infiltrators. The best background check is lifetime friendship. If you know someone's extended family you can usually rule out any significant jew blood.

Once we're in charge we can develop standards for DNA testing setting a maximum allowable level of non-european ancestry.