>>58543
Blood related? Yes? Step-Sis? Uhh.. Maybe? (As long as you aren't the one pursuing her first.) Just stick to fucking your 3rd removed cousins or whatever the europeans were doing back inna day. It seems to be a Texas approved thing still.

>>58736
but what if she's really hot? is it still wrong?

>>58737
Yes, control your horny or you get bonkered to horny jail.

>>58738
It's very easy to say that when it's not a viable option. I wonder the things you would do if you didn't have such moral limitations.

Ain't nothing wrong with that. If i'd had a cute twin sister, i'd be banging her every day, but i'm an only child, so don't take my advice.
And who cares about morals anyway? Damn bud, 4cucks users are a bunch of moralfags plebbit-tier.

>>58543
Incest will always be an act of sexual immorality but it is nowhere near as harmful to society as it was centuries ago. Keep in mind populations were significantly lower then so inbreeding would definitely destroy nations rapidly. That is largely why it’s a taboo universally. The Mennonites of South America is prime example of that. If you watch documentaries about them you’ll notice that they’re largely inbred. This is less of a problem now since that populations are much larger and of course now that we have birth control.

Another reason is that it subverts the family unit. You won’t be able to have a healthy family relationship structure if you are banging your mom because by doing that you would be cucking your dad thus subverting his natural authority over you and his place as the man of the house which are both needed to raise healthy offspring. Nobody would respect a man who is being cucked by his son, taboo or not.

How can a mother discipline her son if he is fucking her brains out? At best he would see her as equals, at worse he would walk all over her because by fucking a woman you’re establishing yourself as dominant in the relationship you have with her. Some mothers are able to maintain healthy authority over their sons but many do not. Those that do make it clear to their sons that they are still their mothers first and foremost. The difference is that during the night, well you know. You could call it a free use system.

You’re less likely to look for a partner if you are fucking your mom or sister which is another reason why it’s harmful to society. After all, you’re already getting pussy at home so why would you bother?

My point is that the most pleasurable things in life can be the most destructive if you don’t use them with discipline. That is why they are designated as sinful to society because most do not know how to use them correctly. The same rule can be applied to various drugs (except for fentanyl and perhaps a few others) as they can have medicinal properties if used correctly with discipline.

Although it will always be in act of sexual immorality, in this day and age I find it rather tolerable. After all, it is better to have casual sex with your mother or sister than it is to sleep with people you just met on a dating app in which you could catch various stds. You already know and trust each other. If you are both grown adults and living alone together you might as well fuck as there’s no family unit to subvert at that point. It’s definitely healthier than the both of you masturbating alone. This is actually true if you think about it.

The only downside as I mentioned before is that you'll probably miss out on the opportunity of meeting the girl of your dreams because you’re preoccupied with keeping it in the family to care about outside pussy.

“He had a bad dream so she guided him inside the warmth of her cervix for comfort. Of course from there he had no choice but to penetrate as the need became rather overwhelming. After several intense and passionate penetrations the tingling sensation came and it was too much for him to bare. There was no question to it. He let out all his sperms deep inside her woman parts without a second thought, where he came out of long ago.

The way I see it, she was going her motherly duties. He had a nightmare for god sake!!!! What else was she supposed to do? It might not be a conventional motherly approach but most definitely a healthy one.”

idk but i want to fuck my sister so bad. she's so fucking hot

>>58543
it's not.
go anal and oral and if vaginal, be prepared for a dice roll about your kid.
it's not 100% of chance of problems btw. so even a kid is possible.

the kid yes. the kid should mix with other bloodline.

>>58836
>4cucks users are a bunch of moralfags plebbit-tier.
yes

>>58543
because she doesn't want to

>>58852
>The Mennonites in South America are a good example of this.
South American here, can't blame them, have you seen the disgusting mongrels that live here? And mennonites are of german ancestry, not even i, being white but of nothern spanish ancestry, want to have anything to do with mutts like pic related. So it's okay if they resort to incest.

>>58543
Recessive genes can express some messed up crap if she gets pregnant. It's generally bad news.

Ugly children

>>58836
There's a reason 4chan was mostly against LGBTQ+ type of shit. Its because we got morals.
>>58802
I'm more of a violent guy than a horny fuck everything that moves type of guy. Its good that I got moral limitations, otherwise... Yeah.

>>58968
I would only maybe not do two out of five of these, the middle and the right from the middle. The other three seem like a good fuck. Another man's trash another man's treasure. You are missing out, LATAM anon.

>>59091
Fair enough, everyone's got their tastes, i'm just not into them because of their obnoxious and "ghettoish" attitude.

>>59191
If you fuck Russian women for dating purposes, news flash, they are the biggest gold diggers and don't give a shit about anything. At least with LATAM hoes they don't expect to be given their own salary by their man on top of their regular income. (Most slavic women from eastern europe are like this, Baltics not as much.) Russian women are literal prostitutes. -_O_-

everything is wrong with fucking your sister

>>59191
From what i've seen they tend to be more laid back compared with argensimians, they make better wife material than the hoes from here, and i'm not into argensimian women anyway, so they're off the list. But as i said, tastes are subjective, varie from person to person. I've got a soft spot for pale women with cute facial features, and russian women tick all the boxes.

>>59355

> I've got a soft spot for pale women with cute facial features, and a russian women tick all the boxes.

This is likely off-topic to your reply, but when it comes to Russian girls and women in general, you would rarely find any of them cute because they're hardly public on the streets of certain towns or cities in Russia. It would be extremely hard to acquire a Russian chick because of the status of Russia right now. I'm pretty sure they're like a Shiny Pokémon right now in this world right now.

Do you also include girls and women in Eastern Europe, aside from Russia? Maybe including the Baltic states? Or maybe Polish, Ukrainian, or Belarusian?

>>58852

> Another reason is that it subverts the family unit. You won’t be able to have a healthy family relationship structure if you are banging your mom because by doing that you would be cucking your dad thus subverting his natural authority over you and his place as the man of the house which are both needed to raise healthy offspring. Nobody would respect a man who is being cucked by his son, taboo or not.

The idea of Incest is already bad on its own terms. It's better if the child (in this case, the son) should never have a sexual relationship with their parent (the mother) regardless of any reason to. Most parents treat their children morally. So the introduction of a sexual relationship is quite immoral, especially if they slap the fuck out of you and call you sick or something.

> After all, it is better to have casual sex with your mother or sister than it is to sleep with people you just met on a dating app in which you could catch various stds.

Fair point. If it's done correctly by using contraceptives (like condoms and stuff), then it's alright. Or if it's touching (masturbation, like you've already stated, nipple play, etc) that's fine. Just try not to impregnate your sister, mother or whoever, if it's a temporary sexual relationship (depends on your intentions).

>>58852
>inbreeding
you can cum on her face, btw

I rubbed my sister's cameltoe when she had passed out on sofa with tight camo pants. Then I think that same year I asked her if she wants to see my cock and she just told me to get a gf. Well next year I did. Thank god she didn't flip out and tell the whole family about my cringy shit

>>60932
Luck doesn't last for long, my friend. One day, she'll might tell without you knowing. And then it'll spread like a rumor with the family and her friends.

>>61076
Well there's zero chance and it's been 18 years

>>61112
Crazy.

>>58738
>>58802
Today it's easier for guys to control their sexual urges simply because pornography has proliferated and most guys have the luxury to fap to porn privately to relieve themselves but.... take away easy access to pornography or restrict it entirely, and leave men in areas with other women it becomes harder and harder to control your sexual urges and some men snap and become total animals desperate to relive their bloated balls into a woman. And yes, it can even happen with relatives too. I recall I had a crush a long time ago on a distant cousin and she would walk around showing off her hot legs in a short skirt barefoot. I often wondered what she'd do if I asked to fuck her but never had the courage lol.

why is it wrong to have sex with delicious little kids??

why not i mean get anti birth pills and yer ready to go :)

>>71157
Edit: "National Socialist". I hate jews, as they are naturall the greatest enemy of my race.

>>71157
>prepubescent human males should become the slaves of postpubescent human males
(!)
>all human males guilty of homosexuality should be exiled
(?)

Pick one faggot, can't have both.

>>71157
>taxes collected via percentages of land value (as in georgianism), and also a single sum taken from all individuals (as in flat taxation), and the numbers for each should be voted upon by the people.

Mmmmmmm.... and what if the people dared vote not to get robbed by government at all and voted to end taxation altogether?

>>71159
Goonerbrain, the purpose of having children graduate into personhood via the development of the capability to reproduce sexually isnt so pederasts could rape little boys and get away with it. Its because im drawing a clear distinction between the people (the select group described) and their property, also making this policy with a mind to eugenics and other matters. Also, we are sending any male who engages in homosexual behavior or who expresses attractions towards the same sex away to a place where they can govern themselves because then it would make the punishment seem like a reward, and faggots will come turning themselves in volunteering to go. Killing them or otherwise threatening them with what theyd percieve as harmful would just drive them undeeground where they will do the most harm.
>>71160
Then that would require the people to be retarded enough to think anarchy works, it doesnt, its not stable, best we can do is the minimal state via night watchman state minarchism and the principle of non-aggression. We need taxes to fund a centralized top down leviathan of government to enforce laws, laws only exist via their enforcement and we cant have multiple lawmgivers or we descend into warring states. What we can do to further safeguard against stupid citizenry is to grant voting rights only to those whove served a term in the military, yes, like in starship troopers, but starship troopers took that idea from many ancient societies like the medieval period and the roman republics. "Citizenship through service" is not a recent idea, and, its worked.

I just thought to make the most white supremacist, the most misogynistic, the most anti-communist, the most fascist society ever.

>>71161
>What we can do to further safeguard against stupid citizenry is to grant voting rights only to those whove served a term in the military, yes, like in starship troopers

Our based Founding Fathers not only opposed central banking, declared gold and silver as legal tender for currency, they also had privileges for voting too, only land owners could vote. Unfortunately for us today no one follows the US Constitution, nothing our Founding Fathers wrote is enforced anymore. It's too bad because if we followed the US Constitution today we would not have the problems we see today.

>>71161
One other big problem you have yet to address with your theory is runaway government. Runaway government is what we have today and it is just as dangerous as anarchy or any tyranny. Runaway government is when a government grows unsustainable, creates massive national debt to prop up endless bureaucracy and begins to bankrupt the entire nation by doing so, devaluing the currency, creating price inflation, wasting resources, starting unnecessary wars, abusing authority (corruption), destroying public trust, etc.

Perhaps government expenditure should be limited to how much they can actually tax people, and taxation would absolutely have limits and people would vote on those limitations every year to curb abuse, corruption and mismanagement.

>>71169
As we said, the government is only a minarchist nws, so it only does what we need it for: enforcing the laws of the nap, enforcing the interests of its people (straight white men) globally, and collecting taxes to finance these functions (stright white men whove done military service in times of war, or police work in times of peace, are eligible to vote for the taxes that fund these institutions, the point being tbat they must risk their lives by serving in a role where they must face the worst of reality and risk death and worse in order to earn such a priviledge).

There is complete separation of market and state, the government has no legislative power to make new laws or repeal laws that exist, and all laws are but one law, the principle of nonaggression, which states simply that if you are counted as a person, then any interactions with your body or belongings must be undertaken with your consent, or it is illegal (tbis principle handily covers murder, abduction, rape, theft, vandalism, tresspassing, fraud, contractual laws, etc.)

Theres a king wbo makes decsions not covered by the above, he is the head of the military.

There is no room for lobbying, no central banking, by maintaining a government that only makes sure laws are obeyed and that the nation isnt threatened by its neighbours, but is instead the one doing the threatening, and by keeping the master race(s) the sole residents of the nation, and by keeping the female sex in a role of property (being resources for sexual pleasure, reproduction, milk production, and domestic servitude, among any other uses a male owner may make of them), and by keeping pre-potent males as property in a similar fashion (ensuring individual fathers have full power to decide how their sons and daughters are to be raised), we are able to ensure a strong and enduring empire.

>>71170
Most of what you desire was granted and protected under US Constitutional Law but over the decades that has been eroded, abandoned, forgotten and ignored by corrupt government, politicians and institutions. Until Congress stops spending Trillions on bloated government, cuts back all the wasteful spending and solves the massive national debt insolvency crisis nothing will ever get fixed and the nation is doomed to become communist sadly.

By the way, if only land owners could vote we would not have communism today, city dwellers would hold virtually no voting power what-so-ever. Could you imagine the country if only rural America had the voting power? Chicago would not rule Illinois. Portland would not rule Oregon. That's what our Founding Fathers intended only allowing people with private property to vote. No one would willingly vote their farms away or vote to be taxed into oblivion or vote to give handouts to illegal aliens or anything else the communists in the cities always vote for.

>>71184
Sweet

>>58861
>>59065
As a eugenicist i am full in favor of all kinds of immorality and degeneracy due to the way it allows us to expose and weed out the genes that really should be dying out, thus improving the remaining stock.

Okay, the acts of incest cause recessive genes to express themselves more often, but recessive genes are not always inherited, so if you do a lot of parent-child and brother-sister incest, have a lot of inbred babies, and ruthlessly prune the defective offspring, the eventual result will be a family for whom inbreeding is no problem, since theres no longer any defective genes left to pass on in your dna.

>>71184
I could almost see her asshole molecules

This is my story so far ive always had a huge love for hamsters i mean theyre so lusty i cant help myself but.....


kid dosent think anarchy works

\ snicker




prob loves children

anyways i'm on the run again so i thought i'll tell you my story


i school there was a class hamster named Hammy. Hammmys pussy was so damn sexy. once my freind had the hamster so i wanted to meet it


when we arrived at Hammys cage my freind went to go get food for the Hamster so while my freind was away the lusts owerpowerd me i pulled the hamster from its cage ripped my pants down and absolutly banged it a few minutes later my freind pulls in sees my with my dick inside dead hamster ( from the cum generated from hamster pussy)




freind calls police and now i'm stuck on the run raping hamsters day in and day out so to help my hamster lusts ould yall posibly put some juicy ham picks in the reply section i'll help alot>>71161

>>71161
bruh thinks anarchy wouldnt work...

brain size

>>71299
Not him but anarchy does not work. Any vacuum of power inevitably creates another opportunity for others to usurp power. Anarchy always ends with tyranny over others. Humans will always fight over land and resources. There will always be self-determination to live better than other peers do. When there are no laws or law enforcement there will be people willing to steal from YOU. There will be people willing to kill YOU and take everything you once owned. The only way you stop them is to kill those people. That's the inherit flaw of anarchy, it does not end civilized, it ends in blood shed, it ends in new oppressors who take power by killing and pillaging others.

>>71303

let me ask you a question then are you more willing to kill someone that is armed or somebody who isnt armed



the reason anarchy works is that once the law enforcement is not there to protect them people arm themselves when you have an armed society they govern themselves if you see government controlled areas like the united kingdom where the government has banned all weapons that could be used in bloodshed but instead of making less homicide robbery etc there is so much homicide that people dont feel safe outside, children are gangbanged rich people flee the country etc etc but instead if you go to states in the us where everybody is armed there is almost no homicides why because people arm themselves because there is less police presence there now if everybody is afraid of everybody else because there is no stupid police fucking around people arm themselves also saying anarchy leads to tyranny over others is incorrect anyways when there is a govermental power people become weaklings and the government enslaves the people who dont have weapons if your idea is a government to protect the people look how good that ended up with ancient rome if you want a more powerful government that instead controls the people look no fut=rther than the soviets anyways if anarchy does not work then what does if nothing works then we should all commit suicide? And defending the government who would do that they rape children murder innocent people destroy houses drag us into debt now anarchy is definitly not utopia not even close but it is much better than the rest.

>>71317
One major flaw you did not point out is there are always power hungry control freaks, there are always those who will take up arms to seek power over others, or to rob other people. Just because you get rid of law enforcement does not mean those people won't still exist. They do and whether it's law enforcement engaging them or YOU engaging them, someone would have to because those assholes will exist despite whatever type of society we have. Luckily law enforcement is there to take care of the majority of these thieving punks. The rest of them you hear about rob apartments, homes and stores or end up dead in a self-defense related shooting. Even during the 'wild west' of American history this was still a problem.

>>60444
Mine preferred me making her a necklace. It was fine for us for the 4 years until she moved out. Are there any kind of stats on mothers that did incest how often they place their kids in vulnerable spaces with their lover?

>>71323
You fail at reading comprehension.

The point was that incest make defect more likely because it causes recessive genes to be more likely to get expressed as traits.

Recessive traits are more likely to code for deleterious phenotypes because they are less exposed to selective pressures due to not being expressed as often.

And, children born to high-cosanguinious inbreeding merely have a greater chance of manifesting a defective phenotype, because its not a certainty that they will inherit the recessive genes from both their parents.

Hence, in a society where brothers and sisters fuck a lot and make many children AND where eugenic purging is practiced, the defective offspring will be culled and the inbred children who lack defects will also be more likely to lack the recessive genes for those deleterious traits.

And over successive generations of brother-sister incest and the removal of inbreds who manifest any defective phenotypes, over time the bloodline will be strengthened to the point where the chances of producing a retarded child from a brother and sister smashing are as likely as having such a child from two wholly unrealted lovers making love and getting a pregnancy from it.

What the real issue is, is retarded babies being enabled to survive, we need eugenics, we require that all defective humans who fail to meet some selective standard not have resources wasted on them, and indeed that they be purged from continued life.

The problem of sister loving is not that it makes retards, but that we as a society keep our retards alive.

Also, we have an problem with women over 40 having retarded children, the biggest source of autists and downies are women giving birth in middle age.

I don't have a stepsister but I wish I did. We'd be fucking like crazy in secret for years then when parents have split, we'd get married and get into new social circles that don't know we were stepsiblings. Then I'd fuck her pregnant.

>>58543
Because people who ask such questions shouldn't breed.

>>71157
tl;dr

remingtoncorelokt22-250