>>103781
Tfw when you have to give up basic human rights for basically what is plants air but the jew doesnt have to

Its all so tiresome

>>103785
Not the first time they've done it.

https://www.truthdig.com/articles/meet-the-pistachio-barons-who-control-californias-water/

The Shameful Case of the Resnicks
https://youtube.com/watch?v=faTuVnXzb9I [Embed]

https://www.capradio.org/news/insight/2018/02/06/insight-020618a/

Who Are the Resnicks, the Art Collectors Accused of Hoarding California’s Water?
https://news.artnet.com/art-world/resnicks-los-angeles-2597907

>>103804
I have always considered the pistachio to be a harmless little snack. That was, until I watched Yasha Levine and Rowan Wernham’s “Pistachio Wars,” which shells open a world of greed and corruption that is hanging the state of California out to dry.

At the center of the story is the billionaire-couple Stewart and Lynda Resnick. He is the country’s wealthiest “farmer”; she is the daughter of the producer of the cult favorite “The Blob” and a marketing whiz who could sell coal to Newcastle. Together, they have built up The Wonderful Company into a billion-dollar enterprise and gained control over much of California’s water, a subject that has drawn fresh interest in the wake of this year’s deadly LA fires, during which city fire hydrants ran dry.

>>103805
More stuff from the articles

>Despite their philanthropic gifts, the Resnicks have frequently come under fire for their farming practices and profits since a 2016 investigation by Mother Jones revealed that the Wonderful Company uses more water than any other in California. In 1994, the couple secured a favorable deal, acquiring a 57 percent stake in Kern, which was then a failing public water bank on the verge of shuttering, in exchange for state water deliveries. Today, the bank grants the Resnicks near-unmatched access to water, enabling them to irrigate 130,000 acres of farmland in the state. Since the article was published, some critics and advocacy groups have alleged that the negotiations that took place with state officials and water district leaders were “secretive.”

As the effects of climate change have become more visible in recent years, and droughts in Southern California more common, there have been public protests against the Resnicks’ philanthropy at both LACMA and the Hammer. Following historic destruction over the last week from several wind-fueled wildfires in L.A., which have depleted fire hydrants, critics have renewed efforts to highlight the Wonderful Company’s water storage and usage.

“The Resnicks are powerful and their control of so much water is ridiculous,” filmmaker Yasha Levine, co-director of the forthcoming documentary Pistachio Wars, told the Daily Mail over the weekend.

On January 14, the anonymous collective A New Art World and Collecteurs, an online art platform that bills itself as the world’s first “collective digital museum,” shared a post on Instagram citing the Resnicks’ art-world connections and claiming they own “almost all the water in California.” The post also incudes references to the couple’s support of Israel, for which they have come under scrutiny before, especially amid the ongoing war in Gaza.

yeah it's pretty bad.

>>103782
>Make company more "diverse"
>force everything inside the company to be "diverse". Products, ads, etc
>Alienate audience that likes company. They don't like it.

>Company loses stocks and customers. Value gets deflated

>blackrock buys the company out for literally nothing
>rinse and repeat

I think that's the strategy they're trying to do. It's called a "corporate raid". It was more frequent in the 80s and 90s I think

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_raid

It's a lot of stuff. Maybe Tardus can look into all of these links and give his opinion since he used to work in Finance/Wall Street and knows more about this than I do.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leveraged_buyout

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquidation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hostile_takeover

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mergers_and_acquisitions

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_private_equity_and_venture_capital

>>103807
Sort of it works like this however also it works on basis of financial speculation maybe brought from postcom nations (because i remember it was most rampant there when sojuz fell)
Long story short you borrow money to buy enterprise that has issues force rhat enterprise to bankrupt itself trough constant loans etc to pay your loan and then sell that thing for price you say or liquidate thereby repeating whole proccess

>>103809
>Long story short you borrow money to buy enterprise that has issues force rhat enterprise to bankrupt itself trough constant loans etc to pay your loan and then sell that thing for price you say or liquidate thereby repeating whole proccess

lol that sounds so neurotic and scummy. I doubt that works every time though.

>>104008
>I doubt that works every time though.
sadly it works for blackrock and friends practicing such matters almost always before liquidation or consolidation as the point is to cash out asap with your investment even if its the liquidation of assets

>>104026
What I heard is that (((those people))) used to do these types of tricks to their own people for centuries before they started doing them on actual human beings. We're just seeing the how they actually are. Most of us just aren't used to this level of dirtbagness.

But, at least we can keep what they do in mind for the future. We won't get fooled again.

Do you think these schemes they do will go on forever? No, I don't think so. Nothing ever last forever anons. Neither good things nor bad ones.

Hopefully the next civilization/culture/people that take over after them don't do the same tricks they're pulling.