/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Political discussion of ideology, history, and [current] events.

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Catalog | Bottom


Please use the stickies + catalog
DO NOT CONTINUE UNTIL YOU HAVE READ META THREAD 6
Logs can be found here: https://endchan.net/logs.js
Insulting National Socialism or Hitler or promoting jews will be banned immediately.

Expand All Images


(94.67 KB 1024x846 2neeb6.jpg)
Understanding National Socialism Arminius 07/28/2021 (Wed) 17:38:38 Id: 505c74 [Preview] No. 85077
Hey so I got a few questions just to clear up a couple things that some people say about national socialism as well as my general thoughts on things in general.

So I guess I start from the beginning the way I view a nation as it should be is as a garden where the government acts to grow a strong and powerful people. In that garden anything can grow which represents the myriad of talents with the strongest being allowed to propagate themselves and the weaker allowed to attempt but inevitably fail. In the propagation of the strongest both the people and nation benefit however there must be a recognition of the weak and the strong and that there are different weaknesses and strengths. I have talked to some people who say that if they were to ever get power they would institute universal basic income which I think just incentivizes laziness.

I guess what I'm trying to clear up do the people here believe in a hierarchy or do they believe everyone is equal?


Anonymous 07/28/2021 (Wed) 22:23:34 Id: 66662f [Preview] No.85079 del
I believe it's best to answer with quotes from Hitler.
"The National Socialist trade-union is not an instrument for class warfare, but a representative organ of the various professions and callings. The National Socialist State recognizes no ‘classes’ but, from the political point of view, only citizens with absolutely equal rights and equal obligations corresponding thereto. Apart from these, it recognizes subjects of the State who have no political rights whatsoever. According to the National Socialist concept, it is not the task of the trade-union to band together certain men within the national community and thus gradually to transform these men into a class, so as to use them in a conflict against other similarly organised groups within the national community. We certainly cannot assign this task to the trade-union as such. This was the task assigned to it the moment it became a fighting weapon in the hands of the Marxist. The trade-union is not naturally an instrument of class warfare; but the Marxists transformed it into an instrument for use in their own class struggle. They created the economic weapon which the international jew uses for the purpose of destroying the economic foundations of free and independent national States, of ruining their national trade and industry and thereby enslaving free nations to serve Jewish world finance, which transcends all state boundaries." - Mein Kampf page 676

"For the National Socialist trade-union, therefore, the strike is a means that may, and indeed must be, resorted to as long as there is not yet a National Socialist völkisch State, but when that State is established it will, as a matter of course, abolish the class struggle between the two great groups made up of employers and employees respectively. For that is a struggle which has always resulted in lessening national production and injuring the national community. In place of this struggle, the National Socialist State will undertake the task of caring for and defending the rights of all parties concerned. It will be the duty of the economic chambers to keep the national economic system in smooth working order and to remove whatever defects or
errors may affect it adversely. Questions which are to-day settled only by the struggle of millions of people will then be settled in the representative chambers of trades and professions and in the central economic parliament. Thus employers and employees will no longer find themselves drawn into a mutual conflict over wages and hours of work, always to the detriment of the interests of both. They will solve these problems together before a higher authority, whose sole aim will be to safeguard the welfare of the national community and of the State. Here, as everywhere else, the inflexible principle must hold good that the interests of the country must come before party interests." - pages 677 and 678


Anonymous 07/28/2021 (Wed) 22:52:10 Id: 505c74 [Preview] No.85080 del
>>85079

Sounds nice, but I meant more in the personal and societal aspect those who have ambition and talent go on to become higher men trying to embody ever higher ideals. Noblesse oblige if you like.


Anonymous 07/29/2021 (Thu) 01:48:20 Id: 66662f [Preview] No.85082 del
(48.46 KB 960x535 23156.jpg)
(653.83 KB 1500x1004 134a.jpg)
(333.50 KB 1500x1005 57425.jpg)
>>85080
There were no higher ideals than being a citizen of the Third Reich, then and now. On the societal aspect, there were the boys and girls of the Hitler Youth. In the SS, enlisted had different squad ranks while officers had different lead ranks. There wasn't a hierarchy of citizens besides mentioned in the quotes with employers / employees. To become greater and achieve higher was meant for all true German citizens and not jewish parasites. The latter whom both disparaged and degenerated culture before and after the Third Reich.


Anonymous 07/29/2021 (Thu) 17:45:17 Id: 8ff4ae [Preview] No.85083 del
>>85082

freedom is duty, I guess what I am trying to say that there are always lesser and greater men, I assume you're talking about equality in terms of the law.


Anonymous 07/29/2021 (Thu) 20:46:48 Id: 66662f [Preview] No.85084 del
>>85083
In terms of their law, not modern law. The modern concept has been made perverse. All of the current crying about has done nothing to eliminate extreme class differences, because "equal rights" now means less rights for the other person. Those jews deem as "oppressors" and the brainwashed sheep who mentally absorb their drivel. Men and peach color skin are the primary targets of the jewish agenda to break up or discourage the family unit of these types.



Top | Return | Catalog | Post a reply