/b/ - Random

Anything posted here are autistic works of fiction, only a fool would take them seriously.

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)
Captcha-exempt posters may leave this blank.
No cookies?

Board Rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Staff: Moderate thread

Return | Magrathea | Catalog | Bottom

Expand All Images


(74.48 KB 541x1024 0227gf4tt.jpg)
Anonymous 07/10/2026 (Fri) 13:36 [Preview] No. 78897
What do you anons think about this thorny topic?

On one hand, yes these public cameras do violate privacy as once upon a time was protected by the 4th Amendment of the US Constitution.

On the other hand, yes Democrat soft-on-crime policies in major cities have lead to disastrous violent crime rates, including armed robberies and "smash and grabs". Because of this, now many Republicans support a police state whereas decades ago almost no one did.

My controversial take: the cities that cannot control their crime rates should absolutely have FLOCK cameras installed (at least temporarily until crime rates fall and more criminals get locked up). The areas where there is little to no crime rates should not and be able to enjoy a little more freedom because they already know how to run their communities properly.


Anonymous 07/16/2026 (Thu) 10:26 [Preview] No.79101 del
I hate the surveillance state but I hate out of control anarchy too. The ideal civilization was to have neither, something we once took for granted.



Top | Catalog | Post a reply | Magrathea | Return | Staff: Moderate thread




Board owners/volunteers: use the authenticated staff thread view for bans, IP/range info, thread settings, transfer, and spoil tools. This public thread page is shared with all visitors and caches, so the controls below are only delete/report.

Report captcha