/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

shitpost your way to the left

Boards | Magrathea | Catalog | Bottom

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096


cialis cialis 11/24/2016 (Thu) 07:59:51 Id: be00e2 [Preview] No. 339 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Haven't you thought the new design for the http://c9superactive.com/ , potente ?



(70.56 KB 579x647 1455090825431.jpg)
/leftypol/etariot 02/13/2016 (Sat) 19:35:40 Id: ed1655 [Preview] No. 236 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
>being a leftist
>being a communist
4 posts and 1 image omitted.


/leftypol/etariot 10/06/2016 (Thu) 00:44:44 Id: e879e9 [Preview] No.329 del
a


/leftypol/etariot 10/06/2016 (Thu) 00:44:58 Id: e879e9 [Preview] No.330 del
lean


/leftypol/etariot 10/06/2016 (Thu) 00:45:31 Id: e879e9 [Preview] No.331 del
wuh


/leftypol/etariot 10/06/2016 (Thu) 00:45:57 Id: e879e9 [Preview] No. 332 del
1488


/leftypol/etariot 10/09/2016 (Sun) 02:35:32 [Preview] No. 333 del
From natsoc perspective, it's better than being right wing savage.



(9.65 KB 248x250 1436851798493.jpg)
So considering this board isn't run by the old admin... /leftypol/etariot 01/04/2016 (Mon) 14:13:56 Id: 3a56d2 [Preview] No. 8 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
I can take it that there won't be any gay word filters or censorship of unpopular opinions like there was on the old /leftypol/?
11 posts and 5 images omitted.


Sentennial Board owner 02/15/2016 (Mon) 07:53:09 Id: d1c367 [Preview] No. 273 del
>>254
But the point of this board is debate and introspection of leftism, word filters would just be a form of censorship here. It might be funny on a clearly ironic/shitposting board, but here it's important to understand what they're saying. That's not to say everything here is serious business, but their words should be taken at their own value.
>No one but them would have a problem with it
I hope you don't actually mean that. Come on.


/leftypol/etariot 05/03/2016 (Tue) 11:39:14 [Preview] No. 281 del
>>12

Chomsky follows Marx in opposing the private ownership of the means of production, which he believes permits "elite groups" to :"command resources, based ultimately on their control of the private economy," and ends up excluding the public from "basic decisions concerning production and work."3

Let's stop right there. What he means is hard capital: machines, buildings and so on. One would think that if private persons and business concerns cannot own these things, the state will do so. We call that state socialism. Chomsky apparently is against that too.

So, if the state isn't going to own income-producing property, and private concerns are not going to own it, who is going to own it? Apparently, and this all very fuzzy, the means of production will somehow be collectively owned by the workers themselves, wherein we arrive at the silly concept of anarcho-syndicalism. Instead of greedy capitalists owning the corporation, the workers themselves will own it. But it will not be ownership in the form of individual shares that can be sold. That's capitalism.

No, he favors a vague and ill-defined form of collective ownership that the workers will figure out as they bumble and stumble along towards bankruptcy. As Mises writes in Socialism, "as an aim, Syndicalism is so absurd, that speaking generally, it has not found any advocates who dared to write openly and clearly in its favor."

Details aside, imagine how this syndicalism idea would have worked out recently in America. Let's say the workers had the privilege of owning Enron. Giddy syndicalists seem to view ownership of business concerns as always and everywhere a good thing.

But ownership also implies risk and liability, liability for debts and lawsuits. After Enron collapsed into a pile of incomprehensible derivatives, how many workers there wished they co-owned Enron? Under current law, employers are responsible for the torts and contract breaches of employees. How many workers would want to bear that risk?

https://mises.org/library/chomskys-economics


/leftypol/etariot 05/03/2016 (Tue) 12:09:57 [Preview] No. 282 del
>>12

Furthermore, an anarcho-syndicalist legal order, stateless or not, would obliterate the intertemporal division of labor and reduce mankind to squalor.

Improved productivity depends on capital goods, which in turn depend on delayed consumption.[5] People who choose to delay consumption extensively can come to own a stock of capital goods beyond what they can physically use themselves. If such people cannot hire labor to work with those goods without thereby losing title, they will consume their capital and stop saving.

A left-libertarian I recently debated responded to this point by asking how a factory could be "consumed." I explained to him that except for particular cases, such as seed corn, capital consumption is not generally the literal eating of capital goods. Capital consumption is the failure to direct enough materials away from consumption in order to maintain the capital goods. A factory is consumed when it is allowed to fall into complete disrepair, converted to less-productive processes (like a simple process that could be handled by the owner alone), or broken down and sold in parts or for scrap.

Another left-libertarian then chimed in, saying that the workers in such a factory could then simply take over the factory, rather than let it go to waste.

I pointed out that, yes, workers could take control of the factory. But the classical-liberal legal order doesn't prevent cooperatives, so if they were so good at running their own factory enterprise, why could not those same workers form a cooperative and pool their wages or borrow money to create or buy their own factory in the first place? If it is because the "absentee-owned" factory was run more competently in light of ultimate consumer evaluation, and thus they would not have been able to compete, then this new turn of affairs will only be to the detriment of the general public.

The entrepreneurial judgment and capitalist providence of any and all would-be employers whose qualities happen not to be best suited for worker-owned enterprises would be underutilized. And the judgment and providence of any and all would-be employers whose qualities happen not to be at all suited for worker-owned enterprises would be completely unutilized. Because nature spreads her gifts un-uniformly, virtually all would-be employers would fit one of those two categories.

Collaborative production (the division of labor) is so bountiful because it allows people to specialize: to focus on what they are good at and then exchange with each other. Perhaps in a handful of occasions, the people who are best at supporting and directing an enterprise are the same people who are best at operating the equipment. But because of human and natural diversity, that will virtually never be the case. By confining human interaction such that the direction and support of an enterprise can only ever be done by those operating the equipment, anarcho-syndicalists would be precluding innumerable mutually advantageous exchanges between savers and workers.

A capitalist/worker arrangement is effectively an intertemporal exchange. Workers are advanced present money in exchange for enabling the capitalist to own and sell a future product. Abolishing wages would therefore be injurious to both would-be consenting parties.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.



/leftypol/etariot 05/17/2016 (Tue) 23:43:09 Id: 6c5813 [Preview] No. 296 del
>>282
>>281
These arguments only somewhat hold for present day productive technology. Near future technology can suddenly make it practical for a majority of people to live in small independent communities. Modern economy-of-scale-based capitalism on steroids may collapse then.


/leftypol/etariot 09/14/2016 (Wed) 20:24:56 Id: ab31a3 [Preview] No. 324 del
>>296


As capital itself becomes increasingly self-sufficient, self-organizing, and autonomous, feeble ape creatures will become a liability to be dispensed with.



(79.03 KB 679x693 1403660095334.gif)
Why do you like jews?


/leftypol/etariot 05/16/2016 (Mon) 05:03:16 Id: 05b2d4 [Preview] No. 295 del
(66.70 KB 1102x1100 Where's the fish.png)


/leftypol/etariot 09/03/2016 (Sat) 01:58:04 [Preview] No. 320 del
FUCK YOU BIGOT

I don't like Jews. I just like letting a semi-passable trap fuck me in the ass sometimes and the rightTARDS say that's gay, so FUCK THEM.


/leftypol/etariot 09/06/2016 (Tue) 02:13:31 [Preview] No. 321 del
It's lefties who voice opposition to israel. right not only support israel but wants to replicate their politics (build a wall etc.)


/leftypol/etariot 11/26/2016 (Sat) 03:50:06 Id: dc22f6 [Preview] No. 343 del
>>294
why do you like cocks?



(11.24 KB 1500x900 Black_&_Red_Flag.png)
8ch down, 4ch cancer /leftypol/etariot 05/21/2016 (Sat) 08:28:17 Id: 6ecc6a [Preview] No. 297 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
>8ch down
>4ch is cancer
>/pol/ has WAY too many cappie scum
>hello all anarchists on /leftypol/
7 posts and 1 image omitted.


/leftypol/etariot 07/27/2016 (Wed) 21:53:30 Id: 869747 [Preview] No. 309 del
(9.73 MB 3368x1920 2DParadise.png)
The only way to make anarchism 'work' is Separatism, comrades, I hereby propose the World Union of Separatists!


/leftypol/etariot 07/28/2016 (Thu) 00:49:19 Id: 2b9e8d [Preview] No. 310 del
>>309
If it is mutual seperation. No one has the authority to segregate a mass of people.


/leftypol/etariot 07/28/2016 (Thu) 05:59:04 Id: 0ac9e3 [Preview] No. 311 del
... typically majority vote by the eligible public (those living within the boarders of the proposed new state) is necessary.


/leftypol/etariot 08/02/2016 (Tue) 01:45:55 Id: a217e7 [Preview] No. 313 del
(243.45 KB 388x587 1464228049820-1.png)
>>311
>Anarchy
>State
I think you meant territory


/leftypol/etariot 09/03/2016 (Sat) 01:54:59 [Preview] No. 319 del
Hi fellow radicals. This question doesn't really deserve its own thread so I guess I'll ask it here. Can I love twink shit on my face but still be a liberal?



Bottled water /leftypol/etariot 01/27/2016 (Wed) 22:11:44 Id: 564ed1 [Preview] No. 177 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Have you ever seen a sadder example of consumer and corporate culture? Something as simple as water is now a bottled and branded product. Why? WHY? It's fucking water. I can get the same shit from my kitchen sink, and it costs less than one cent per gallon. Bottled water costs around ~$2 and you don't get nearly that amount. And it's the same fucking water. Waters don't have flavor, they're not supposed to. Water isn't supposed to be fresher or better or healthier (not to be confused with cleaner, which it should be by default) just because it was collected at the base of ancient Himalayan mountains from melted snow, or rather, the way it's purported that way. In truth all the bottled water is tap water with a label. People actually fall for this.

This is even worse than people who buy shiny rocks like diamonds and spend thousands because they're "rare" and "muh class status."

Bottled water is a waste of money. Fuck capitalism.
1 post omitted.


/leftypol/etariot 05/03/2016 (Tue) 13:53:56 [Preview] No. 283 del
>I can get the same shit from my kitchen sink

No you can't. Filtration equipment costs money. Government water is not filtered as much as bottled water.

But please continue to drink your government dirt water.


/leftypol/etariot 05/03/2016 (Tue) 14:46:25 [Preview] No. 284 del
>>283
My country has higher quality standards for tap water than for bottled water.


/leftypol/etariot 05/15/2016 (Sun) 00:32:32 [Preview] No. 291 del
>>284
Then your government is wasting your money filtering water that you generally are not drinking.


/leftypol/etariot 05/15/2016 (Sun) 01:25:28 [Preview] No. 292 del
>>291
That state being made on the assumption that the bottled water is less filtered than government water.

However it is likely that bottled water is generally filtered more regardless of baseline regulations.


/leftypol/etariot 05/15/2016 (Sun) 01:26:10 [Preview] No. 293 del
>>292
statement* not state



/leftypol/etariot 04/22/2016 (Fri) 04:48:02 Id: 6ad601 [Preview] No. 280 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
hey guys 8chan here
since the site is confirmed fucked
http://endchan.xyz/ggrevolt/res/539.html
do you think there should be a mass migration here?


/leftypol/etariot 05/04/2016 (Wed) 08:33:43 [Preview] No. 285 del
bearded kike stallman again here?



(63.49 KB 600x585 barker gtfo.jpg)
/leftypol/etariot 01/26/2016 (Tue) 00:14:44 Id: c41984 [Preview] No. 173 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
You all have the rest of the internet to spout your bullshit views without any sort of punishment, why come here?


/leftypol/etariot 01/27/2016 (Wed) 06:32:14 Id: 81a9b4 [Preview] No. 175 del
>>173
I am sorry for personally dragging you here and making you post on this board and look at its contents. I would also like to take the time to apologize for being objectively wrong by your opinion, for killing your family, for burning your house down, for stealing your girlfriend, for shitting in your toilet tank, for farting in your face while you slept last night, for raping your dog, for giving AIDS to your cat, for forcing you to join ISIS, for disconnecting in your online games, and for being LITERALLY Stalin.


/leftypol/etariot 01/27/2016 (Wed) 11:08:25 Id: ce0ce8 [Preview] No. 176 del
>>175
Psychic or raving mad? You be the judge!



(79.07 KB 500x288 1381782276983.jpg)
(86.70 KB 600x382 1evilbirdowl.jpg)
(68.81 KB 800x450 684135211.jpg)
/leftypol/etariot 01/16/2016 (Sat) 07:06:01 Id: e0f5d8 [Preview] No. 152 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
I have you faggots don't mind if I test this on your dead faggoty board.


/leftypol/etariot 01/23/2016 (Sat) 21:58:59 Id: 9122ab [Preview] No. 170 del
>>152
You know there's a >>>/test/ board, right? It was on the front page.


/leftypol/etariot 01/25/2016 (Mon) 23:42:59 Id: bb4d94 [Preview] No. 172 del
>>170
you obviously mean
>>>/leftypol/
designated test board



(803.00 KB 2048x1409 1444169576289.png)
(47.64 KB 500x514 1444332481854-0.png)
(67.56 KB 500x514 1444332481862-1.png)
(114.47 KB 500x514 1444332481866-2.png)
Porky Thread /leftypol/etariot 01/23/2016 (Sat) 20:45:15 Id: 3eb064 [Preview] No. 154 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Post rare porkies.
9 posts and 36 images omitted.


/leftypol/etariot 01/23/2016 (Sat) 20:53:29 Id: 3eb064 [Preview] No. 164 del
(287.89 KB 720x480 1452717677164-4.png)
(75.52 KB 645x512 1452718169507-0.png)
(195.95 KB 600x439 1452718169508-2.png)
(520.31 KB 1142x607 1452718169636-4.png)


/leftypol/etariot 01/23/2016 (Sat) 20:54:25 Id: 3eb064 [Preview] No. 165 del
(156.26 KB 600x688 1452718480744-0.jpg)
(55.68 KB 720x405 1452718480745-1.jpg)
(79.30 KB 480x639 1452718480745-3.jpg)
(5.09 KB 315x119 1452718480745-4.jpg)


/leftypol/etariot 01/23/2016 (Sat) 20:54:45 Id: 3eb064 [Preview] No. 166 del
(32.28 KB 530x570 1452718716231-1.jpg)
(174.58 KB 500x492 1452718716232-4.png)
(258.02 KB 891x849 1452719028815-0.jpg)
(140.31 KB 730x514 1452719028858-2.jpg)


/leftypol/etariot 01/23/2016 (Sat) 20:55:15 Id: 3eb064 [Preview] No. 167 del
(106.47 KB 1120x1095 1452721398208-4.png)
(256.60 KB 576x566 1452729725302-0.png)
(107.11 KB 500x500 1452731402869.jpg)
(256.48 KB 700x468 1452731660980.png)


/leftypol/etariot 01/23/2016 (Sat) 20:55:49 Id: 3eb064 [Preview] No. 168 del