/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Political discussion of ideology, history, and [current] events.

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Catalog | Bottom


Please use the stickies + catalog
DO NOT CONTINUE UNTIL YOU HAVE READ META THREAD 6
Logs can be found here: https://endchan.net/logs.js
Insulting National Socialism or Hitler or promoting jews will be banned immediately.

Expand All Images


Defending Hitler and National Socialism General Anonymous 11/27/2019 (Wed) 15:20:00 Id: 88987e [Preview] No. 77267
ITT: We defend Hitler from claims such as that he was a jew working to establish Israel/etc.
From a "French" jewish anti-Hitler website:
<The shady things about Hitler sustaining the idea he was a zionist jew
Authored by "hexzane527".
>1) First of all, in a country dominated by jews as was Germany during the 20's and the 30's, it would have been impossible for a hostile goy like Hitler to come to power. When they control a country, jewish leaders don't let hostile goyims take back the power. So, the rise of Hitler is unbelievable, especially in such a short period of time.
hexzane527 seems to have no idea how revolutions work at that. 10 years isn't a "short period of time" first of all.
Hitler's takeover wasn't democratic or such at all. It was purely a result of the peoples' will. Von Hindenburg appointed Hitler the chancellor, and through that Hitler took over in 1933. He wasn't elected.
>2) The reaction of Hitler about Dunkirk is also incredible. He can capture the entire English army. But what does he do ? He let them flee. What !!? And the Hitler's pretext is that he had a great respect for England ! Wtf !!? No, only a traitor acts like that. A real nazi would never have done that.
>He did that because he was a zionist jew. And as the war was a fake one, he had to let the english army flee. Otherwise, England couldn't have continued the war. And the USA couldn't have made the D-day and won the war with the USSR as it was planned.
How childish. If you look at the two options here:
<Hitler respected England and the English people to the extent that he actually said he wasn't willing to shed their blood for war.
<Hitler was a Zionist jewish puppet which is why he let them escape!!
Which one is more reasonable and realistic?
Second, Dunkirk wouldn't have affected the war with England at all. It boils down to Lord Halifax or Churchill becoming prime minister. Halifax could've accepted the position of PM, and he was for peace with Germany. The mason Churchill being one of the worst warmongers of the 20th century he would have still been stubborn enough not to accept the peace if Hitler bombed them at Dunkirk.


Anonymous 11/27/2019 (Wed) 15:20:33 Id: 88987e [Preview] No.77268 del
D-Day likewise has nothing to do with him declaring war on the USA. All that did was make it official, he knew they would declare war on him since they were already attacking him via lend-lease and because they just declared war on Japan, another Axis country.
>3) Hitler knew a two-front war was something he had to avoid at all costs. He told many times that it was that which had lead to the defeat during WWI. But what does he do ? He attacks USSR before having destroyed England, thus creating a... two-front war.
Again, this man knows absolutely nothing about the actual military history of WWII. The British threat was practically neutralised before Barbarossa. They were stranded on an island, and lost in North Africa and Greece, only having any success in Iraq. The war between Germany and the USSR for the duration of 1941 was practically a one-front war.


Anonymous 11/27/2019 (Wed) 15:20:53 Id: 88987e [Preview] No.77269 del
>4) Hitler doesn't invade the strait of Gibraltar, which would have made him the master of the Mediterranean sea, thus preventing the battles of north Africa, and also the invasion of Italy and of the south of France. The communication lines between England and its empire (like India), would have been much more extended.
Invading Gibraltar would've put him at odds with Spain, which was neutral during the war and was previously supported by Germany (though Franco of course was later at some odds with him, he was never an enemy). Speaking of which...
>Maybe he would have been obliged to invade Spain also. But without the threat of an invasion in the south of Europe, he would have been able to remove troops from other areas, like Greece. And as Spain was exhausted by the war of 1936 (which had ended in 1939), it would have been very easy to defeat it.
Why would Germany turn against Spain, which it supported in a war of independence, and which would put them at odds with Portugal, which was a British ally? Fuck, this author is retarded.
>5) "The Jew Hitler refuses to even feint an attack on Britain to draw the British navy to the channel, were it could be obliterated by aircraft".
He could've baited the navy into the channel so it could've been destroyed by aircraft. It doesn't work like that.
>6) "The Jew Hitler declares war on the U.S., even though he was no more obliged to declare war on the U.S. than Japan was obliged to declare war on the Soviet Union, which Germany had been fighting since June 1941. Japan never declared war on the Soviet Union."
I've already covered this before. The US was already going to declare war on Germany, and so Hitler decided to declare war against it first. As it is said, a great power doesn't let nations declare war on it, but declares war on nations.
>7) "The Jew Hitler (against the advice of all his generals) single-handedly saves Moscow by ordering army group "Center" to stop its advance on Moscow".
Taking Moscow was an actual shitty move. The USSR wasn't going to end once Hitler took Moscow. They were already planning to move their capital to Kazan. Hitler's strategy of moving troops south to take the oil fields of the Caucasus and to secure Ukraine (the bread-basket of the country) was far better than that of his generals. Again, military mental midget.
>8) "The Jew Hitler tells the Soviets an attack will occur at Kursk. The Jew Hitler delays the attack for more than four months, until the Soviets have built defensive lines eight deep. The Soviets concentrate 1,300,000 soldiers with 3,600 tanks, 20,000 artillery pieces, including 6,000 76mm anti-tank guns, and 2,400 aircraft in and around Kursk. An attack anywhere other than Kursk would be fatal for the Soviets, but the Soviets seem to know that the attack will come only at Kursk."
>They knew it because the war was a fake one, planned by the jewish leaders.
Nonsense. British intel intercepted their plans and gave the intel to the Soviets. He never "told them an attack would happen at Kursk".
>"The Jew Hitler is amazed by the supermen of the elite SS Panzer Korps Liebstandarte, who, in the south, break through all eight defensive lines and take on the Soviet reserve tank battalions".
>"Less than two weeks into the offensive, worried that the Liebstandarte might win the battle for the Germans, the Jew Hitler strips this elite group of their tanks and ships them to Northern Italy, where they sit on their hands for some months before returning to the eastern front. The pretext of the Sicily invasion is used".
>As there was enough jews in the concentration camps, Hitler's mission was over, and then, he had to loose the war. And the unexpected success of the SS Panzer Korps Liebstandarte was not at all a part of the plan. So, he sent them far away.
Because northern Italy and southern France threatened the heartland of Germany itself. Maybe if the British accepted peace agreements, he would've kept all divisions east, but now that the western front has returned, protecting Germany and Italy themselves was a priority.


Anonymous 11/27/2019 (Wed) 15:22:55 Id: 88987e [Preview] No.77270 del
>This stupid strategy of being killed rather than retreating was also a part of the jewish plan. With an elastic defense, the war could have last two or three more years. But jewish leaders didn't need the war anymore. So, Hitler had to choose a stupid strategy which would accelerate the end of the war.
Retreating would've also lost in a bunch of German deaths and deserters. Fighting to the bitter end actually was a noble resort that the Wehrmacht went through.
>10) "The Jew Hitler refuses total mobilisation of the German people, even though the munitions factories cried out for manpower and all his enemies had recruited woman into the work force. The Jew Hitler never bothered to use half the potential German labor force."
Either because he wasn't some feminist that wanted women to work in the munitions factories (which he wasn't) or because he was secretly a jew.
>11) "And do you think (the Jew) Roosevelt would have forced the Japanese into the very destructive Pacific war, if he hadn't been certain Hitler would declare war on the United States? How was Roosevelt so sure Hitler would declare war on the United States. What if Hitler had just said, "Piss off, Roosevelt. Enjoy your little war against Japan." Then Roosevelt would have ended up just fighting the Japanese without being able to drag the United States into direct participation in the European war. ..... and it goes on and on ..... instance, after instance, of Hitler single-handedly losing the war for the Germans (and winning it for the Jews)."
Covered this before.
As you can see, the author, hexzane527 is totally childish and degenerate. He has no grasp of actual geopolitics and how acutal military strategy works. He just takes shit that jewish historians view as why Hitler failed and claims that those were just because Hitler was a Zionist.


Anonymous 11/27/2019 (Wed) 15:39:21 Id: a696f5 [Preview] No.77271 del
(70.25 KB 816x659 651.jpg)
>>77270
>Either because he wasn't some feminist that wanted women to work in the munitions factories (which he wasn't)
>or because he was secretly a jew.
What the fuck?


Anonymous 11/27/2019 (Wed) 15:59:01 Id: 88987e [Preview] No.77272 del
>>77271
I'm referencing the author's shitty logic.


Anonymous 11/29/2019 (Fri) 03:42:50 [Preview] No.77299 del
>>77267
There's also another thing. Now that an actual country called "Israel" exists the word "Zionism" causes much confusion to brainlets. The meaning of Zionism is thus:
>Advocacy for the interests of the State of Israel
This phrase "the State of Israel" doesn't mean a literal country, as it didn't exist back in Herzl's time. The State of Israel is pretty much a federation of the Jewish micronations within all of our own nations. Zionism basically entails working for the advancement of the status of Jews in the world, from lowly usurers to being grossly overrepresented in occupations in the financial, medical, political and entertainment spheres. Zionism means the creation of a new Jewish world order, not just taking over Palestine. If they just wanted Palestine, then they'd get the fuck out of our governments, press, banks, etc.
To get onto the real topic, people are calling Hitler "Zionist" because he was in favour of resettling all of Germany's, then the whole of Europe's, Jews in a place where they could pursue their own livelihood without sucking us dry; if you've read the 8/pol/ translation of "200 Years Together" by Pushkin then you'll find that they are VERY against doing honest work, as they "don't see themselves in any other occupation" than usury. This was actually the plan called the "Final Solution to the Jewish Problem": just deporting them hadn't worked, as they just destroyed our brother nations instead, so instead the Final Solution entailed resettling all of Europe's Jews so that their pernicious influence on us will cease.
Now, while some may think this was too lenient, it would certainly have solved the problem of Jewish influence for a while (it will probably be a bit harder to do so in modern times). Whether we need to consider genocide is another topic best discussed elsewhere.


Anonymous 12/01/2019 (Sun) 03:43:28 Id: 6a081e [Preview] No.77337 del
Miles Mathis is a faggot who combines very poorly done research with outright lies and often piggybacks on others' research. His biggest guest writer is Israeli (Josh G).
The main point of his paper is that Hitler is a form of Hildesheim or Hiller? Why? Because le Geni.com. While completely ignoring Maser's geneaology of Hitler.


Anonymous 12/01/2019 (Sun) 07:27:03 [Preview] No.77338 del
>>77299
Israel existed as a man and became tribes before Jews
Khazarians called themselves Jews
The dumbest Christians started believing Jews are Israel because Jews said so
Jews took Palestine and called it Israel
I have seen the false Christians who say Israel was Jews we are Jews everyone is a Jew
SATAN'S LIES! Today's Israelis are not Israel they are frauds
The frauds are CURSED for their TREACHERY
Jews have genetic diseases
Are weak and feeble
Their hearts are turned cold and evil by THEIR FATHER THE DEVIL
The Jews have an earthly kingdom and true prophets may feel the blade through their neck
But the Jews are risen up in their evil ways to prove God's power when Satan's children are struck down!


Anonymous 12/03/2019 (Tue) 21:40:04 [Preview] No.77417 del
(479.63 KB 1620x827 hitlerfamtree_large.png)
Hitler was definitely not a Jew. This has been established not only by ethnic analysis (https://ethnicelebs.com/adolf-hitler), but also by Jews themselves: https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/was-hitler-jewish
Pic related is the Hitler family tree to be found in the above link as well


Anonymous 12/04/2019 (Wed) 02:22:07 Id: a696f5 [Preview] No.77420 del
>>77417
As usual, jews insert lies into their rhetoric. The same is for that kike virtual library. There is not even a possibility of jewish ancestry in Hitler's DNA either.


Anonymous 12/04/2019 (Wed) 19:16:48 Id: 4acd18 [Preview] No.77445 del
>>77337
Mathis's "Battle of France" paper is even worse. He as a military mental midget claims that Blitzkrieg makes no sense because "tanks go slow ha ha ha".
Anybody taking that clown seriously shouldn't be taken seriously himself. Hardly anything of value comes out of his poor research, both in conspiracies, and in science and mathematics, and he's especially a gatekeeper when it comes to physics.


Anonymous 12/04/2019 (Wed) 23:58:33 Id: 45e982 [Preview] No.77451 del
The US is a police state, but nothing will change because Americans think everything is just fine.


Anonymous 12/11/2019 (Wed) 21:14:43 Id: ba58d4 [Preview] No.77678 del
(301.45 KB 1313x677 fuehrerdefines.png)


Anonymous 12/12/2019 (Thu) 13:39:41 Id: ba58d4 [Preview] No.77691 del
(136.13 KB 724x1024 worldview.jpg)


Anonymous 12/12/2019 (Thu) 17:14:04 Id: ba58d4 [Preview] No.77692 del
(81.52 KB 640x960 racialismdeGrelle.jpg)
(536.62 KB 2000x1000 meinkampfswastika.png)


Anonymous 12/14/2019 (Sat) 07:01:48 Id: a696f5 [Preview] No.77705 del
The shithead who came here to defend Israeli propaganda shill Mathis while claiming National Socialism was "shady", has had his pathetic effort deleted. Nobody gets away with insulting Hitler or NS here. There are plenty of other sites and boards that openly welcome jewish shilling and do fuck all about it. This board will never be one of them
Edited last time by AdolfHitler on 12/14/2019 (Sat) 07:02:56.


Anonymous 12/14/2019 (Sat) 12:40:36 Id: 4acd18 [Preview] No.77708 del
(17.92 KB 1205x81 joshfromisrael.PNG)
>>77705
He even admits to Josh being from Israel in his own page. From this we know he's from Israel, and he still lives in Israel.


sage sage 12/15/2019 (Sun) 01:08:45 Id: a9ddca [Preview] No.77718 del
>>77691
are you really still shilling for that tarrant faggot?
It's been months and you're still doing this shit


Anonymous 12/15/2019 (Sun) 04:19:44 Id: a696f5 [Preview] No.77724 del
>>77718
It might be because his ban expired for the waves of Siegetards banned for promoting violence. I'm surprised more didn't decide to come back and promote fucking Atomwaffen. The Leon Degrelle and Hitler quotes are decent, though.


Anonymous 01/21/2020 (Tue) 16:55:14 Id: c120ba [Preview] No.78390 del
This guy is a total race traitor and if not, a jew himself. He has an article on his "World War 3 explained" site saying that the jewish conspiracy is not actually jewish but a white conspiracy and that Israel is intended for whites to colonise the Middle East.


Anonymous 02/19/2020 (Wed) 21:11:32 Id: 3c234d [Preview] No.78598 del
Hitler was objectivity the greatest person to ever live. Up there with Jesus.


Anonymous 02/19/2020 (Wed) 22:17:26 Id: a696f5 [Preview] No.78599 del
(36.36 KB 178x264 1400.jpg)


Anonymous 03/28/2020 (Sat) 15:15:43 Id: 862869 [Preview] No.79096 del
(996.20 KB 828x1311 IMG_0279.jpeg)


Anonymous 03/28/2020 (Sat) 16:04:09 Id: a696f5 [Preview] No.79097 del
>>79096
While they tried to make it a villainy (as usual with de-nazification) simply by implying a restricted to indo-Europeans Hitler educated society, the world of Man in The High Castle Seasons 1 and 2 came across as perfect. Season 3 was when it became a clusterfuck. Idiots call it "dystopian". It's a utopian paradise.


Anonymous 04/13/2020 (Mon) 09:36:22 Id: 862869 [Preview] No.79304 del
(18.12 KB 680x169 doolittletrade.jpg)


Anonymous 04/13/2020 (Mon) 11:10:58 Id: a696f5 [Preview] No.79305 del
(84.76 KB 633x388 brin_neoteny.jpg)
(57.59 KB 658x245 download.png)
(31.83 KB 620x150 download (1).png)
>>79304
Fucking great. It looks like Propertarianism is yet another controlled opposition enemy of National Socialism. From his website: https://propertarianism.com/ with the addition that I added which are kikes while he merely blends them in.


Antifa cunt dox 05/16/2020 (Sat) 01:19:49 Id: 0bd02e [Preview] No.79852 del


Anonymous 05/16/2020 (Sat) 04:23:15 Id: ece096 [Preview] No.79853 del
>>77445
>>77337
Great thread, I remember reading something about Hitler being Jewish but it always was insane logic justifying the whole thing, sadly however it's a somewhat common beleif. Anyways great post, and would you mind sharing some of that physics stuff? I feel like laughing for a bit.


Anonymous 05/16/2020 (Sat) 04:40:36 Id: a696f5 [Preview] No.79857 del
>>79853
And when you come across that pathetic fucking lie, use this truth.


Anonymous 05/16/2020 (Sat) 17:24:42 Id: 1041d4 [Preview] No.79862 del
>>79305
lmao this dudes daughter married a pajeet.


Anonymous 05/16/2020 (Sat) 18:36:12 Id: cbfe8f [Preview] No.79864 del
>>79857
Thanks. Once I had to disprove this to my family, luckily they were already jew aware, so it wasn't hard, pointing out to the obvious contradiction and the lack Jewish shame was enough.


Anonymous Board owner 12/29/2020 (Tue) 21:12:55 Id: 2b3602 [Preview] No.83342 del
(103.19 KB 637x627 288.jpg)
Attention: "Is there any validity to this insult about Hitler?" questions: like the bullshit 8chan clone thread a shithead just shilled, also count as insulting Hitler and you will be banned for it
Therein that thread on that clone, as typical for Jim the jew's masonic front, there are numerous kikes insulting Hitler despite the few of wit whom respond with logic. 8chan filled up with jews because there was absolutely no moderation to stop them. The clone site is doing this as well because it's the same Jim shit. You post it here, you get banned. Either gain the ability to see past jewish lies or leave. It's that simple.
Edited last time by AdolfHitler on 12/30/2020 (Wed) 05:32:53.


Anonymous 01/03/2021 (Sun) 23:39:49 Id: 2057b4 [Preview] No.83403 del
>>83342
>Attention: "Is there any validity to this insult about Hitler?" questions: like the bullshit 8chan clone thread a shithead just shilled, also count as insulting Hitler and you will be banned for it
They really can't help themselves can they?


>The clone site is doing this as well because it's the same Jim shit.
Maybe they're the ones who endlessly shill other imageboards on this site? It would make sense. Who else would be involved in something so banal and stupid?


Anonymous 03/27/2021 (Sat) 01:22:37 Id: de32b2 [Preview] No.84306 del
>>83403
>They really can't help themselves can they?
Not when you're being payed to do it.
>Who else would be involved in something so banal and stupid?
Most links are for tor sites, and that shit has jew all over it.


Anonymous 02/01/2022 (Tue) 19:45:25 Id: b2703a [Preview] No.86349 del
(131.13 KB 960x686 1641931183265.jpg)
>>77267
Not a Hitler question for hoax debunking but related to 3rd reich.

Sometimes i see how shills spam crossdressing natsocs as a claim of "that they were degenerates unlike le based allies or soviets" so my concern is: Apart of those which were made as frontline bantz does anyone have confirmation these were post war made fabrications like that with "hitler and nymphs"?

Forward thanks for explenation.


Anonymous 02/02/2022 (Wed) 01:02:43 Id: 899486 [Preview] No.86353 del
>>86349
There is zero evidence of the old guard cross-dressing. Allied propaganda made up all kinds of ridiculous shit. The only 'related' images you're going to see is past 1945 faggots RPing their kink. Cosplay does not make anyone a National Socialist. The lies about homosexuality and crossdressing (accusing Göring) mostly came from H. R. Knickerbocker out of his revenge for being deported from Berlin in 1933. He worked for the New York Evening Post. Göring married Carin von Kantzow until she died in 31' then had his daughter Edda Göring with his second wife Emmy Sonnemann. The common lie about The Night of Long Knives, as Strasserist Nazbol traitors like to blindly claim, is that "Hitler was backstabbing loyal party members". The truth is of course different. The Night of Long Knives meant the SA revolution planned by Röhm. Kikes love to claim all over their "sources" that the Röhm-Putsch was "so-called". It's the typical eye-rolling not accepting the truth by jewish and jew-brainwashed historians as always. Standartenführer Julius Uhl and Röhm's chief of the SA guard was intended to be Hitler's executioner. It is possible that the Brown-shirts' excess partying and vandalism encouraged by Ernst Röhm pissed off high-ranking SS and Third Reich Supreme Court Judge Walter Buch. On the homosexuality of Röhm, the rumors came from SPD and KPD (Willi Münzenberg) Communists and many types exiled from Germany for their depravity. Then after the war, Samuel Igra the exiled jew wrote Germany's National Vice wherein the kike accused both Röhm and Hitler of being homosexual. Many such books and films of lies have been made since. Realize jews are always the origins of these hoaxes.


Anonymous 02/02/2022 (Wed) 06:06:54 Id: b2703a [Preview] No.86354 del
(101.06 KB 940x1024 1642660956121.jpg)
>>86353
>The lies about homosexuality and crossdressing (accusing Göring) mostly came from H. R. Knickerbocker out of his revenge for being deported from Berlin in 1933. He worked for the New York Evening Post.
Now that explains a lot.

>The only 'related' images you're going to see is past 1945 faggots RPing their kink.
So my suspicion was right that such material was made after the war.


Anonymous 02/10/2022 (Thu) 02:38:32 Id: 0e9c8b [Preview] No.86456 del
(83.38 KB 600x500 dirlewanger.jpeg)
Can someone debunk Dirlewanger being a "rapist"? as well the horrible "atrocities" that is charged against the Dirlewanger brigade.


Anonymous 02/10/2022 (Thu) 14:26:43 Id: 899486 [Preview] No.86465 del
>>86456
Someone asked about Dirlewanger February 26th of 2020 in the old Meta Thread 5 >>78745 with the exact same image. They were given an answer almost two years ago. >>78746 And then in QTDDTOT June 2020, there was specific claiming as "fact" (through TOR posting lies) that Dirlewanger was a "degenerate criminal and he was given command over a bunch of other degenerate criminals " >>80792 Everything is easily found on this board if you know where to look.

Dirlewanger was SS-Oberführer of the 36th Waffen Grenadier Division who was tasked with eliminating violent Communist partisans. Which in war time had to happen. Your question is obviously laced with intent.


Anonymous 02/13/2022 (Sun) 10:03:40 Id: b2703a [Preview] No.86473 del
>>86353
>The only 'related' images you're going to see is past 1945 faggots RPing their kink.

From far what i remember werent these published in some degenerate magazine from 60s?


Anonymous 02/13/2022 (Sun) 16:56:39 Id: 899486 [Preview] No.86474 del
(102.93 KB 924x693 stalag-cover-2.jpg)
>>86473
Israel's Stalag fiction where kikes got off to drawn depictions was 50s through 60s. Though when I said past 1945 faggots RPing their kink, I meant literal faggots. Like when kikes post images of fags in furry suits or BDSM with NS swastikas and pretending that's "all National Socialists" when it's really just gays doing a LARP. The typical propaganda a raging jew would post.


Anonymous 02/13/2022 (Sun) 19:25:00 Id: b2703a [Preview] No.86475 del
(491.10 KB 318x200 1639170406765.gif)
>>86474
>Israel's Stalag fiction where kikes got off to drawn depictions was 50s through 60s
Weren't these pioneering usage of NS imagery in porn industry and then were removed from sale because of (((trial))) of Adolf Eichmann?

>Though when I said past 1945 faggots RPing their kink, I meant literal faggots.
I know and that was my point of question above. Logically since it was before internet it needed to be published somewhere and for enough retarded people (or shills) it does not matter that the photography is way advanced with its B&W quality surpasing the 1930s-1945 ones having late 20th century B&W quality, if the magazine etc is digitalized like that article for some french Hitler mocking comedy film showing the Hitler and nymphs hoax photo (which is just a screenshot from film itself just to note) and someone here has it (which i hope someone have since here i can see actual debunking of black propaganda) it would give me more heavy ammunition on such type of shill who spams such degeneracy and showing H.R. Knickerbocker and his tantrum from being expelled and others is not enough.


Anonymous 02/13/2022 (Sun) 19:45:00 Id: 2057b4 [Preview] No.86482 del
>>86475
>>86473
We actually have a lot of info on that in the Official infographics and webms thread. >>79824

I think you'll find most of the answers you want there


Anonymous 02/14/2022 (Mon) 04:28:34 Id: 899486 [Preview] No.86484 del
(12.16 KB 169x198 not Hitler.jpg)
(16.24 KB 224x291 also not Hitler.jpg)
>>86475
Eichmann's trial was in 61 and Stalags in yiddsrael where banned in 62, so that makes sense. Hitler and the nymphs? I know about Adolf Ziegler's Four Elements, but not sure what you mean. If it's either of these two images, then you can easily tell they're not Hitler. I cropped them because no-one should show the full pictures here. They're flat out lies. The one where he's surrounded by naked women and blindfolded is from a 1970s National Lampoon magazine. Probably the March 1972 issue but I'm not sure. I won't pay insane money for a collector's item mocking Hitler. The other is where fake Hitler has a handful of breast. Both frauds, obviously.


Anonymous 02/14/2022 (Mon) 06:02:07 Id: b2703a [Preview] No.86485 del
>>86484
>If it's either of these two images, then you can easily tell they're not Hitler.
Yes its these two where someone just cut the picture from magazine gave it noise and then shipped it as historical photo.


Anonymous 02/14/2022 (Mon) 15:08:16 Id: b2703a [Preview] No.86490 del
(41.61 KB 292x400 s-l400.jpg)
>>86484
>Probably the March 1972 issue but I'm not sure.
Yes its from March 1972, (additional info: the person imitating Hitler on pictures at "stranger at paradise" and cover of said issue is swiss ex acrobat Billy Frick)
As support of confirmation of issue and for future references i am adding the cover of magazine.

>>86482
Almost forgot on this
>I think you'll find most of the answers you want there.
Thanks for recommendarion, i hope i will find what i search


Anonymous 04/25/2022 (Mon) 02:30:05 Id: 5c6013 [Preview] No.87218 del
(129.81 KB 1000x750 himmler and gudrun.jpeg)
Did Himmler meet with the World Jewish Congress and try to negotiate the freeing of Jews from camps? I have heard this claim before but I want to know the legitimacy of it. I'm bringing this up because today someone just shilled it to me after I brought up the fact Himmler had a copy of the holy lance and a crucifix at his desk at Wewelsburg castle. It is also said in Hitler's last testament that he calls Himmler a traitor but as we know this is a forgery by François Genoud.


Anonymous 04/25/2022 (Mon) 03:30:40 Id: 899486 [Preview] No.87219 del
(103.19 KB 637x627 288.jpg)
>>87218
Kikes who write that particular story (such as Stanley Goldman) reference the jews Norbert Masur, Isaac Einhorn, Lena Einhorn, Dan Porat, Yehuda Bauer, Allan Firestone, Jerry Cooper and last but most importantly: Raphael Lemkin who coined 'genocide' and began the 'Genocide Convention'. Whenever there is shit talking about National Socialists of any kind, it usually originates from a jewish circle jerk. These so called "historians" are just jews referencing each other around and around. They enjoy their absurd lies.


Anonymous 04/25/2022 (Mon) 05:32:12 Id: 5c6013 [Preview] No.87220 del
>>87219
>These so called "historians" are just jews referencing each other around and around. They enjoy their absurd lies.
Yeah, I just checked and the article they sent me was published by a fucking "derkdeklein".


Anonymous 04/25/2022 (Mon) 11:33:14 Id: 899486 [Preview] No.87222 del
(63.53 KB 648x410 Twitter kike.jpg)
>>87220
Yeah this is Dirk de Klein @DirkJohannes. He's not "Dutch", just another Twitter jew parasite. You can tell easily by his irresistible urge to promote the tired old holocaust lie and insult Hitler. Stanley Goldman who referenced those numerous kikes was the author of 'The Jew Who Met Himmler - And Other Stories'. They even call their narratives fictional and stories, yet there are masses of morons out there who still believe them. Gentile traitors have authored such lying books as well, but they always referenced jews. Every lie about the NSDAP originates from kikes.


Anonymous 04/25/2022 (Mon) 13:37:24 Id: 35a7bd [Preview] No.87223 del
(17.84 KB 320x325 1650436510047.jpg)
>>87222
>They even call their narratives fictional and stories, yet there are masses of morons out there who still believe them.
That reminded me on how many people buy the nareative of schindlers list as real event


Anonymous 04/26/2022 (Tue) 01:43:49 Id: 2057b4 [Preview] No.87225 del
(52.99 KB 1200x675 7874845.jpeg)
>>87223
>That reminded me on how many people buy the nareative of schindlers list as real event

It's fake. Entire movie is based off a fictional book.

I say fiction because it literally says fiction right there on it's wiki page. No I am not making this up

>Schindler's Ark is a Booker Prize-winning historical fiction novel published in 1982 by Australian novelist Thomas Keneally. The United States edition of the book was titled Schindler's List; it was later reissued in Commonwealth countries under that name as well. The novel was also awarded the Los Angeles Times Book Prize for Fiction in 1983.

>Poldek Pfefferberg, a Holocaust survivor and Schindlerjude,[4] inspired Keneally to write Schindler's Ark. After the war, Pfefferberg had tried on a number of occasions to interest the screenwriters and filmmakers he met through his business in making a film based on the story of Schindler and his efforts to save Polish Jews from the Nazis, as well as arranging several interviews with Schindler for American television.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schindler%27s_Ark

It literally says it's fake


Anonymous 04/26/2022 (Tue) 03:01:56 Id: 35a7bd [Preview] No.87233 del
>>87225
>It literally says it's fake
And that is my point despite being a fiction people buy it as real event that happened


Anonymous 04/30/2022 (Sat) 21:04:33 Id: 2057b4 [Preview] No.87257 del
(3.56 MB 506x394 moonman.gif)
>>87233
>>87233
>And that is my point despite being a fiction people buy it as real event that happened

Sorry about that. Didn't mean to include "It's fake." when respoding.

Only wanted to share the information that I had.


Anonymous 06/26/2022 (Sun) 10:26:04 Id: 4ec584 [Preview] No.87877 del
Don't mind me, just posting a cute picture of uncle Adolf I found.


Anonymous 06/27/2022 (Mon) 04:41:46 Id: 899486 [Preview] No.87881 del
>>87877
"Don't demonize an entire people" they said. "Prejudice against a group is wrong" they said. It would be funny how backwards everything is now, if one had a sick sense of humor.


Anonymous 09/02/2022 (Fri) 18:43 Id: 277658 [Preview] No.88386 del
Posting the hunted piece of zions pilbul for awareness and debunking if someone is still willing since this is thread for such activity.
I found this piece of zions black propaganda from 4pol on the one of the "lebensborn is last straw for me to not support nazis because i believe some twat who said it was harem org." which is often posted by some ancap autist who always derails anything related to NS.

Note i know this is one of the many jews black propaganda and as same stupid as the "hitler on march with kurt eisners portrait" but always awarenes of poison is awarenes


Anonymous 09/02/2022 (Fri) 18:43 Id: 277658 [Preview] No.88387 del
(1016.63 KB 1438x2002 1662105955021745.jpg)
>>88386
Forgot the pic


Anonymous 09/03/2022 (Sat) 00:38 Id: 899486 [Preview] No.88388 del
>>88386
>>88387
I haven't read the entire article, so I don't know much more about what that man had to say about Hitler. So far it tracks besides the insult about not passing an intelligence test. Hitler had keen intelligence. He was well read and quoted authors on the fly in conversations. He was a brilliant tactician. World War 2 was lost because his lackluster Generals gave bad invasion orders in his absence when he was sick. It's possible he didn't give two shits about the mail-carrier job. Not caring does not amount to stupidity. Hitler's family members were dying off under the care of jewish doctors so he had to stay with his friend August Kubizek and did not eat well during that economic turmoil. The only boss I'm aware of him ever having was General Staff Officer Karl Mayr of the Army Intelligence Division in the Reichswehr. It was Ludendorff whom ordered Mayr to order Hitler to join the Deutsche Arbeiterpartei. Many lies are told about both Generals. Neither were jewish. If Hitler had another job, Kubizek would have mentioned it.

No one turns from believing in Hitler once they discover he is consistently lied about. Especially not for such a petty a reason as that. Every time some shill says they used to follow him but changed their mind, it's obvious to me they're jews pulling typical jewish deception tactics. Those who hate Hitler have always hated him. There is nothing about the man that turns a mind seeking truth away. It is in the blood of kikes to despise any man who speaks truth entirely.


Anonymous 09/03/2022 (Sat) 09:20 Id: 277658 [Preview] No.88390 del
>>88388
>, so I don't know much more about what that man had to say about Hitler
Typical he was useless incompetent cowardly backstabbing sellout narcisist who cared only about himself and used anyone on disposal working for anyone to furfill himself.
Recapitulated in terms of orea linda book the basically a description of Magi ie the evil man who twists good into his sinister aims.

>Every time some shill says they used to follow him but changed their mind, it's obvious to me they're jews pulling typical jewish deception tactics.
And a very miserable one from my experience since it always slips into slippery slope since jew cannot into either chronology or maths.
Jjst like with any jew who wanted to turn me into lolbert it always turned from
>Its about freedom for all
Into
>The present degeneracy is good because its good for business and profitable and as long as people tolerate it despite the conditions or how it got in first place its consented and approved and those whom dont tolerate it must be turned into degenerates for chosen people but remember freedom and free market is still for everyone altrough i said before that actualy its not because you dont grind me shekels



Top | Return | Catalog | Post a reply