>>12539
TYB!
This is BO, right? I thought the baker was some new guy who'd been practicing after seeing the practice bake.

Something to be aware of:
the e-bake instructions I created say there are six pages in the dough; now you have seven. Now that's fine--i can revise the instructions, just wanted to ask.

One other thing:
I hesitate to mention this, but would feel kind of neglectful not to skip something that seems a bit confusing.

IMO, better not to stick in a page break at the TOP of the first page of the dough; instead, wait til the BOTTOM for page break 1.
This means deleting the following from the top of the paste:

Q Research General #__: Blah Blah Blah Edition
////////////////////// 1 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Instead, just start with "Welcome to Q Anon Research."

Why? Because whoever is baking is not actually typing the bread title into the dough in the "message" field--it's already in the dough (from filling in the "subject" field, which usually happens much earlier; most bakers do it at the start to avoid a last-minute rush).

Do what you wish, just my two cents worth.

Here are CAPS for Q Research bread. Thought you might find these useful as a reference if you don't have.

>>12563
He did indeed. They are still playing by one playbook and expect him to also. But of course he isn't which confuses and confounds them - he doesn't respond the way he is supposed to and consider this:

POTUS has tens of millions of people who will come out in the middle of the week, take off work, camp overnight just to attend a rally. They are pleasant and polite to each other, don't trash the place (outside or inside) and security is not necessary because of them but to protect them (and POTUS ofc) from the leftist mob.
He also has millions more in the digital space, and not limited to Americans, who many times are proactive, search information for themselves and will rally to his cause in a heartbeat. Why? Because his cause is OUR cause, and people know it.
>I'm with you

On the other side:
They have to pay people to protest.
Their speaking engagements for the public are pitiful indeed (you can't really call them "rallies")
They have to pay people to make comments in their favor onine
They have to organize campaigns against POTUS/his agenda, and those people engage in littering disrespect to LEO and harass people
They have to cheat to in any election
The public does not accept their agenda so they have to ram it through the courts

Disney Parks today.

Today' parks are more apocalypse YOLO, than the former image of cardboard conformity.

Eggstein.
There is a compiled pdf (on site) of this useful Epstein information.

>12592

Remote and ineffectual shill
That dared attack my president
With that poor weapon, half-impelled,
Unlearnt, unsteady, hardly held,
Unworthy for a tilt with men—
Your quavering and corroded pen;
Shill poor at Bed and worse at Table,
Shill pinched, shill starved, shill miserable;
Shill stuttering, shill with roving eyes,
Shill nervous, shill of crudities;
Shill clerical, shill ordinary,
Shill self-absorbed and solitary;
Shill here-and-there, shill epileptic;
Shill puffed and empty, shill dyspeptic;
Shill middle-class, shill sycophantic,
Shill dull, shill brutish, shill pedantic;
Shill hypocritical, shill bad,
Shill furtive, shill three-quarters mad;
Shill (since a man must make an end),
Shill that shall never be my friend.

>>12578
...hmmm, same incitement post as before
fuck off mockingbird
that dumb shit never works
no one here is violent, nor wants violence
YOU FAIL AGAIN

'BREAKING: Fox News reports:

-Mueller allegedly lied under oath when he said he was not interviewing for FBI Director

-Investigation into origins into Russia probe to be released this month

-DOJ investigation w/John Durham is rapidly expanding due to how much they are finding'
https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1181706438562828289
>-Mueller allegedly lied under oath when he said he was not interviewing for FBI Director

>>12627
These people are stupid?

>>12613
"kicked off" is Not a thing on nets these days.
yer behind by abit.
>multiple instances... its all in the multiple instances.
>>12633
anytime... needed skills on this side... twas abit light
heh.
its producing well naow thœ.
ty fer the work mæıng.
>>12643
and Don could stop all this shit anytime.
=muhplan.

White House refuses to cooperate with impeachment investigation
The latest White House move, announced in a defiant letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, came just hours after the administration blocked the testimony of the U.S. ambassador to the E.U., Gordon Sondland.
Oct. 8, 2019, 9:16 PM UTC / Updated Oct. 9, 2019, 12:55 AM UTC
By Shannon Pettypiece and Kristen Welker
https://web.archive.org/web/20191009012137/https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry/white-house-refuses-turn-over-documents-democrats-impeachment-inquiry-n1063771
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi responded to the letter Tuesday, accusing the president of "trying to make lawlessness a virtue."

"This letter is manifestly wrong, and is simply another unlawful attempt to hide the facts of the Trump Administration’s brazen efforts to pressure foreign powers to intervene in the 2020 elections," Pelosi wrote. "Despite the White House’s stonewalling, we see a growing body of evidence that shows that President Trump abused his office and violated his oath to ‘protect, preserve and defend the Constitution.''"

Pelosi warned that Trump was not above the law and that continued efforts to hide Trump's abuse of power would be "regarded as further evidence of obstruction."

The White House argued that in order for the Democrats to make their inquiry valid the House would have to take a number of steps, including holding a full vote to beginning impeachment proceedings, allowing Republicans to issue subpoenas and granting the White House the ability to cross-examine witnesses and have access to evidence.

But even if the House took those actions, it is unclear whether the White House would then cooperate, said a senior administration official.

“We are avoiding saying there is no way we would ever cooperate,” the official said. “What we have done is explain the flaws under the current circumstances, and how changes could address those flaws and what that might hold for the future, I don’t want to predict now.”

There is little in the Constitution outlining how impeachment should be carried out. The document merely states broadly that the House "shall have the sole Power of Impeachment" and that "the Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.”

In making a case for why the executive branch should be able to dictate what actions the legislative branch must take, the White House cited how past impeachments were handled and the basic due process defendants are allowed in the judicial process.

NANCY'S RESPONSE:
https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/10819-0
“For a while, the President has tried to normalize lawlessness. Now, he is trying to make lawlessness a virtue. The American people have already heard the President’s own words – ‘do us a favor, though.’ The President’s actions threaten our national security, violate our Constitution and undermine the integrity of our elections. The White House letter is only the latest attempt to cover up his betrayal of our democracy, and to insist that the President is above the law.

“This letter is manifestly wrong, and is simply another unlawful attempt to hide the facts of the Trump Administration’s brazen efforts to pressure foreign powers to intervene in the 2020 elections. Despite the White House’s stonewalling, we see a growing body of evidence that shows that President Trump abused his office and violated his oath to ‘protect, preserve and defend the Constitution.’

“The White House should be warned that continued efforts to hide the truth of the President’s abuse of power from the American people will be regarded as further evidence of obstruction.

“Mr. President, you are not above the law. You will be held accountable.”

↔

https://www.redstate.com/alexparker/2019/10/08/revolt-believe-political-attack-police-officers-minnesota-banding-together-support-trump/
As indicated by Lt. Bob Kroll, president of the Police Officers Federation of Minneapolis, The Donald will be bolstered by lotsa law enforcement dudes and dudettes sporting red “Cops for Trump” shirts.

>>12796
>if POTUS was listening, what would Anons tell POTUS?

thank you Sir
cannot begin to express the gratitude
and honor of being allowed to serve as
a digital soldier for God & Country
anons have your 6. always. o7

>What would they ask?

<ANONS are selfless, nameless, faceless, fameless, and FEARLESS.

if this anon was to be selfish: job after mission is complete; that you let anons' immediate family know anons' role.