Yikes, so much CP on both sites, with short bans if ever.
Yet certain BOs giving 5 year range bans for normal YouTube links...

>>19538

Correct, Child Porn is a 1-2 day ban, while YouTube links of weather and current news is a 5 year ban, no appeal accepted.

>>19538
>>19543
False comparison. The "youtube ban" was not issued by the global team.

As for the short ban of the csam:
It is useless to ban long term, because no matter if we ban or not, next occasion the spammer uses a different IP. But on one go he could post on 8-12 boards, and if caught in the act with a ban he can be stopped for that round. Why let him post 8-12 times, when can be reduced to 1-3?
The IPs the spammer uses are discardable for him, which means either Tor on clearnet address, proxies, or VPNs. All can be used by other people than the spammer. So issuing a long ban on them would block innocent people from posting.

>>19544
Yea, it's totally not possible to log in and out of global mod accounts and switch to a board owner account, or have multiple board members who are also global mods, etc... "Many such cases."
Also as you pointed out: VPNs; making Any long term range ban useless and only "block innocent people from posting" until they use a VPN or other....
Expect Us

>>19545
>it's totally not possible to log in and out of global mod accounts and switch to a board owner account
This is really a great topic for you because despite I can tell you the facts that:
1. I am not the BO of that particular board or any other that you use;
2. I do not have a second account;
3. I do not know if any of the global staff has alternative accounts - used or not as BO account of any board;
and you can always say I'm lying, and sweep everything off the table. I can't give evidence on something that does not exists - but to be frank the burden of proof is on you.
And you have nothing but this malicious idea, an accusation which basis only exists in your mind. But you can spread it, creating only suspicion, denigrating our character. So, so typical.
What will be next? Demanding us to de-anonymize ourselves? Check everyone for hidden accounts?
Let's go into the hypothetical:
What if a global is a BO of too? What if he sees an issue on the board where he is BO, and decides he won't ban on global level, won't ban the user from the whole site, but on local, and only on the board? How unjust!! Right? Do you want all the bans to be global? It would make my job here easier since you could not post, and won't need to continue this pointless conversation.

>>19505
Why did IGA keep posting those meal images flooding his board though ?

As of 2024, Australia's national IQ score was 99.24.
In 2019, Forbes ranked Australia 16th in the world for smartest countries, with an average IQ of 99.2.
In Australia, IQ scores are typically classified into the following categories:
Very superior: 130+
Superior: 120–129
High average: 110–119
Average: 90–109
Low average: 80–89
Borderline: 70–79
Intellectually disabled: 69 and below
Scores of 120–130 or higher are generally considered to be in the gifted range.

>>19508
If you have below 80 IQ you are mentally retarded and over 110 you are a genius from what I've heard all my life. I think maybe they are lowering the bar for humanity today. Pretty sad.

>>19500
>I know nothing of how the EU works.
You do not.

>>19503
Such cases.

>>19505
>IGA created his own board and it was really comfy
It wasn't bad.

>>19508
I pray no other country opens a neetboard then.

Still seething bud?

1. click "Moderate Thread"
2. pin post
3. ???
4. PROFIT

Very interesting

Well, we don't really intervene in what BOs do as long as they keep the global rules.
There are many other boards where things can be posted (pick one that fits the theme), and a new board can be opened if the user is up to be a Board Owner himself, or better yet claim an unused one, delete the crap if there are any, and invite/attract users, to discuss the topic, or open new ones.

>>19444
That is a National Socialist, NAZI board & BO, not "Christian".

This thread >>>/agatha2/85627 is bugged. It's visible in index and catalog but if you try to open it it gives 404. Can this be fixed?

>>19432
Solved some time ago.

all the replies in threads on /ziemniachan/ are getting deleted
what the hell is going on over there
send help

Is post deletion broken? Whenever I try to delete a post, it fails.

>>19476
Broken

>>19459
It looks like the issue was solved. Thanks again for your help.

>>19460
127.0.0.1

>>19461
This shouldn't have happened to be honest.

>>19462
Role signature.

>>19462
Yeah it's weird that the option to delete posts by users who made them would let someone delete literally all the posts xD
I assume there's no way to bring back the deleted posts?

Wait, so if "Block users from deleting their posts" is not checked in board settings, then anyone can delete any post on that board?
Then other boards which have not set this option are also at risk of this exploit.
Can Admin automatically update this setting for all boards or something, before whole of Endchan gets deleted?

>>19406
a separate user that's unhappy is attempting to fork the moderation and keep the commentary the same here: >>>/polfree/ so if you want more content and different/better mod rules check this out

Generally: give us 72 hours to reply.

>>19390
There is a "don't index on top boards and board list" checkbox on the board management page.

So. As him >>19395 said BOs can exclude the board from the boards list and the top boards index.
This does not exclude the board however from the overboard, the latest posts, and the new images feed.
Imageboards did not mean to be private chatrooms. Surely other solutions, platforms exist that suitable for that purpose. We're gladly host your content (as you said it is not illegal) but there are limitations, both of the engine and the format (the "genre" if you will).

>>19396
Role signature for validation.

>>19396
I think that option does exclude the board from the latest posts feed. But not from the overboard or recent images.

>>19303
Та шиз угарный, всегда с его паст проигрываю

> Ignore this faggot. He is trying to get ownership over /bb/ board to himself. Literally every post from this fag is about how he can run the board better than the current admins
I'm just regular anon. Мне нахуй не надо мочухом становиться и бесплатно парашу драить, уже есть человек, который этим должен заниматься
> /bb/ has always been this way. It's a board dedicated to discussing drugs you dumb fuck. Of course there are people who discuss fapping on stimulants
Yeah, everyday there is 5-10-15 posts about fapping on salt and cumming like a pig, or about jews, and now this is crazy, literally whole general thread in shizo posts and arguing with himself. Not only that, this maggot answer to almost every post from normal anons. If you write something about weed he will answer something like that "bruh, weed is shit, try fap your ass on salt" and this is to almost every post, everyday. And everyday he posts questions about how to fuck your ass properly on bath salt

>>19305
Никто тебе ничего не должен, уебок.
Ах да, ты вроде съебать собирался

ебать какие наркоманы нежные пошли
прорал с соевых снежинок

So, what's the final outcome? Haven't visited bb in a month, noticed there's a new mod. And I think the troll calmed down a bit, at least I don't see as many of his posts.

>>12145
>Why not use LynxChan's "allow people on the spammer IP list to post using a block bypass" option?
That would require a CAPTCHA that cannot be cracked using automation/outsourcing. The bans would also serve no purpose if you could keep clearing the cache and reapplying it.

>>18492
The bans serve no purpose if "Disallow tor posters" is disabled either, anyone can just go to a tor mirror, enter the block bypass captcha, and keep posting.

I'm gonna give this a bump.

>>19150
disallow tor now disallowed block bypass now too

If this goes through then torposting is a thing per board and i'm dumb