>>10257
>click reload
I did, 20 times, and it kept saying "wrong answer or expired captcha". that's the issue

>wtf
if you can complete no cookie captcha with javascript disabled in the same tab then post some screenshots and a tutorial

>>10253
<works for me
learn to type faggot

>>10264
kill yourself illiteratespergy

>>11682
captcha

>>11327
You can select these particular elements you want to hide with the :nth-child(x) selector, where the x is the number of the element.
The elements of the form is in the table and the "Password" and "Drawing" fields are in the 5th and 6th table rows, or in the 4th and 5th if you force anonymity via your board's settings (ie. no "Name" field).
Then you can use display: none; css rule to hide elements (there are other options, if you prefer something else you can use that ofc);
Since no other table rows on the page you could use the following:

tr:nth-child(4), tr:nth-child(5) {
  display: none;
}

Or:

tr:nth-child(5), tr:nth-child(6) {
  display: none;
}

Depending on the Name field, as I wrote above. This is important, you don't want to hide captcha accidentally or something.

This thread?

https://web.archive.org/web/20170603035754/http://endchan.xyz/tech/res/597.html

The board was slid by a spammer. Endchan doesn't keep backups.

Damn, you saved my ass, didn't even check if it was already archived. I'm an idiot. Thanks dude.

woah

valid?

>>9177
dude woah, wut?

Btw /agatha2/index.rss is broken. There is an XML parsing error due to

`

&

`

in the title. It should be replaced with

`

&amp

`

. Other boards like /news/ have the same problem, while those not having & have a functioning index.rss, like /operate/index.rss or /polru/index.rss .
You can check if an RSS feed is valid with an RSS feed validator like https://validator.w3.org/feed .

>>18804
made a fix for this.

>>18851
Thank you. Seems good now.

Speaking of feature requests: we're still waiting on the Odilitime jock strap crotch-cam live stream RSS feed.

>>18900

kys

I'm not aware that the contents of the subject field can be edited. 8kun uses a different board engine, what feature one imageboard supports other chans might not.
I think a good rule to follow (with the editable part of the posts too) is to think first, then post.

>>11557
See? Forgot the role signature. Here it is for validation.

>>11557
sounds like mistakes in subject field are irrevocable, then.
kind of a problem for this board, because it's a bu when msm crashes 8kun, so when it's active, it's very fast and different people with dif experience levels are making threads - mistakes inevitably happen.

Would you consider making the subject field editable (i guess the question is, Why not? If the programming isn't onerous, it would be a real plus.)

>>11560
thanks for reply btw
appreciate it.

>>11560
There are a couple of projects going on in parallel - besides the busyness of the daily life - I really doubt we will implement subject editing in the foreseeable future, but it is an intriguing suggestion, so I'm gonna nag the development team, maybe they'll say "easy peasy lemon squeezy, here it is. E.".

wait. OP/insaneposter is not odili? or is he odili and pretending not to be?

>>10237
I'll talk to Lynx about it. Surprised they're not already.

>>10266
maybe they are >>10095

>>10292
ah ok i see >>10109

>>26346
Why sir?

Thanks for the report.

Bring it up to /pol/ in the future to remove any calls for violence. They will be taken down. The Feds crying about censorship will not change deletion of their attempts.

>>10805
No. You live alongside of other communities. Like many other users here on Endchan, I am not here merely to accommodate you or your board. If Tor reporting is blocked on /pol/ it ends up here.

I realize this is not an ideal situation. In that respect I emphasize the following:

1. Unblocking Tor reporting may not be an option as too many others use it to play troll-ball with /pol/.
2. This thread is not a criticism of /pol/.
3. This thread is not meant to be a challenge to /pol/.
4. The Endchan /pol/ mod staff have always been reliable and consistent in dealing with these issues when they are available to do so.
5. Not even our site admins can babysit things 24x7.

Like occasional CP postings from times past, this was an emergency whole site compromising situation without the traditional means to report it. The situation was dealt with. Thank you, Mr. Global. This thread now has no purpose other than to attract meaningless grousing. We already have a /pol/ containment thread here if further bitching about this or whatever issue is required. I suggest it may be worthwhile to delete or lock this thread to allow everyone move on.

>>10806
>If Tor reporting is blocked on /pol/ it ends up here.
/pol/ doesn't block Tor reporting. Of course we bring up the fact that the Tor project has many jews on their team whenever there's a /pol/ Tor shitpost. However, Tor is not restricted by me with any settings. Such settings don't even exist. The punishment since I can't ban Tor is to delete their shitposts. Genuine intelligent posting by Tor users is left alone. I have never tried reporting on Tor because I refuse to use it. As for your other points, I'm not suggesting otherwise. The point being, I as the BO of /pol/ have no control over how the site as a whole works. If you're having issues with Tor reporting, start a Twitter account and bring it up to Odilitime. The Meta thread on /pol/ is a sticky. You may post from Tor there and reference the offending thread as an alternative to reporting.

>>10806
And to be clear, I'm not asking you to accommodate /pol/. I'm inviting you to post issues in the Meta thread there. Whatever you choose is your choice.

Note: it is possible to get a "banned" alert if you use an IP which was banned previously (it could be a proxy, or VPN, or even a legit residential IP if it is distributed as dynamic IP).
I asked when was the ban because I checked the last couple of days in the logs (they are public, home page has the link to them) and I've found no ban with the reason "real spam".

>>19665
An hour or 2 ago.

>>19667
Ah. No such ban was issued.
However some time ago in tandem with the usual cp spam there was another one that said "real rape of women" or something the like. I believe the ban message denotes that particular one. In this case the IP you used was banned some time ago, and wasn't issued to your post with screenshots of a libre vidya game.

>>20290
From: https://support.torproject.org/faq/staying-anonymous/
>Ultimately the best protection is a social approach: the more Tor users there are near you and the more diverse their interests, the less dangerous it will be that you are one of them. Convince other people to use Tor, too!
I will like to say:
"There's only one thing this place needs, more Tor posters."

>>27338
An hour or 2 ago.

Here two examples of id-less posters in a board with ids enabled
>>>/dump/1085
>>>/dump/1086

to be more specific, every post, when looked at in the moderation mode, has an hash of the ip address
the id-less posts lack any hashed ip, they are basically ip-less, so it's impossible to ban them

this isn't the first time i've seen these odd information-lacking posts on boards, they stand out pretty much usually, but i can't find more examples at the moment

is this an expected behaviour for the site? or what could be causing this occurrence?

>>19088
>>19089
Posters using tor and posting through the onion domain will not have ids or IP hashes.

You can disable posting from Tor in the board settings.

As posters noted above those are users posting via Tor or Lokinet. They don't get IDs or IP hashes, they are all count as 1 poster (on the whole site) and they aren't included the number of posters on the board page.
BOs can disallow the use of Tor on their board, that option was included in case of certain attacks. I encourage you not to choose using it, unless it's absolutely necessary.

>>19090
>>19091
>>19092
I see, thanks for the answers

There is a maximum amount of threads. It's the default. BOs can decrease it.
Imageboards weren't meant to be used as archives, and as opposed to regular forums threads are ephemeral by design. You could archive threads with some online tools, liek:
https://web.archive.org/save
https://archive.ph/

>>18419
ah, alright, no worries then. I think the threads are already archived anyway, it just would have been nice to have some way to keep them on the board, the nature of the threads on this particular board being intended to be a bit less ephemeral than those on others.

>>18420
Alternative suggestion:
- save the page of a thread
- zip it
- upload the zip to a dedicated thread, with a description of the archived thread
Endchan starts autosaging at 500 posts, but the bump limit is 1000. I think max amount of files in a post is 5. So theoretically you could keep 500-5000 threads archived in a thread.
Media heavy threads, like bunch of webm/mp4s are different a bit...
Pls don't use imageboards as data storage facilities...

>>18418
we're not a forum.

we would run an archive but I feel like that's best done by a third-party to help keep us honest.

We're going to add auto-archiving to wrongthink.net