>>13096
If they find out and retaliate it could destroy this little board with a wipe. We aren't equipped with armies of active moderators like 4chan.

>>13103
They won't you double faggot.

>>13103
Should I play yume nikki? Do you need rpgmaker to run it?

>>13135
I don't think you do. The game was pretty awesome to explore as we tried to interpret the meaning of her dreams a few years ago, but now it might feel a little dated or boring. You can try it and see if you like it; there's a whole chan devoted just to that game, and the fandom has made some nice hikki art.

If I had to pick somebody to fuck with I would say Viceland. All their content is really weak leftist drivel. I was excited when my cable provider picked them up but they have no good programming what so ever. They claim to be journalists but watch any of their content you don't come away with anything. The thing that really pushed me over the edge with them was they're picking Bam Margera up for some bull shit.
I keep an eye on their content and everything they do is horrible. Plus since they're SJW, we wuz cucks based out of new york with Murdoch money behind them it's going to be easy to get them riled up.

>>12859
That's just your interpretation, what if you're wrong? He could send you to hell for mispronouncing his name.

He inspired me to write a christian ballad belive it or not.
You want to know but you don't wanna believe what you read
you Just want to Perceive and let the children bleed.
You want it all but your too quick to be sure
so you ask more and more as you crawl down to the floor
They took an oath to the devil below
and all you people pretend not to now.
Still they wonder about what to look for,
when they see it they will just ignore.

>>12901
I don't choose not to know of a thing and neither does anyone ese. I get knowledge and my beliefs follow without my permission. I cannot choose to not know there is a sky. Your poetry is composed of shit.

>>12738
Yeshua means jesus btw

>>13137
Hi Karl!
Your head is a fucking orange.

Whoops meant to reply to >>13045, oh well

superglue it to your forehead

why

post more you fucking retard lmao

send it to your mom in an envelope

So, tell us what it taste like?

>>13008
>Become rich
I don't see a reason to. I've grown up without having to work myself through school, and I have inherited enough money and stand to inherit enough that there's not really a rush for me to work to become rich. I could do minimum wage work my whole life and I'll probably still inherit a house to live in.

The point is, what am I going to do with the money if I become rich? I'd rather read books or go online than go to concerts, I like simple stuff that doesn't require it, and I play a guitar. In the end I'd just end up giving it away if I didn't do something stupid.

I'm not a materialist, I've experienced most of what money could bring me while growing up, and now I'm content to be lazy. Every day I see poorfags graduating from college work to become yuppies that work their ass off and save up to experience for the first time the marketed shit that I've already had, and most of it is lonely shit that isn't intellectual or particularly memorable.

Wow, look at you being all defensive about information going against your preconceived biases.:^)

But on all seriousness, here's the articles they reference.
Backfire effect: http://archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_backfire_effect.php
more: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
Flu shots: https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/12/vaccine-myth-busting-can-backfire/383700/
Social rejection activates same parts of brain as physical pain: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797610374741?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3Dpubmed&

Here's another study that questions whether the backfire effect actually happened.
Backfire effect is rare and depends on phrasing of question: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2819073
more: http://www.poynter.org/2016/fact-checking-doesnt-backfire-new-study-suggests/436983/ also has links on the backfire effect
fact checking increase accuracy of beliefs: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~nyhan/fact-checking-effects.pdf
not thtat this is from the same people who conducted the backfire effect.

Of course, I haven't read any of them which means I can't act like I know what I'm talking about. But if someone else wants to take their time to actually learn what the fuck researchers think about this then I guess this is a starting point. A list of studies related to confirmation bias, fact checking, fake news and all that shit.
https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/fact-checking-research-studies/fact-checking-research-what-works-what-doesnt-whats-promising-in-accountability-journalism/

i'm pretty sure that boxing coach is Robert Englund, a master thespian as seen as the 2008 modern classic, Zombie Strippers

>>12866
>>12944
>Acetaminophen Reduces Social pain Behavioral and Neural Evidence

"One limitation to the work presented here is that we did not
include an experimental condition in which participants expe-
rienced physical pain. Future research should examine whether
acetaminophen affects the same neural regions in response to
both physical and social pain. Other research avenues include
investigating potential dose-dependent responses to acetamin-
ophen in reducing social pain, and the time course of such
relationships. Acetaminophen has a relatively short half-life,
lasting approximately 4 hr (Pappas, Taylor, & Ackerman,
1991), which means that it is unlikely that acetaminophen had
a cumulative effect in our experiments. Our finding that acet-
aminophen reduced hurt feelings over time could be due to a
combination of not feeling hurt and having a greater ability to

The issue here is that "factual" doesn't mean anything in layman's data acquisition, it's just surrendering one source of authority over to another, which is itself a cognitive burden, and the general issue of facing the paradox of positivism. When every source of information is a blind gamble, why favor the one supported by people who take a tribalistic stance against you? People with an agenda to "prove you wrong" or in fact who have any care of your previous opinion being either right or wrong. That itself pre-selects the evidence used on the basis of being more effective at proving you wrong rather than being accurate, which makes it inductively weaker evidence than any that would just befall you without any context. Even by chance it's smarter to avoid listening to people who try to convince you, and even if they're trying to 4d chess you into believing the opposite of what they say, it's more likely that they'll just fail even at that. In the meantime, free information that is allowed to disseminate stripped of context is more likely to just happen to teach you more accurately than anybody who is having some kind of an agenda, because statistically they'll cancel each other out but statistically random factions with agendas aren't going to corner you equally.

If you really want to convince anybody, the best way is when they don't know you're trying to, but when neither do you know that you're trying to. But at that point you're really shit at convincing, because you're an unlikable little shit and probably talking shit just to impress a girl or some shit.

less newfags and less datamining

>>12206
You think that goatse guy just got caught literally with his pants down and it was some sort of defense mechanism?

>>12209
probably to scare away newfags yes

i only came to take your webm. with my mission complete i will post it on 8ch hahahahahaha get reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeekt endniggers

I ate breakfast and accidentally enlightened.