Elon Musk, the iconic entrepreneur behind SpaceX and Tesla, is widely hailed as a genius, a disruptor, and sometimes, a misfit. However, since his takeover of Twitter in 2022, several of his promises to uphold Twitter (now X) as a “free speech” platform have fallen through. Popular YouTube personality Jeremy Hambly, AKA “The Quartering,” highlighted that most of the missteps began with the appointment of Twitter’s new CEO, Linda Yaccarino. She entered the scene with a questionable track record, marked by apparent censorial tendencies and alleged affiliations with the World Economic Forum (WEF). Such a background was, for many, a red flag. Elon’s choice was, at the outset, a bid to salvage Twitter’s dwindling profitability through an aggressive advertising focus. And true, in the short term, advertising is the lifeline Twitter needs, especially as it continues to bleed cash.

However, Musk had promised a renewed emphasis on ‘freedom of speech, not freedom of reach’ for Twitter. The intention behind this was to differentiate between the right to voice an opinion and the reach that opinion gets on the platform. But the implementation seems to have missed the mark. The reality is that while Twitter, under Musk, was vocal about being a ‘free speech’ platform, there was an alarming increase in account bans and content deboosting. Such actions made one question the transparency and authenticity of Musk’s commitment. It’s evident that any content deemed ‘spicy’ or potentially contentious faced an 81% deboost, a statistic unsettling to many, especially when such determinations rely heavily on automated systems known for inaccuracies. Musk’s assurances were further undermined by policies rolled out, which eerily resembled the old ‘Twitter 1.0’ rules - stringent content guidelines against incitement, threats, or what they ambiguously termed ‘abusive content.’ It felt like a rerun, only under a different leadership banner.

Yet, it wasn’t just about speech. Musk’s takeover promised no permanent bans unless there was a breach of the law. This pledge, however, remained unfulfilled as numerous accounts faced unwarranted permanent bans, highlighting a glaring discrepancy between promises and actions. For example, popular Twitter personality @dom_lucre was banned shortly after questioning the drowning of former President Barack Obama’s personal chef. It wasn’t until a massive public outcry over the suspension that @dom_lucre’s account was reinstated. The same goes for former pharma executive Sasha Latypova. Her account was banned for reported “hate speech,” a far cry from being unlawful speech and a vague term that can be weaponized to silence speech one doesn’t like. Latypova’s account was also reinstated, but it wasn’t until criticism of the suspension that “X” decided to reverse its decision.

Substack is a blogging platform primarily intended for independent writers, who depend on user subscriptions to support themselves. Ever since a controversy after the launching of “notes,” an added Substack feature similar to “X,” Substack articles no longer receive an image preview on “X,” making someone far less likely to click the shared link. In addition, the deboosting of the external link is far more severe than that of other news outlets — even if someone manually includes an image. In my own experience [the author of this article], sharing a post with a Substack link could receive as high as an 80% to 90% reduction in engagement compared to a post with no external link with an image or video. usk has repeatedly said, “Unless people that you don’t like can say things that you don’t like, it’s not free speech.”

[OP note: Are you surprised the Hebejew name (((Elon))) from the jewish University of Pretoria whom partnered Tesla with Israeli Cortica and is a member of the WEF isn't trustworthy? Because I'm not surprised.]

https://vigilantnews.com/post/x-is-not-living-up-to-what-elon-musk-promised-heres-why
https://archive.is/wip/Pp5P7

It is beyond dispute that there exists a veritable plethora of Jewish celebrities beyond the confines of this solitary image. However, this discourse pertains to my personal Jew-Radar, an instinctive inborn mechanism I have that adeptly filters out the alien parasites, particularly when confronted with their insipid personas. Consequently, I have refrained from indulging in the more insidious, brainwashing narratives surrounding Jewish newcomers. I shall commence revealing Adam Brody, the individual primarily recognized for his role in the Shazam film series. Under the guidance of (((David F. Sandberg and Zachary Levi))), Brody’s portrayal of Shazam is purported to represent the "adult" incarnation of Billy Batson. Yet, rather than embodying maturity, we are presented with a cringe-inducing caricature of an overgrown adolescent, forever ensnared in the stasis of his first middle school slumber party. His comedic endeavors descend like a leaden balloon, awkwardly forced and painfully unamusing. It evokes the image of a father attempting to be "cool" among the youth. As the de facto elder of the Shazam family, he remains a chaotic, indecisive presence, fostering discord rather then any semblance of heroism. His strategic acumen amounts to little more than reckless improvisation. His smug delivery of half-baked quips invites the question of whether he is, in fact, endeavoring to provoke a punch to the face.

Even amidst apocalyptic stakes, Brody flippantly cracks jokes akin to a nervous stand-up comic faltering at an open mic. There exists a time for levity, and then there's being an emotional void; Brody excels in the latter. Shazam comes across as a frat boy unwittingly wandering into a cosplay contest. After two films, the charade becomes wearisome. One would anticipate some semblance of growth; alas, his dialogue resembles a rejected first draft of a Deadpool script, deemed too desperate in its attempts at humor. Not every utterance necessitates a punchline, a fact seemingly overlooked by Brody's scriptwriters. Even in moments of unleashing lightning or confronting monsters, he lacks any semblance of intimidation; possessing neither the physical presence nor the commanding energy befitting one of DC’s most formidable heroes. Adam Brody’s rendition of Shazam epitomizes the tragic outcome of a potentially vibrant character, stripped of all depth, gravitas, and affability, leaving only a snarky, juvenile facade that quickly overstays its welcome. If this represents the future of heroism, perhaps Jews are telling us they like their heroes incredibly dim-witted. They certainly prefer their Presidents this way.

Now, let us examine the Jewish elements beyond Brody’s portrayal as a TikTok-obsessed, Fortnite-dancing Zoomer caricature masquerading as a hero—an entity that embodies a walking safe space endowed with superhuman strength. Prepare your checklists, for the films soak heavily in the realm of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. They have taken what should have been a legendary warrior and relegated him to the status of the typical "awkward Caucasian portrayed by a Jew" amid a cohort of characters who exude coolness while he flounders like a beta male wielding lightning bolts. The hallmark of most Jew narratives is not representation, but rather, character assassination. When certain quips revolve around the absurd notions of "toxic masculinity" or "emotions are challenging to express naturally" it becomes evident that the writers harbor a disdain for tradition and humanity—indeed, this is only Jews reflecting their own depraved minds. "Oh, the burden of responsibility is so daunting!" does not constitute humor; it serves as a form of psychological conditioning aimed at fostering weakness and inability to face reality. Villains? True evil is seldom illuminated, for doing so would only expose the Jews. Shazam is not a champion; rather, he is a corporate marionette for (((Warner Bros))). They transformed a Titan into a self-deprecating, emotionally fragile joke, displaying a blatant contempt for traditionalism and heroism.