>>78440
picrel would be me if op posted any more context

Endchan will tell you this captcha response is wrong

>>78093
did you have js disabled? they expire

>>78092
Or if someone posted a way to get CP. It happened 3 weeks ago.

this is so fucking gay

>your post is a bit too long, post a few shorter posts and then blah blah blah

nigger I'm posting from tor. I get a new ip every time I come on here

I kept hearing that le seed oils are le bad so I decided to test it out for myself and switched to only animal fat for a few months and felt horrible. then I switched back to seed oils and now I feel fine again

>>78530
Are you addicted to seed oils? I just never heard of anything like that, unless you happen to be buying really cheap questionable fats.

If you stick with oil I would recommend extra virgin olive oil or coconut oil. Those two oils are not toxic.

>>78534
I think what's going on here is that the
>seed oils are bad
meme is idiotic internet nonsense with no basis in reality. People parrot it online because it's the hip thing to do for some strange reason. In reality, vegetable oils are perfectly healthy and an excellent source of nutrition.

>>78540
Most seed oils are highly processed, mass produced in factories, only developed over the last 60 years, not natural whatsoever.

The fact is humans have been cooking with animal fats for centuries without any highly processed oils. 60 years ago, before the mass consumption of vegetable oil or canola oil, cancer was not common. In the 1960s if someone got cancer it would make a headline on a local newspaper. If you were to match up statistics in correlation between cancer rates and seed oil consumption it paints a very suspicious and disturbing and familiar pattern era after era.

I'm not trying to scare anyone, if you enjoy seed oil just understand there could be unknown health risks in association. Some people are convinced food giant lobbyists have bribed the FDA to cover it up. And after all, it was once the FDA that said lead was safe for human consumption many decades ago. We now know 100% that was not true.

>>78544
Anything highly processed is unhealthy. I all comes to whether you're buying the premium stuff or the stuff that's meant to be sold to niggers.

I would let her sit on my face too.

oo she hot

>>75067
qt any more pics of her?

>>78526
google her, it does not allow me to post file anymore

>>78223
Neither you are a retarded faggot for that image of Pepe the frog. I attached the unfucked image of it. FUCK DMCA AND COPYRIGHT SHIT!

Here it is in .webp form too. OP you should get in bed with mickey mouse if you like copyrighting public memes.

>>78223
according to my psychic intuition you are a nigger

>>78483
Individually that is too complicated an issue because of the sheer amount of human life today, individuals who live completely different lifestyles and cultures, plus the fact the world is so globalized you have millions of people living outside their native countries.

To simplify this on a potential national IQ scale, look how the average citizens of each country live and what kinds of governments rule over those nations. This can tell you in general what to expect at the current era we live in.

Populations with lower IQ will have lots of poverty, violent crime, corruption at nearly all levels, often get involved with lots of unnecessary foreign entanglements/wars, very low standards of living for average workers, often laws that restrict political dissent, possibly even tribal and heavily balkanized, certainly divided by mundane primitive political ideology rather than common sense/what works/statistics/math.

Populations with higher IQ manufacture goods and create productive industry, have higher standards of living for average workers, strict but common sense law enforcement, strong border enforcement, governments will do what is best for their nation rather than neglect or cover-up serious problems, governments will not allow foreign interests to control domestic policy, national debt is not allowed to get out of control as there is rational limitation to maintain fiscal solvency. Populations are over all more patriotic because their country represents the interest of the citizenry instead of corrupt greedy monopolistic interests.

Send low IQ children to high IQ foster homes. This will increase the iq but not much. Keep sending low IQ children to high IQ foster homes for so many generations, the cumulative IQ increased can reach to a tipping point which changes everything.

If you watch corporate news, vote for politicians thinking they'll do anything for you and actually believe government propaganda you have room temperature IQ at best.

>>76662
Just pull the trigger already

>>76719
Im trying not to

>>76752
It's the only way out, brah. You're never getting that money from a bunch of 14yo, 3rd generation edgelords on a comatose image board

>pls halp I needs monies
>no story
What a shame, to see this is what the world has come to.

>>76662
I need about tree fitty